fizzym
fizzym
  • Видео 46
  • Просмотров 14 829
ENPH 353 2023 T2 Lec Wk 06 Part 2 Even More NN
Underfitting, overfitting, training vs validation vs test sets, regularization, normalization, data augmentation, transfer learning, limits of training.
Просмотров: 15

Видео

ENPH 353 2023 T2 Lec Wk 03 Part 1 - ROS
Просмотров 3710 месяцев назад
ENPH 353 2023 T2 Lec Wk 03 Part 1 - ROS
ENPH 353 2023 T2 Lec Wk 02 Part 2 - Python and CV
Просмотров 6110 месяцев назад
ENPH 353 2023 T2 Lec Wk 02 Part 2 - Python and CV
02 Limitations of Servo Systems, Introduction to Sensors, and LVDT
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
03 Differential Sensors, Normalization, and Capacitive Sensors
Просмотров 926Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016 MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
04 Capacitive Sensors, Null Sensors, and Optical Sensors
Просмотров 637Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
05 Optical Sensors
Просмотров 529Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
06 Optical Sensors, Light Modulation, Noise Filtering, and Optical Encoders
Просмотров 401Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
07 Optical Encoders, Cameras, and Interferometers
Просмотров 548Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
08 Tellurometers and Inductosyn
Просмотров 795Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
09 Summary of Sensors, Limits of Accuracy, and Unusual Sensors
Просмотров 755Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
10 Interfacing, Filter Selection, and Types of Wires
Просмотров 389Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
11 Transmission Lines, Shielding, and Grounding
Просмотров 423Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
12 Choice of Filter, Grounding, and Sampling
Просмотров 325Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
13 Introduction to Actuators and Moving Coil Actuators
Просмотров 376Год назад
MECH 520 - Sensors and Actuators for Control Systems by Dan Gelbart UBC 2016
14 Moving Magnet Actuators, Moving Iron Actuators, and Capacitive Actuators
Просмотров 399Год назад
14 Moving Magnet Actuators, Moving Iron Actuators, and Capacitive Actuators
15 Moving Iron Actuators, Snap, and AC Operation of Moving Iron Actuators
Просмотров 253Год назад
15 Moving Iron Actuators, Snap, and AC Operation of Moving Iron Actuators
16 Piezoelectric Actuators, Magnetostrictive Actuators, and Stepping Piezo Actuators
Просмотров 437Год назад
16 Piezoelectric Actuators, Magnetostrictive Actuators, and Stepping Piezo Actuators
17 Series and Parallelwound DC Motors, and PM vs Non PM Motors
Просмотров 259Год назад
17 Series and Parallelwound DC Motors, and PM vs Non PM Motors
18 DC Motors, Brushless DC Motors, and Rotating Field Polyphase Systems
Просмотров 230Год назад
18 DC Motors, Brushless DC Motors, and Rotating Field Polyphase Systems
19 Synchronous Motors and Stepper Motors
Просмотров 344Год назад
19 Synchronous Motors and Stepper Motors
20 Power Angle, Microstepping, Motor Drives, and Induction Motors
Просмотров 207Год назад
20 Power Angle, Microstepping, Motor Drives, and Induction Motors
21 Induction Motor Characteristics, Motor Selection, Cogging, and Detent Torque
Просмотров 198Год назад
21 Induction Motor Characteristics, Motor Selection, Cogging, and Detent Torque
22 Induction Motor, Unusual Electromagnets, Braking of Motors, and Tradeoff in Motor Design
Просмотров 178Год назад
22 Induction Motor, Unusual Electromagnets, Braking of Motors, and Tradeoff in Motor Design
23 MHD, System Design, and Regenerative Braking
Просмотров 198Год назад
23 MHD, System Design, and Regenerative Braking
24 System Design
Просмотров 294Год назад
24 System Design
25 System Design
Просмотров 219Год назад
25 System Design
01 Introduction and History of Servo Systems
Просмотров 3,1 тыс.Год назад
01 Introduction and History of Servo Systems
Personal Finace for Fizz Part 2
Просмотров 582 года назад
Personal Finace for Fizz Part 2
Personal Finance For Fizz Part 1
Просмотров 1122 года назад
Personal Finance For Fizz Part 1

Комментарии

  • @Tadesan
    @Tadesan 2 месяца назад

    These lectures are a river of gold

  • @jbay088
    @jbay088 4 месяца назад

    An oriental motor sales rep came by once and told me that their latest series of steppers had a 30 micron airgap. I stopped him and made him double check because that was so hard to believe. It was clearly the first time that sales rep had ever really thought about what that implied. "Huh, I guess that is pretty impressive actually", he said.

  • @jbay088
    @jbay088 4 месяца назад

    Something that I wondered for a long time is why not just use the neutral to ground the metal case. After all it's at the same potential as ground, right? Why not save copper? There's a good reason of course: if the neutral wire ever gets severed anywhere between the service panel and the appliance, it would cause the appliance case to become live, even without any short anywhere. Like let's say the appliance is a stove, with a heating element between live and neutral. You turn it on, not realizing that the neutral wire is broken; because of that, there's no current through the load, so there's no potential drop across the heating element, so the disconnected neutral line gets energized to live voltage, and if the appliance case is "grounded" by the neutral you get a shock. That's why the appliance case needs its own ground connection independent of the neutral.

  • @jbay088
    @jbay088 4 месяца назад

    Dan, great lecture as always. By the way I think this looking-at-you detector does have to do with vision. Because the human eye is not just a sphere, it also has a lens which -- if he's looking at you and focused on you, it focuses your image on his retina perfectly. So that will make the eye a perfect retroreflector and correct for any imperfection in the eye's index of refraction, and the glasses he's wearing will only help! Also, you might find this interesting -- E.T. Jaynes points out that the best sensors are optimized to mostly reflect EM waves, rather than to absorb them like a solar panel would. So it's not even a coincidence that the retina is reflective (and so are CCDs). It turns out that you get a better signal-to-noise ratio that way. It's an off-hand remark in his paper "theory of radar target discrimination" (1991).

  • @gfr2023
    @gfr2023 4 месяца назад

    I like this man because he insert history of technology everywhere

  • @Tadesan
    @Tadesan 4 месяца назад

    This guy has me in tears. Engineering is so good.

  • @Tadesan
    @Tadesan 4 месяца назад

    Keyence's "handheld CMM" uses a camera to image a quartz cube with a fiducial grid embedded inside to measure the angle of the cube.

  • @Transmission4less
    @Transmission4less 5 месяцев назад

    nice.

  • @AllTheFasteners
    @AllTheFasteners 6 месяцев назад

    All this stuff you get taught at university is very easy to forget - until you actually need it in practice, and then it's the most important thing in the world 😂

  • @ILiketoBreakStuff
    @ILiketoBreakStuff 8 месяцев назад

    The energy method for calculating forces in moving iron actuators is one of multiple methods. It should be noted that this method does not account for the flux that escapes from the magnetic flow path. In the case of a well designed solenoid with a ferromagnetic case these losses are small. In many designs these losses are not negligible. If one wants to delve more into solenoid design I would suggest reading Electromagnetic Devices: by Roters. As he had noted the profile of the armature interface can also have a large effect on the profile of the force curve. This can also be significant. Thank you fizzym for making these lectures available! I appreciate all the content from Dan Gelbart. He never ceases to amaze me!

  • @dsfs17987
    @dsfs17987 8 месяцев назад

    ~20min mark talking about distortion is a bit unclear, the amplifier doesn't naturally cancel or fight any distortion, it is just the characteristics of a typical real world amplifier are such that, when used at low gain, they will not introduce a lot of distortion, that is a byproduct of the technology at the time (and to some extent even now), not a law related to amplifiers in general that is why it is quite common in electronics to see couple opamps in series to do work which one could do, and a lot of times extra opamp is "free" anyway, since there usually is a number of them in a package

    • @dgelbart
      @dgelbart 6 месяцев назад

      An open loop amplifier can only add distortion, not reduce it. An amplifier with negative feedback, like an op-amp, actively reduces distortion, theoretically to zero if the gain is high enough. This distortion reduction is true even if the amplifier itself causes distortion.

  • @adammontgomery7980
    @adammontgomery7980 8 месяцев назад

    I don't understand the term bandwidth in this context. Anybody?

    • @jbay088
      @jbay088 4 месяца назад

      Bandwidth in this case refers to the unity-gain crossover frequency of the open-loop servo system (or the -3 dB point of the closed-loop system, because 1/(1+1) = 0.5, and 10log10(0.5) = -3). The servo control loop has authority between 0 Hz up to this frequency, so that's the "bandwidth" of the servo.

  • @tylerjmast
    @tylerjmast 8 месяцев назад

    The quality is fine you must have been born recently if you think otherwise. And what do you want them to do exactly, go back in time?

  • @adammontgomery7980
    @adammontgomery7980 8 месяцев назад

    If one of the three phases was made to lead or lag, wouldn't you lose the virtual ground?

  • @ahbushnell1
    @ahbushnell1 8 месяцев назад

    To bad the resolution is so bad. I can't read the equations.

  • @ryebis
    @ryebis 9 месяцев назад

    It would be more helpful for students if you could upload a higher quality video. Hard to read the board.

  • @colsanjaybajpai5747
    @colsanjaybajpai5747 9 месяцев назад

    Very bad audio in some part . Who played volleyball with microphone

    • @jbay088
      @jbay088 4 месяца назад

      There's some sort of ancient curse that says that any time Dan Gelbart gives a priceless lecture about sensing small signals, the microphone gives out, and the poor student helplessly editing the video gains a lifelong appreciation for signal-to-noise ratios and distortion.

  • @colsanjaybajpai5747
    @colsanjaybajpai5747 9 месяцев назад

    Very informative and great experience

  • @tannerewing9361
    @tannerewing9361 10 месяцев назад

    I am not a student, I own a company that designs electronic products. One of my engineers stumbled on your lecture on Tellurometers while researching a project we are working on. Since then I have learned a ton from you. Thank you for sharing your work and simple explanations. You are a talented instructor.

  • @sebaschtl9710
    @sebaschtl9710 10 месяцев назад

    @fizzym: I'm so happy to listen, thank you so much for sharing all those videos!

  • @skivvy3565
    @skivvy3565 10 месяцев назад

    I love watching anything with dan gelbart

  • @damienmiller
    @damienmiller 10 месяцев назад

    Thanks a heap for uploading these, if you have any more then please upload them too :)

  • @Tadesan
    @Tadesan 10 месяцев назад

    There's an interesting phenomenon with audiophiles swapping normal opamps for high bandwidth ones and those new opamps oscillating at like 10mhz and dissipating a watt....

  • @Tadesan
    @Tadesan 10 месяцев назад

    On Governors is a must read!

  • @MrFujinko
    @MrFujinko 11 месяцев назад

    Never thought of a balance as a null device. Very nice lecture, thank you for posting.

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    An intuitive understanding of why an induction-motor can keep running when the starter-capacitor is disconnected: ruclips.net/video/Uuh_T648J_8/видео.html

  • @littleboot_
    @littleboot_ 11 месяцев назад

    Thank you so much for sharing, (Dan Gelbart is brilliant and a great teacher, why didn't I hear of this guy before). Looking forward to watching all videos in this series

    • @wtfatc4556
      @wtfatc4556 9 месяцев назад

      Take a look at his channel. He is a really great guy

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    Point of nuance: Not all rotating-field motors are constant-angular-speed - the chief exception is the induction-motor where the slip (reduction in angular speed) is dependent on load (torque). I suppose this shall be covered in the next lecture. 1:14:16

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    30:52 "Public humiliation as a motivator for innovation" - I'm gonna write that one down ;)

    • @gatyair82
      @gatyair82 11 месяцев назад

      There's some irony there, since throughout these lectures he lays in to the students for not understanding basic concepts.

    • @AdityaMehendale
      @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

      @@gatyair82 though i see where he comes from... For a premiere institute, perhaps the "MIT of the north", the enthusiasm of the students seems lukewarm. This is not a 101-level course - it is a 4xx. (so 4th year Uni students?) One would expect them to know their Lenz law from their Lorentz-force. The lack of such 'prerequisite' knowledge might defeat Prof. Gelbart's efforts. Mixed feelings.

    • @adammontgomery7980
      @adammontgomery7980 8 месяцев назад

      @@AdityaMehendale agreed. What an opportunity to interact with Prof. Gelbart. Most people that intelligent, and successful probably aren't good communicators like him. I think I've watched the lecture on tellurometers 4-5 times, wishing I could be there.

    • @AdityaMehendale
      @AdityaMehendale 8 месяцев назад

      @@adammontgomery7980 The "Rapid prototyping" episodes on his own channel too, I hope :)

    • @weinihao3632
      @weinihao3632 8 месяцев назад

      @@AdityaMehendaleWhile it's true, that the students show a surprising lack of enthusiasm, given these lectures are fantastic, some of Gelbarts questions are phrased in such an ambiguous way that it is not possible to answer them correctly. For instance: "Why is the ground connected to neutral outside your house?". In my house (TN-C-S-System) the ground (the PE wire in the house as well as the earth connection of the building frame) is connected to the neutral wire inside(!) the house at one defined point, in front of the RCD. Old installations (TN-C-System) even use a single common N&PE connector (connect them together in each power socket inside(!) the house).

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    Would adding a polarizer and a quarter wave plate to the sniper-scope make it "invisible"?

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    The passive-microwave "bug" 27:00 , if you are interested, is explained in detail here: ruclips.net/video/NLDpWrwijE8/видео.html

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    58:50 another good analogy for a tellurometer is that of a wall-clock. There are three "hands" - hours, minutes, and seconds. As such, you can visually resolve one second in a half day (20 parts per million). This precision is afforded as, during the period (i.e. half a day) the three hands always have a unique combinatorial position. Any fine error in reading the hours-hand can be corrected by looking at the minutes-hand and so on.

    • @MrFujinko
      @MrFujinko 6 месяцев назад

      The same idea can be applied to the motion of the planets. Thank you for your work commenting on the videos.

    • @jbay088
      @jbay088 4 месяца назад

      That's true, but a tellurometric clock would have three hands that all move at almost the same rate, ticking each 1s, 1.016667s and 1.018056s.

    • @AdityaMehendale
      @AdityaMehendale 4 месяца назад

      @@jbay088 Correct, indeed, but presumably the "measurand" is not the ticks, but instead the relative differences between the ticks, and *this* secondary quantity shall move like the hands-of-the-clock (slow vs. med vs. fast) behaviuor.

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    Interesting note: 41:12 The "printed inductive loops" scheme is also used on most "tablet-pen-digitizers" - Wacom and whatnot.

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    Errata: At 11:12, the envelope shall be that of a phase modulation (i.e. shaped like a fullwave rectified sinewave) rather than (the illustrated) AM at 100% depth of modulation

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    1:16:48 - an interesting question that nobody asked: The angle alpha is lambda/d --> for non-monochromatic light, how can the beam-combiner (mirror on the blackboard-sketch) be practically implemented? Remember - the two (+1 and -1 order) beams shall now be split into a 'rainbow'.

    • @sebaschtl9710
      @sebaschtl9710 10 месяцев назад

      also not clear for me. maybe some sharp filter bevor? No the different angels from different Lambda bring F1 and F2 on different places on the screen. so each frequency has there own spot ?!? Oh, You mentioned it allready and write the "rainbow" ... yes it should be a rainbow. it is very interessting to read your comments, Thanks.

    • @AdityaMehendale
      @AdityaMehendale 10 месяцев назад

      @@sebaschtl9710 Cheers, mate! I take it that you have already binge-watched all 18 "rapid prototyping" videos on Prof. Gelbart's own channel, as well his other videos (lathe, metal 3d-printing, etc.?

    • @sebaschtl9710
      @sebaschtl9710 9 месяцев назад

      @@AdityaMehendale yes I watched them all : ) can you recommend other channels?

    • @AdityaMehendale
      @AdityaMehendale 9 месяцев назад

      @htl9710 AppliedScience (BenKrasnow), Alex Slocum (MIT), Matthias Wandel, StuffMadeHere, BreakingTaps, Stefan Gotteswinter, CEE Australia, HuygensOptics, AlphaPhoenix...

    • @jbay088
      @jbay088 4 месяца назад

      It's an interesting question indeed. Not as easy as it looks. One way is to use a second, stationary grating instead of a mirror. Another option might be to use a lens, because the "rainbow" of diffracted points are all diverging from a common origin, and so can all be focused to a common point.

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    43:05 Michelson wished to use it to (dis)prove ether, ironically, 100 years later, the same basic experiment was used to demonstrate gravitational waves :)

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    For the explanation at 2:58 - Remember, if you wish to readout the sensor electronically, you's STILL need _quadrature_ or something equivalent. One way to achieve is to use a Vernier-disk as the stationary disk. In other words - if your main encoder wheel has 1000 stripes, you make the stationary disk with 1001. Then two detectors can resolve quadrature. If you are worried about eccentricity (as in the example of a theodolite) use four detectors, and average cross-wise.

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    35:14 interesting about 950nm is that this wavelength is highly absorbed by (atmospheric) water-vapor, meaning that sensors at this wavelength are relatively unaffected by sunlight - most of the 950nm from sunlight is eliminated by atmospheric water-vapor.

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    Interesting new development - most red and IR-sensitive photoelectric compositions (especially emitters) are highly temperature-sensitive. Gallium nitride, on the other hand, is less so. If insensitivity to temperature is critical, and immunity to ambient light can be provided in a different manner, it is often advantageous to use GaN or InGaN based optical devices - either blue, directly, or photon-converted amber (PC Amber) if using conventional (Si-based) photodiodes that don't like blue wavelengths 33:14 .

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    Errata - plants don't absorb 30:36 green (one of the mysteries of evolution, as to why this evolved this way - perhaps availability of chlorophyll-like molecules?) - rather they reflect it, preferentially absorbing red and blue.

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    11:28 (errata) *Odd* multiples, 120 Hz, 360 Hz, etc.

  • @gatyair82
    @gatyair82 11 месяцев назад

    I'm binging these lectures. Thank you for the upload.

  • @gatyair82
    @gatyair82 11 месяцев назад

    I think that if the video quality was improved, these lectures would gain more traction. Big thanks to the uploader and Dan Gelbart for this awesome content.

  • @AdityaMehendale
    @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

    1:06:10 - I take issue with the statement "the phase shift can be much more than 180 degree" --> How? In a 2nd order resonant system, it shall be _exactly_ 180 degree at its worst. A sharp resonance-peak makes the transition from 0 deg to 180deg _much_ faster, when sweeping frequency, but it will never exceed 180 deg, no matter how high the system-Q. @OP - do you perhaps have an explanation to the meaning of this statement?

    • @theA731N
      @theA731N 7 месяцев назад

      I think he’s speaking in terms of the feedback control levels.

    • @AdityaMehendale
      @AdityaMehendale 7 месяцев назад

      @@theA731N Okay, for the sake of argument, plot x/F [m/N] i.e. 'mechanical gain' on the y-axis and frequency [rad/s] on the x-axis. For the 2nd order system, let the mass be *m* and stiffness of your cantilever be *k* . The resonance-peak shall appear at *sqrt(k/m)*. Far before resonance, the x and the F shall be in phase, i.e. the so called "stiffness line" following F = k.x , i.e. the phaseshift shall be zero. Far right of the resonance peak, the mass shall dominate on the co called "mass line", primarily following F = 1/(m.s^2). The s^2 in the denominator already tells you that the phaseshift shall be exactly -180 degrees. between the left of the resonance and the right of the resonance, lies the resonance itself. Here, the system-damping shall dominate the response, and the phaseshift between F and dx/dt shall be zero, in other words, the phaseshift of x/F shall be -90 degree (aka -pi/2 rad). I agree that the rate of change of phaseshift shall be enormous, for a system with low damping, i.e. a high q-factor, as the value rapidly changes from 0 to -180deg ; however, the phaseshift shall merely be pi/2 near the resonance-frequency.

    • @dgelbart
      @dgelbart 6 месяцев назад

      The phase shift can be much more than 180 degrees. One example is if you have a delay in the loop. Imagine a delay line of T in the loop followed by a resonant system resonating at frequency f. If 1/f<T/2 the phase shift is always more than 180 degrees. CAn be thousands of degrees for a large T.

    • @AdityaMehendale
      @AdityaMehendale 6 месяцев назад

      @@dgelbart Thanks for the clarification! I was thinking of the "second order system" you mentioned at 1:05:50. An ideal delay-line could indeed introduce phaseshift without increasing system-order. Still one thing bugging me, though - you mention about "the slope of the plot" 1:06:35 corresponding with the phaseshift. I completely agree on the "-6dB/octave" part. However, near the resonance-peak itself, (in the absence of delay lines, but for a high Q-factor) there can still be a large slope, without it being indicative of a large phaseshift - what am I missing?

    • @dgelbart
      @dgelbart 6 месяцев назад

      To clarify further: what I said in the lectures needs correction. It is true that in a multi-pole system each pole adds 90 deg phase shift and 6dB/Octave slope to the Bode plot. It is also true that a second order (2 pole) resonant system can only add 180 phase shift, as you pointed out. However, every amplifier or "plant" has a built in delay and the delay adds a phase shift that can be arbitrarily high. Actually, without this delay a second order negative feedback system will never oscillate as the phase shift never reaches 180 degree, it just approaches it assymptotically. Thanks for pointing this out! Dan

  • @sebaschtl9710
    @sebaschtl9710 Год назад

    it is so great to see all those lectures. Thanks a lot. How did you become the videos? Are you student of Gelbart?

  • @JakePoznanski
    @JakePoznanski Год назад

    Great lecture series, but 1/3000 error in the gravity case is 0.03% not 0.3%!

    • @AdityaMehendale
      @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

      Good catch. Also, the buoyant (lower atmospheric pressure and whatnot) forces will dominate over gravity - a liter of air is 1.3g at sea-level, ~ 0.8g at 1km up. --> 0.5g error if measuring a liter of water i.e. 0.05%

    • @AdityaMehendale
      @AdityaMehendale 11 месяцев назад

      PS, that does not detract fron the brilliance of Dan Gelbart as a teacher :)

  • @sebaschtl9710
    @sebaschtl9710 Год назад

    very nice to see more Dan Gelbart videos! But the quality is not good...

  • @franciscoanconia2334
    @franciscoanconia2334 Год назад

    WE NEED MORE OF DAN GELBART!

  • @kubancossack8496
    @kubancossack8496 Год назад

    Thank you for this priceless lecture of this great engineer.

  • @cylosgarage
    @cylosgarage Год назад

    I am so hype to watch all these. Thank you so much

    • @sebaschtl9710
      @sebaschtl9710 Год назад

      @cyclosgarage Hello, I watched also all of your videos! It is great so see whats possible. Good luke! : ) greetings from germany