Видео

D-logm is kind of like raw.

I ended up giving it a 2/10 because it's fun in a so-bad-it's-good sort of way.

Ohhh okay I see, thank you for the warning! I’m surprised you responded since it’s been so long since posting the video, so thanks for that as well! If you have the time and energy as well, I would love to know your thoughts on the best Amazon drones between $150 - $250 if you have any suggestions. Trying to get a bday gift for my dad. Otherwise, have a good day!

@smolchild1343 No problem, I'm happy to help! In that price range my pick would definitely be the DJI Neo. It's $200, fits in a large pocket, has OK image quality, and is super easy to fly with zero experience and is one of the most durable little drones out there. I have a bunch of videos about it on my channel.

Good question! Same size sensor, but much more modern tech. I haven't done a side-by-side test, but that should mean better image quality from the Air 3S vs the Mavic 2 Pro. Alternatively, you could go for the Mavic 3 Classic which has an M4/3 sensor.

The super telephoto lens certainly amplified the drama of the scene too.

Grazie!

As I recall, I did use a selfie stick for those shots. It wasn't a complicated setup.

It's been awhile since I actually used Clarity Zoom, but as I recall it does maintain stabilization. I'm afraid I have no idea why there are no intermediate zoom settings.

This is a legacy forest, which is a forest that naturally regenerated after it was first logged (typically in the late 1800s or early-mid 1900s). They are in fact almost as rare now as old growth in Western Washington, and display many of the characteristics of old growth forest.

I never claimed that this was an old growth forest. It is a legacy forest, which is a forest that naturally regenerated after it was first logged (typically in the late 1800s or early-mid 1900s).

@@Illuminationsfromtheattic It is simply a second growth stand. There is nothing unique here.

@@BeautifuLakesStreamsBiologists A forest that naturally regenerated after the original old growth forest was logged is known as a legacy forest, and very little such legacy forest remains. Many have been identified to contain rare plant communities, and they are bastions of biodiversity. That biodiversity is lost when they are converted into timber plantations.

@@Illuminationsfromtheattic This type of forest is very common.

@@BeautifuLakesStreamsBiologists No, it is not. Very little such forest remains in the Pacific Northwest. The vast majority of forests outside of federally managed land have been converted into even-age low-diversity short-rotation timber plantations.

I never claimed that this was an old growth forest. It is a legacy forest, which is a forest that naturally regenerated after it was first logged (typically in the late 1800s or early-mid 1900s).

Legacy forests are resilient to fire. Timber plantations are extremely vulnerable to fire. Legacy forests moderate factors which contribute to catastrophic fire. Timber plantations and logging exacerbate the conditions which contribute to catastrophic fire.

The legacy forests I've shown in the video is about to be cut, and be replanted as a even-age low-diversity short-rotation plantation. This is an inarguable fact.

Exactly. WADNR is deeply corrupt.

Older, natural, biodiverse forests are more resilient to fire than managed forests, and logging only increases fire danger in such forests. Also, what WADNR is doing doesn't even resemble responsible forestry - they're clearcutting legacy forests and replacing them with low-diversity even-age short-rotation plantations that are extremely vulnerable to fire and disease.

Forest health is not measured by the number of trees per acre. Forests are extraordinarily complex ecosystems of which the trees themselves are but one small part. Furthermore, fire is natural part of forests, and healthy, older forests are both resilient to fire and help to reduce fire danger.

@@Illuminationsfromtheattic we have to agree to disagree.

A timber plantation is not a forest, and the differences between a legacy forest and a plantation art starkly obvious and easy to spot.

Washington's forest practices are outdated and harmful even to the timber industry. Even-age low-diversity short-rotation plantation forests produce lower quality lumber in reduced quantity than if they were instead to use selective-harvest, high-diversity, long-rotation forestry techniques.

A forest is not a garden, it is a highly evolved complex ecosystem which thrives best in the absence of human interference. "thinning and weeding" of an old, biodiverse forest actually exacerbates fire danger, and timber plantations are both extremely vulnerable to fire and exacerbate the conditions which contribute most significantly to fire danger.

WADNR isn't thinning legacy forests, they are clearcutting them and replacing them with even-age, low-diversity, short-rotation plantations which are extremely vulnerable to fire. Also, these legacy forests would not benefit from thinning, as they are typically extremely healthy and are not at all overcrowded.

Yep

​@@Illuminationsfromtheattici wish i owned land that has a forest in it. Honestly id turn it into a really big tiny homes village that hosts protection for forests. Keeping the trees n only elimanting weeds

@Illuminationsfromtheattic yes, natural forests are super healthy. No bark Beatles or sudden oak death around here... fire is what cleanses a forest and keeps diseases and pests from spreading. Either prescribe burns or let nature do what it knows how to do.