Видео

How do you select the 24 cars

@@winstonsmith8597 Ofc use the fov to your liking. Like i said in my video, these calculators give way too low values. But you still can see with a lower fov. Just move the camera position back. I encourage everyone to experiment around with it, to find the optimum value. Just keep in mind that within the usable spectrum a lower fov is better than a higher one as you can see the movement of the car better. The higher the fov, the bigger is the movement between the car and the horizon. Thus, high fov values make impossible to see tiny movements of the car. Looking at pro drivers, everyone uses a low fov. It’s just impossible to compete at esports level without using the benefit of a low fov.

those descriptions are ish bruh, it would understand less lol

@@MrKompiri That is literally the purpose of racing - going as fast as possible around the corners

@@seydlitz_racing This is counterproductive if you go too fast around corners and understeering and sliding around the corners.There is a fine line between productive and counterproductive and at least especially in this video you are unfortunately over the line IMO. P.s no hate...

@@MrKompiri Which kind of lap times are you doing on the RB Ring Mr. Expert?

@@seydlitz_racing 🤦🏻‍♂️Ok just forget it... Have fun, sorry for bothering you.

Don't misunderstand me. I always appreciate feedback about my vides. But as someone who is driving Lamborghini esports and as someone who is ranked in the top 1000 ACC drivers worldwide, the driving is probably the least of my concerns. Cheers

What are you talking about? On the first run all 6 laps were within 2 tenths. On the second run i aborted some invalid laps, hence why they are slower. On the final run the setup was undrivable and I am confident to say that i got the most out of it. The conclusion is not purely based on the lap times but also personal feeling. It is a fact that the first GPT setup was even more understeery on throttle than the preset (even though i asked chat gpt to fix the understeer in throttle). Also it is factual that the drivability on the second GPT setup was extremely poor. Based on these results, we ABSOLUTELY can draw the conclusion that Chat GPT can not build perfect setups. One final wird on the lap times: Keep in mind that both the aggressive preset and the GPT setup are absolutely awful. With my own quali setup i am doing 1:27,4 in these conditions (optimum track + 22°C). This is HIGHLY competitive and 99% of ACC players can't even do this in a GT3. I am very proud on these testing results and i would never publish them i wasn't 100% sure that they are representative and that they fulfil my high quality demand.

Can you elaborate? :D

@@seydlitz_racing He probably means giving the setups a limited set of attributes that you liek to influence and use in your prompts, like oversteer, grip, straight speed, corner speed etc. and matching all the settings with a weight system like -3 to 3 to them and of course which values impacts this in which way, so you can be sure that on your first question for more rotation maybe only TC is affected as well as settings that differ from a leveled out base setup. So the other settings and their fine-tuning only change after further prompts. The current representation is not far away from hitting random with a bit of bias that ChatGPT injects

I still came to see the results tho. Definitely curious

@@SamuelRichter7 Puh das kann ich nicht so genau sagen. Dauert bei mir immer etwas länger. Es gibt aktuell kein einzigen Setup Guide auf RUclips der die einzelnen Einstellungen gescheit erklärt. Alles viel zu oberflächlich. Daher wird mein Video etwas aufwändiger und technischer. Deshalb werde ich mir dafür Zeit lassen, damit das Video auch so wird wie ich mir das vorstelle und ich nicht ein halb fertiges video hochlade. Also rechne mal lieber nicht zu bald damit :D

@@seydlitz_racing Das hab ich schon bei deinen Videos gemerkt: Wenn Du eins machst, dann machst Du es richtig :) Deswegen freu ich mich auch drauf.

@@seydlitz_racing Geduld ist eine Tugend. Wir warten gerne ;)

😅

I think there are 2 things you can do: 1. Hold the inside line. This can be beneficial if there is not so much time to be gained after exiting the corner, because there is no long straight after the corner. Zandvoort T1 is an example to this, I think. All the time to be gained is in the speed carried through the corner. 2. The Lewis Hamilton-style double-apex. He explained this in the Gran Turismo Sport promo video, which you can watch on the PlayStation RUclips channel. The approach gives the corner two apexes. You carry more speed in the entry, kiss the apex once while slowing the car, and you turn the car after you passed the inside line, and are towards the middle of the track. After turning, you accelerate, touch the apex the second time, and slingshot out of the corner for maximum exit speed, which is then carried all the way to the end of the following straight. One of the best examples is Silverstone Luffield (T7 F1 version, start-finish straight is the Hamilton-Straight), and Nürburgring T7.

Agreed, AMS2 got the sound a bit more realistic. Especially the whine from the gearbox is really accurate

I think there are many reasons for the current TC off meta. The diff giving you the best traction at the lowest setting surely contributes to that as well. The problem with the throttle response is that no one really knows how the engine behaves on partial throttle application. This is because modern cars all have an electronic throttle valve, which means that throttle input does not correlate 1:1 with the angle of the throttle valve, but instead the ecu controls the throttle valve based on a given value from the throttle position sensor. With the calibration of the ecu, a lot of the non-linearity between throttle valve angle and air pressure inside of the intake (and thus power) will get cancelled out as the ecu opens the trottle valve only slightly in the lower part of throttle input and much more rapidly in the higher part. It can even go as far as making the throttle input 100% linear to power output of the engine. But unfortunately afaik the cars haven’t been dyno‘d with a partial throttle application and thus no one really knows how the engine behaves in this part.

Haha thank you. Since the video covered a lot of different topics, I tried to keep it short and straight to the point, so the video isn't 1 hour long. Might go more into detail in future videos. Glad you liked it :)

Keep it simple 👌

In case you mean the part of the HUD in the bottom right, it stands for force feedback. It is not turned off for me, ACC just doesn't record the ff trace in the replay. So for the background videos that i recorded from an existing replay, there is just no ff being shown. For the videos that i record live, for example at 1:45 , you can see the ff display working. The further the bar is to the right, the stronger is the ff. Hope this helps you

@@seydlitz_racing wow thanks for this quick message you just got a subscriber!!!!!

It's a very important setting for the correct view. Only changing the fov without changing the distance would really mess up your view

@@seydlitz_racing I'll be moving it later next time running ACC

Yeah I've been waiting for 0:00, defo gonna be starting up earlier in future. Also, flicking the ignition off before coming to a complete stand still too!