Ryan James Olivo
Ryan James Olivo
  • Видео 72
  • Просмотров 80 731

Видео

Intro to Numerical Solution Part 4 to CE Problems - Floating Point Representation
Просмотров 266Месяц назад
A simple excel spreadsheet and brief lecture for a 32 bit (Single Precision Floating Point Representation). How computers read numbers?
Intro to Numerical Solution Part 3 to Civil Engineering Problems - Decimal to Binary
Просмотров 157Месяц назад
Converting Decimal to Binary (Excel Spreadsheet)
Intro to Numerical Solution Part 2 to Civil Engineering Problems - Bits and Bytes
Просмотров 159Месяц назад
A brief video about what is bits and bytes for Numerical Solution to CE Problems
NSCP 2015 (UBC 97) Response Spectrum Analysis using ETABS
Просмотров 77310 месяцев назад
What is P-Delta Analysis? (NSCP 2015 Sec 503 - Steel Design) Part 1a - ruclips.net/video/9yRYGJ5hu-c/видео.html What is P-Delta Analysis? (NSCP 2015 Sec 503 - Steel Design) Part 1b - ruclips.net/video/gaGAYaATptQ/видео.html
NSCP 2015 (UBC 97) Static Force Procedure using ETABS
Просмотров 34410 месяцев назад
NSCP 2015 (UBC 97) Static Force Procedure using ETABS
How and Where to Get Data of Time Series for Earthquake Ground Motion
Просмотров 32211 месяцев назад
How and Where to Get Data of Time Series for Earthquake Ground Motion
Finding Eigenvalue of 5x5 using Spreadsheet (QR Factorization and Iteration)
Просмотров 357Год назад
Finding Eigenvalue of 5x5 using Spreadsheet (QR Factorization and Iteration)
Eigenvalue Determination Using QR Factorization and Iteration Algorithm (3x3) - Example Spreadsheet
Просмотров 369Год назад
Eigenvalue Determination Using QR Factorization and Iteration Algorithm (3x3) - Example Spreadsheet
AISC Manual Part 2a - Design of Beams (Discussion about Cb with Examples)
Просмотров 238Год назад
AISC Manual Part 2a - Design of Beams (Discussion about Cb with Examples)
AISC Manual Part 2b - Design of Flexure Members (Beam)
Просмотров 156Год назад
Lateral Torsional Buckling Modification Factor (Cb) - ruclips.net/video/OpKdWq3jo10/видео.html
AISC Manual Part 3 - Design of Compression Members
Просмотров 152Год назад
AISC Manual Part 3 - Design of Compression Members
AISC Manual Part 4 - Design of Tension Members
Просмотров 132Год назад
AISC Manual Part 4 - Design of Tension Members
AISC Manual Part 1 - Combined Loadings (Design of Gable Frame Subject to Wind Loading)
Просмотров 511Год назад
This is a design of the Girder (and Column) of the Gable Frame from the Wind Loading Playlist with the Application of the Required Strength Provision of NSCP 2015 Sec 503 or AISC 360-16 Chapter C Wind Load (NSCP 2015) - ruclips.net/p/PLvqk3TBNytBCkzYnnZAnurb2x7SiZEoIZ Required Strength (Steel Design) Playlist - ruclips.net/p/PLvqk3TBNytBCkK7Atj6LZ6bYjdwVXL0OL Lateral Torsional Buckling Modifica...
Required Strength from Wind Loading in ETABS (LRFD and ASD) - Part 3
Просмотров 352Год назад
The final lecture video for determination of required loads using ETABS from wind loading applied to a 30x36x16.5 m Gable Frame. Second-order effects, stiffness reduction and provision about ASD design philosophy (NSCP 2015 sec 503 - Structural Steel)
Effect of Stiffness Reduction (Provisions of NSCP Sec 503 - Steel Design) - Part 2
Просмотров 232Год назад
Effect of Stiffness Reduction (Provisions of NSCP Sec 503 - Steel Design) - Part 2
What is P-Delta Analysis? (NSCP 2015 Sec 503 - Steel Design) Part 1b
Просмотров 362Год назад
What is P-Delta Analysis? (NSCP 2015 Sec 503 - Steel Design) Part 1b
What is P-Delta Analysis? (NSCP 2015 Sec 503 - Steel Design) Part 1a
Просмотров 729Год назад
What is P-Delta Analysis? (NSCP 2015 Sec 503 - Steel Design) Part 1a
ETABS Wind Load (NSCP 2015) Part 3b - ASD Load Combinations
Просмотров 761Год назад
ETABS Wind Load (NSCP 2015) Part 3b - ASD Load Combinations
ETABS Wind Load (NSCP 2015) Part 3a - LRFD Load Combinations
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.Год назад
ETABS Wind Load (NSCP 2015) Part 3a - LRFD Load Combinations
ETABS Wind Load (NSCP 2015) Part 1 - Modelling of Gable Hangar
Просмотров 2,3 тыс.Год назад
ETABS Wind Load (NSCP 2015) Part 1 - Modelling of Gable Hangar
ETABS Wind Load (NSCP 2015) Part 2 - Load Patterns and Load Cases
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.Год назад
ETABS Wind Load (NSCP 2015) Part 2 - Load Patterns and Load Cases
Wind Load (NSCP 2015) - Internal Pressure Enclosure Classification with Examples
Просмотров 2,8 тыс.Год назад
Wind Load (NSCP 2015) - Internal Pressure Enclosure Classification with Examples
Wind Load (NSCP 2015): External Pressure Coefficient (Cp) With Example
Просмотров 10 тыс.Год назад
Wind Load (NSCP 2015): External Pressure Coefficient (Cp) With Example
Wind Load (NSCP 2015): Gust Effect Factor with Examples on Flexible Structure
Просмотров 3,9 тыс.Год назад
Wind Load (NSCP 2015): Gust Effect Factor with Examples on Flexible Structure
Wind Load (NSCP 2015): Topographic Effects (With Example)
Просмотров 3,1 тыс.Год назад
Wind Load (NSCP 2015): Topographic Effects (With Example)
Wind Load (NSCP 2015): Exposure Category
Просмотров 3,6 тыс.Год назад
Wind Load (NSCP 2015): Exposure Category
Introduction to Wind Load Part 2 (NSCP 2015): MWFRS and C&C
Просмотров 3,9 тыс.Год назад
Introduction to Wind Load Part 2 (NSCP 2015): MWFRS and C&C
Introduction to Wind Loads Part 1 (NSCP 2015)
Просмотров 9 тыс.Год назад
Introduction to Wind Loads Part 1 (NSCP 2015)
Response Of Linear SDOF System To El Centro Earthquake - Modified Newmark Beta
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.2 года назад
Response Of Linear SDOF System To El Centro Earthquake - Modified Newmark Beta

Комментарии

  • @Hans-1104
    @Hans-1104 17 дней назад

    thank you sir

  • @lenzylalimbuyao5076
    @lenzylalimbuyao5076 Месяц назад

    Ngayon malinaw na, na ang mga computer ay hindi direct na nakakaintindi ng mga numbers tulad ng 1, 2, 3. Need muna nitong gawing 0 at 1 ang mga ito gamit ang binary system. After maging binary, ginagamit ng computer ang mga logic gate para ih process ang info at makuha ang tamang results. Wow!

  • @lenzylalimbuyao5076
    @lenzylalimbuyao5076 Месяц назад

    It’s amazing how excel can be use to explain how computers read and process numbers ❤, good job sir James🎉

  • @euliesnotes.
    @euliesnotes. Месяц назад

    i've learned so much from this discussion thank you!

  • @eng.ahmadzaide6196
    @eng.ahmadzaide6196 3 месяца назад

    the condition number 3 say that the building is near the crest or in the up half hill, which is not in this example !

  • @victorromo6530
    @victorromo6530 3 месяца назад

    Would it be possible to purchase the spreadsheet from you?

  • @ryanpry2215
    @ryanpry2215 5 месяцев назад

    Thank you for the materi sir. I want to ask what is the value of "e" in the K3 formula ?

    • @ryanjamesolivo6516
      @ryanjamesolivo6516 5 месяцев назад

      e is constant and is called "Euler's number" the base of natural log function. It is equal to e = 2.71828

  • @rofeljohnwong7000
    @rofeljohnwong7000 5 месяцев назад

    hello sir, pwde po ma shareniyo po copy of your NSCP 2015

  • @martchevligue1118
    @martchevligue1118 5 месяцев назад

    pahelp po everytime nag si-sign up ako lagi lumalabas yung "We're sorry, but something went wrong. We've been notified about this issue and we'll take a look at it shortly."

  • @muhamadfahzandifinubun900
    @muhamadfahzandifinubun900 6 месяцев назад

    Thank You Mr. Olivo

  • @venkatarajukalidindi5985
    @venkatarajukalidindi5985 7 месяцев назад

    Very good and i would like to have Excel spreadsheet for gust affect factor for flexible structure Would you pl send me

  • @陳1013
    @陳1013 7 месяцев назад

    The chicken!

  • @ch_doodles
    @ch_doodles 8 месяцев назад

    Hi po. If mas malaki po yung shear from rsa, need pa po ba iscale down to equal it sa static shear or no need to scale na po and as is yung shear from rsa na gagamitin na? Ty po

    • @ryanjamesolivo6516
      @ryanjamesolivo6516 8 месяцев назад

      Ung sa RSA na base shear na po gamitin niyo.

    • @ch_doodles
      @ch_doodles 8 месяцев назад

      @@ryanjamesolivo6516 okay po. normal lang din po ba umabot ng more than 2-3times ang laki ng rsa compared sa static?

  • @vincentdanielflores913
    @vincentdanielflores913 9 месяцев назад

    what is the classification of streetlights or lamp posts in calculating wind loads?

  • @deniztuna-n2t
    @deniztuna-n2t 9 месяцев назад

    can u please send me excel?

  • @basirazizi793
    @basirazizi793 10 месяцев назад

    Dear Sir, Thank you very much for the valuable video. Would it be possible for us to have the Newmark excel sheet Thanks

  • @omerfarukkalayc9027
    @omerfarukkalayc9027 10 месяцев назад

    what are the formulas for k* , a1, a2 and a3 ?

  • @mr.d3916
    @mr.d3916 Год назад

    Sir lecture video po ba ito ng masters or undergrad?

  • @vincentmichaelg.sauler4514
    @vincentmichaelg.sauler4514 Год назад

    Good day, sir. If possible sir, pwede po maka hingi ng excel file niyo for topographic effects sa wind load? Salamat po sir!

  • @albenibarra8567
    @albenibarra8567 Год назад

    for K1, is it K1*H/Lh or K1/(H/Lh)? as per your video you multiplied 0.85 to H/Lh instead of division.

    • @ryanjamesolivo6516
      @ryanjamesolivo6516 Год назад

      yes po, you multiply, kasi K1/(H/Lh) = 0.85. So K1 = 0.85*(H/Lh)

  • @xinyiwang5717
    @xinyiwang5717 Год назад

    hi, can you leave me a contact. I need help for calculating wind load for mounted solar project.

  • @jaykenarn6223
    @jaykenarn6223 Год назад

    Sir, if the problem states that we assume a 2d-hill, do I use the 3d-axisymmetrical hill or the 2d ridges?

  • @denverdano6487
    @denverdano6487 Год назад

    Sir question po. Pano po kapag angle < 10 deg.. then ang wind is normal to ridge.. both for wind ward and lee ward side ba eh same ang Cp? Sample.. h/L = 0.5, Cp will be both 0.9 . Then other case is both 0.18?

    • @ryanjamesolivo6516
      @ryanjamesolivo6516 Год назад

      Gamitin niyo po ung table po ng parallel to the ridge, ung may "Horizontal distance from windward edge"

  • @thelottoman4189
    @thelottoman4189 Год назад

    Ano po ang time history analysis?

    • @ryanjamesolivo6516
      @ryanjamesolivo6516 Год назад

      paghanap po ng response ng isang structure sa actual or synthetic earthquake (ground acceleration vs time graph). Numerical analysis po it ng differential equation. You can watch my video about an example sa Time History of a single degree of freedom system ruclips.net/video/VEyEpXFN6sA/видео.html

  • @niyatidadhwal9148
    @niyatidadhwal9148 Год назад

    Hi Ryan, can you share the excel sheet

  • @engr.nawafa.endaila3747
    @engr.nawafa.endaila3747 Год назад

    Good day Sir. Engr.! May I know what book are you using in this video? Seems clearer than the NSCP 2015 pdf that I got from the internet. Hehe

  • @engrgep
    @engrgep Год назад

    Membrane will not contribute to frame stiffness. But what will be the difference when we will not change the modifier to 0? Thank you

    • @ryanjamesolivo6516
      @ryanjamesolivo6516 Год назад

      Yes, membrane does not have an in-plane stiffness, but it has an out-of-plane stiffness. Therefore, if you want to remove the out-of-plane stiffness modify the stiffness properties of the membrane to 0.

    • @engrgep
      @engrgep Год назад

      @@ryanjamesolivo6516 thanks. Sir i try another way. Instead of stiffness modifier i used material property with 0 weight. The shear and moment almost the same. But for the axial big difference. Any comment?

  • @hussienalkasim1672
    @hussienalkasim1672 Год назад

    That is a great explanation. I like it, sir. But I have one question. can we choose any mass and stiffness value to get maximum responses, or are there any recommended natural periods that we can use to collect maximum responses of the system for each damping ratio? with regards!

    • @ryanjamesolivo6516
      @ryanjamesolivo6516 Год назад

      Yes, we can graph all the different periods of vibration vs the maximum responses (e.g. acceleration, velocity and displacements) this is what we call the response spectrum curves (RSC) We use RSC for response spectrum analysis (RSA). Most earthquake codes uses a damping ratio of about 5% Responses are a function of the period/frequency and the damping ratio in RSC.

  • @microcruzer5993
    @microcruzer5993 Год назад

    sir what if yung h/L is 0.46 consider 0.5 na po ba?

    • @ryanjamesolivo6516
      @ryanjamesolivo6516 Год назад

      Kung normal to the ridge, interpolate niyo Po, kung parallel to the ridge consider niyo 0.5,

    • @microcruzer5993
      @microcruzer5993 Год назад

      @@ryanjamesolivo6516 eto po siya sir di ko po kasi alam paano na derive sa -0.81 and -0.17 sa windward yung sa reference ko Roof Pressure Coeff: h/L=9.75/21=0.46 Winward -0.81 -0.17 Leeward -0.49 Roof Angle=13.39 deg. interpolate muna po ba yung value ng h/L before yung sa angle? 0.25 -0.7 0.46 x 0.5 -0.9

  • @Hezekiah7777zjckfka
    @Hezekiah7777zjckfka 2 года назад

    Helpful yung mga videos mo sir. Especially yung Response spectrum analysis na discussion mo using the software. Nagkakaidea na kami as students about seismic design. Thank you sa effort ng pagdiscuss I hope na marami pa kayong maturuan.

    • @jomaredillon9564
      @jomaredillon9564 Год назад

      Can I have your excel file sir? About the elcentro earthquake using newmarks method?

  • @chy5529
    @chy5529 2 года назад

    Sir thank you sa vids! Very helpful. More uploads to come particularly earthquake engineering haha nscp 2015 godbless po