Видео

I know :) And it will for a few more years :)

You are welcome :)

Thanks for the info. But already all that you wrote is too much work for the result I need :)

Yes, I know it's a fork, and I tried xmms but there was something not to my liking that made me switch to audacious, can't remember exactly what it was.

Glad you like it :)

You can use it in any Linux distro you want.

You are welcome :)

It's like you didn't watch the video at all...

Permissions are exactly why I despise flatpak, when I started to use Linux I needed a couple of packages to do what I needed and they wouldn't talk to each other or the system properly. I get WHY the idea of isolating the software is in high regard as well as easily updated and maintained, but my deity ASK ME TO GIVE ACCESS instead of requiring the use of the terminal - ASK, even iOS and Android do this effortless thing. Can't use Blender properly through Flatpak because it's isolated and can't talk to the GPU for more efficient rendering, i HAVE TO use the terminal to force permissions, and no Flatseal doesn't help. (This isn't the only software I've had issues with, just a good example). "The program requests read and write permissions, do you want to give permission? Press Yes - No" "The program requests access to the following hardware, do you want to give permission? Press Yes - No" That's it, not that hard. Linux already has password protection for kernel/system-level installs. I shouldn't have to use the terminal for such a small thing.

@@Ohem1 I know what you are talking about. I remeber using flameshot as flatpak at the begining and not being able to paste anything in other application installed by flatpak. But I didin't go to terminal for solution, I just deleted every app that I had installed as flatpak, and took the appimages instead :)

BSD has different reasons for existing and purposes and yet they have that figured out. I would say many egos thinking their ways is better than others.

@@friendlyalien379 It's not really an ego thing. It is not possible to have a package manager on Linux that is extremely lightweight and has upstream support on every distribution. Either you make it lightweight and have support on only one system, or you make it robust and heavy and give support to every system. Each system's package manager opts for the former, while flathub opts for the latter.

@@mathgeniuszach Define lightweight. Do you really think I care about few mb more if it would mean that all the developers would need to put only one package for every distro? Still, appimage is light years aways from every other package manager. Flapacks are gonna be nightmare of bloated mess with their runtimes, just wait :)

​@@friendlyalien379 I don't mean lightweight as just filesize (though that is part of it, packaging in extra libraries costs more than a few mb, especially expensive ones). Lightweight means it interacts directly with your system and the way it's set up with little to no overhead. It also means that it is simple. Packaging for all systems doesn't just require you to include more libraries in - it requires dealing with distro-specific oddities such as differences in FHS, development cycles, low-level programs, etc. As a very simple example, what do you want? The most up-to-date software, or older and more likely stable software. Some systems choose the former, others choose the latter. But to choose both means hosting both, maintaining both, and fixing both. This is called "overhead". To get the best of both worlds, you must sacrifice the lightweight simplicity of one and account for both. Thus, you cannot have both a "lightweight" system and support everyone.

I covered that in my fish shell video which was just the video before this one.

You are welcome :)

@@friendlyalien379 XDG_MENU_PREFIX=arch- kbuildsycoca6 how add startup ?

Thank you so much

Great!

You just put it in config file of a shell shell that you are running. You can see it in the end of the video.

😄

Absolutely!

@@renner0395 restarting app doesn't work, nor it should. Because flatpak don't ask flatseal do I have this and that permission. You don't even have to have flatseal installed to run permission commands, you can run them from the terminal. And if you looked at the whole video I deleted the xdg permission and application still had access. And yes flatpak is run as regular user, and permission from that user are applied, not from flatpak. Meaning they can do everything as any other app, so when you say little sandboxing that is not exactly true. And at the statetmant it is the best for Linux that we have right now, I will just say look at my appimages video :)

@@ankur-dhama well that xdg portal has to be defined as xdg-download or something else, but if you look at the video even with that permission gone it still doesn't respect what I can do or not. For firofox if I'm downloading something I can't really go from terminal can I? I didn't check how a flatpak is respecting permissions from terminal, because that beats the whole purpose of running apps installed from flatpak.

@@marcmulzer Thank you.

@@drumpf4all Thanks :)

@@drumpf4all I thought that RUclips was lying when I got a few view right after I published my video, but your comment proves me wrong :)

I know what they are trying to solve with flatpak, but "sandboxing" is something that is promoted so much, but it's complete lie. I don't need sandboxing, I'm well aware that you can't sandbox application if you want to do anything with your files, which I said in the video. Maybe not that clearly. I just don't know why appimage hasn't been chosen, they are much more practical IMO, from user standpoint. I will explain that in my next video about appimages :)

@@friendlyalien379 I wouldn't say that it is a complete lie but a missunderstanding what is actually meant here. IMO is the sandbox that is created for a flatpak app not for security but to provide that said app could run on any distro without inflicting a dependency hell. Yes there are problems with Flatpaks and the Flathub like downloading speed or that Flatpak doesn't remove older runtimes that aren't relevant to the system anymore and require a manual deletion.

@@gelbphoenix if it was only in the sense of sandboxing because of the libraries, than yes I would I agree you could call it sandboxing, but it's not. I remember long time ago when I tried using freefilesync as a flatpak, there was no permission I could turn on to make it sync to my external disk. Or when I tried to use keepassxc with Firefox, all flatpaks of course, it wouldn't work. In the definition of flatpak you have description where it says that you have to explicitly allow access to user files, which is not the case because it doesn't work. So they clearly meant sandbox more than just including the libraries.

​@@friendlyalien379 That happens more in Flatpaks that aren't maintained by the maintainer of the actual project. Because the maintainer of an project can check if their Flatpak version functions like it should and make the needed permissions in the manifest file.

@@gelbphoenix it's more like at that time flatpaks couldn't do "anything" where as now they do whatever they want ;}

@@carlocorderotv4676 Thank you

@@ranilmadawalage1897 Thank you for your kind words 😊

You add this option to fastfetch: --logo-color-1 blue numbers are different parts of fastfetch display

@@svan71 the color might be impacted by the color scheme of your terminal. Because fastfetch is a simple program, it does very simple things. The other option is to show custom logo. If you give me more info on what you are using I might be able to help you.

@@friendlyalien379 It's just the default Arch Linux logo it's teal, and I was trying to make it blue. I created the config folder, but I don't see the logo option. Also, the colors 1-9 I don't see what colors the numbers represent. Thanks for your video :)

@@svan71 I will see what can be done and let you know

@@svan71 ok, try this line and tell me if this is what you wanted fastfetch --logo-color-1 blue --logo-color-2 blue blue, if i'm not mistaken, is defined by your terminal color scheme

Glad it was helpful!

@@devTalks3641 Dead in the sence the project hasn't been updated since 2020, yes. But things still work, mostly.

@@PlatinumArms You're welcome 😉

Thanks 😊

@@drumpf4all Git is good for backup, but still has more steps 😊

@@sergiop888 You are welcome ☺️

You mean like bar on top of the terminal? As far as I know you don't have that with alacritty. You have only toml file where you edit all your options.

@@friendlyalien379 Yeah that only from which we can split terminal into multiple windows and drag and adjust the terminal

@@HarshilBadminton for multiple terminals in alacritty you can use tmux, but that's another program to configure. Alacritty is really basic terminal emulator that is fast.

@@surajkpanigrahi No, never. This is xfce terminal, but I usually use konsole.

@@vinhphamquang8209 Thanks for sharing. I am always interested in how other people do things. You can always learn something new.

@@Leandromunoz97 if you want security and privacy, you shouldn't use email at all. Because no email will ever be secure or private because of the nature it functions. I use tuta, not because I think they are secure and private, but because they have desktop and mobile app on free tier. And they are not Gmail :)

@@friendlyalien379 i like tuta but free version not support search option

That's no excuse. And how do you define who is a scamer a who is not? Scamer can also create legit email with stolen number and how will people from Proton know? Unless you ask for people"s id on video call and you are connected to police to actually check that, there is no way for anybody to know if you are who you say you are. And where is your privacy if you have to give anything that can identify you?

​@@friendlyalien379 I get your point but a lot of scammers and skids use services such as proton and tuta to send spam or make threats. Because of this a lot of sites do not accept tuta or proton and you're forced to use Gmail or something similar. The extra email verification helps stop some of these scammers and it only pop ups if your ip range has been used before for abuse. Email providers keep a list of abused ip, domains, etc

​@@friendlyalien379maybe they could have a similar thing to disroot where you email is active after 2 weeks If I remember correctly or have private invites like how cock li used to have

@@space_cowboy007 You can delete the dot from the megaingnore file, and it should sync the hidden files and directories.

@@bigchill07 I'm glad it helped :)

Thanks