Видео

Its cool to think of how these apply outside of gambling too

technically poker hands arent all independant since previous play will influence the way others play around you

My personal favorite is the fallacy fallacy: analyzing an argument and inferring that, since it contains a fallacy, its conclusion must be false.

These dont just apply to religion, these apply to politics, beliefs, everything

most of these fallacies are done by atheists rather than by religious apologetics

Those are 98% just... regular fallacies that anyone can commit

While there are some people that make these arguments, they’re entirely surface level and most religious scholars don’t hold these beliefs (or use these logical fallacies when arguing for the existence of an intelligent creator). They’re basically fifth grade level apologetics, and knocking them down is a straw man argument in it of itself. They also aren’t actually religious fallacies, you just picked logical fallacies and inserted a religious context in them.

How are these specificly religios beliefs? These are just logical fallacies in a religios context. These are not religious in nature. You probably could have just made a video on these as fallacies rather than something that has to do with religion its unbecoming

Bullshit, 99% of gambler quit before- *_explodes from unoriginality_*

The way somebody rolls the dice in craps absolutely has an effect on the game, same goes for spinning a roulette wheel the dealer does it millions of times a week

I got an amazon add on this video about how they want to reduce climate impact with paper packaging...

im confused. how does aggressive marketing lead to child malnutrition and death? weren't the babies being fed before? why didn't they keep feeding them the way they did before formula if it wasn't affordable?

I mean, are there even any *good* companies?

You put pfizer on there and didn't get a strike? Surprising.

That's Part 1 complete? Need a few more parts

I’m so tired of peoples understand of black rock. They are an asset manager who manages peoples money like you and I. They’re job is to maximize shareholder profit. However they don’t do it in this evaluation way that everyone thinks. If they did people would stop using them. So it’s actually bad business for them to do what your saying

Like i know its statistically independent but i have gotten KQ off, pocket 10s, A9 suited in a row That was a good night

Where the hell is Wish and TEMU

Where’s Apple?

Im supprised theres no BP, transport for London and BBC

in 2 days he commited suicide with ten shots to the back of the head

3:06 in the where!???

Privatizing water is wild

Great video, you got a new loyal subscriber. Nearly all these companies terrible practices can be boiled down to the widespread adoption of capitalism where profits are put above all else. Thank you for shedding more light on this!

Nice:) good to know

Like how you don't steal content keep it up

Nice video bro 👍✨✨👌, i feel knowledgeable now with this information amf the fact yoy make it entertaining with the use of animated icond is the cherry on top ❤

I immediately assumed this was a chess thing lol I misread gambling as gambit

kinda find myself in some explanations

A company named siemen

now I realized my town has the shitiest casinos ever if this liuxury is suppose to be the default

Sometimes, if the person has a fear of intimacy, projests or has lack of self insight, they might sull be interested in you, but difficult expressing it.

Can you do this for video games

I got a gambling app ad while watching this

For the Dunning-Kruger effect in poker, I’d look to examples like the guy who decides that because he usually wins in a weekly home game where no one is playing seriously and the stakes are low that he should go to Vegas and play high stakes games (where, in practice, said player will get skinned alive by the pros who mostly populate said games and are waaaay more skilled than anyone he’s ever played before.)

Just as a point of order, many of your “examples” don’t actually hold true in practice or apply to all cases. Most craps players are not skilled or knowledgeable enough about how to throw dice to control the outcome, but a very small fraction (probably something like .0001%) can learn to throw rolls that aren’t 7s consistently. The most skilled among this group might even be skilled enough to make a desired outcome more likely. It is a tough skill to learn and generally takes a lot of practice, but they do exist. A lot of your poker related examples are also (and this is coming from someone who played professionally) a little off. A player who wins a couple pots in a row might actually be more likely to win the next pot based on his table image (people get frustrated losing big bets over and over to the same player, so they become more likely to fold to that player’s bets when that player’s wins are fresh in their minds.) It isn’t about “hot hands” or “overconfidence” on the player’s part (and if that’s the justification for the player’s actions, they are committing the fallacies as you describe them) but rather how the table perceives them. To say it another way, if I’ve just shown down three straight winning hands involving big bets being paid off, it is pretty likely that my opponents will assume a 4th big bet on the next hand will also be my having a strong hand and as such, will be inclined to not pay me off, making bluffing in this spot a more profitable play than it normally is. Of course, this could also work the opposite way (the opponents decide I can’t keep winning every pot and must eventually be bluffing) so it is on the player to decide what sorts of adjustments their opponents are making to respond to the player’s winning streak- my point ultimately is that it isn’t necessarily a fallacy to think that winning consecutive pots doesn’t have a snowball effect in terms of how your opponents respond, which in turn can increase your chances of winning the next one.

Poker is a bad example of hot hand fallacy since there is an element of player to player interaction involved. A player with the winning hand is not necessarily the player who wins in the end. Hot hand fallacy in poker can also work in a players favor when opponents fold potentially winning hands. This is unless the game is played against the house where the outcome is only decided by the cards in play.

nice

Tell me you know nothing about Poker, without telling me you know nothing about Poker'

Near miss is one of the most diabolical of the list

Loss aversion is a good thing

So what you’re saying is i’m due?

This guy clearly knows nothing about stats, gambling, dedication and skill.

Can't you at least increase your chances of rolling something by rolling the dice by for example trying to only roll it along one axis?

Deep state propaganda, trying to stop all us gamblers from getting a gazillion dollars from the big win I’m gonna get after selling my 4th child and my 2nd child’s kidney

One thing I have always remembered from my high school maths was in a class called Statistics and Probablities. The opening line of the subject was "Dice have no memory." They don't know that you're "due."

Wait, Poker isn't entirely statistically independent no? The shoe isn't reset to an initial state/shuffled each time cards are used thus recently shown cards are less likely to appear.

Bro is trying to suppress my dedication

I remember wandering into a casino and hearing “ Take the money and run” by Steve Miller, and thinking; this should NOT be a song allowed on their playlist… 🤔

Half of these were just repeats