Видео

so stupid that you have to adjust this. also when you updated a citation source from the mendeley app, these would not apply on that. So useless

Hi ma'am, In Micom Analysis i got mean and variance are not equal results is it Partial Invarinace? Which results i should use only Bootstrap results? why Can i use Parametric/weltch satterthwait test too ? if we can use why ? or if not why?

Thanks,! All in 1min. No bs or time wasting. Really appreciate it!

Thank you for the information. I have two questions first how can I report this result in my article and second is there a reference for it?

Hello, What it means if p-value not zero

thanks for this

Checking the Convergent and Discriminant validity through Correlation matrix is for the initial stage only right ? How do you differentiate this method through, Average Variants extracted through factor analysis and the Composite Reliability method ? Or through CFA method ?

The best explanation for this topic i have come across till now.

can we compare the indirect and total effect or just the path coefficients?

Once, we update the model, how to run the model again with the updated data.

Can you share your email address? i have a quick question

Hello

Ma'am, in my variable choosing dialog box no unique value is showing up for gender. Also on running permutation multi group analysis it is giving singular matrix problem. How to resolve these ?

please how do i contact you via email???

Thank you for useful guide on the issue. I have a problem, "Latent variable is not connected to other latent variable" is causing no result. How can I fix the issue? Please reply me.

Thank you so much should all items be correlated at a significant level? Or is it ok if some items do not fulfil this condition?

is MGA a licence-only feature? I only have PLS SEM algorithm and Bootstrapping as calculation options

Thank you soooooo much❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

maam if we get negative results then what can we do to correct them?

Hey ma'am Need your email address please to discuss my methodology

Dear madam, if 2 variables in MICOM Step 2, p values are significant, can I proceed with step 3?

Thank you for your kindness but I really need your advise , In my data, the results of Bootstrapping results shown that a few relationships are different between two groups but I used the results of Bootstrap MGA which are any significance different between all variances of the two groups I am curious that which results should I use?? A few other researches suggest both of the results, and it makes me confused I want to know the manual on when to use the Bootstrapping method and when to use the Bootstrap MGA method, and the case of above researches, how would you discuss of those different results? Because I don't understand that how can we claim difference between the groups even if there was non significant difference results from Bootstrap MGA It's been a while since you posted this video, but I'd really appreciate it if you could answer

eyvallah hoca

Such a helpful video mam. Thank you for sharing with us.

presenting skills are awesome. i must appreciate your techniques. how you are making our understanding by giving examples.👍

Mam...thank you for your video. I'm following it step by step. But when I started calculating, I encountered singular matrix problem. Before I generate the moderating variables, I have no problem in calculating the result. But now I have this singular matrix problem. Can you help me, please??? Thanks in advance

Thanks a lot

if we have two numbers in row of rotated compnent matrix, which of these numbers should place in firs column?

Assalamualaikum mam ! How we reverse code our items in smart pls 4

Is there any kind of article in which this method is applied that you can point to?

Mam you when you imported the data,there was a indication at the bottom saying 9 values are missing. What does that mean and why is it showing?

great lecture

If the HTMT value rather than. 85 what can i do to change this value??? I wanna published

Hi Dr Thank you for the video. My model developed is a reflective third-order construct - for the independent variable. e.g: IV --> constructs --> sub-constructs --> indicators Currently, the IV, constructs and sub-constructs are in red, except the indicators are all blue. To calculate using Latent Variable Score; 1. Do I need to include all indicators in the respective constructs and sub-constructs as well to turn it blue? Since there is an error in the model, it shows the path invalid. 2. Or by right, the constructs and sub-constructs should be blue already although I don't put all the indicators in IV and subsconstructs? TQ

Best and simplified explanation l have watched so far. Thank you 😊

Thank you so much mam, it's so nice of you to upload such valuable video.

How we can do without mendeley??

Thank you

You are a life saving GEM!!! Thank you!!!

Thanks but the video lacks clarity

Is the validity also affected by the size of sample? I use the sample size of 30 and it shows less correlation among several indicators in some variables.

Thank you so much. That’s really informative! I am interested to use this technique to calculate the convergen and discriminate validity of within the same assessment A. My question is that ok to do that or I have to the compare and calculate convergent validity to assessment B and compare the discriminante validity to assessment C.

Hello, I did the factor analysis and for the rotated component matrix I got variables without any component value, some variables with more than one component value and also variables with a negative component value. Is it still possible to test for discriminant validity and how can I continue?

Hello, thank you for the explanation. I wanna ask, what if I face partial measurement invariance, should I still show the result of Henseler's MGA or the bootstrapping results is enough? thank you!

Mam after running bootstrapping analysis which one is hensler p vale and permutation p value..plz explain

"Check for duplicate" option is not available in Tools menu. What to do?

ma, if a latent variable among others have the following: cronbach Alpha = 0.655, Rho_a = 0.662, Rho_c = 0.813 & AVE = 0.593; can i proceed with my analysis owing to the fact that cronbach Alpha and Rho_a are less than 0.7 and are showing red in SmartPLS 4.

Mam my 5th objective in my thesis is gender as moderator I have achieved 4 objectives but i am bit confused mam do i have to perform MGA on full model I mean do i have to check measurement models reliablity ave htmt and other things also while running this mga or itz just one step which you show in model Becoz i have 4 objectives also on impact When I put gender what will happen to my model and values will there be any change

Mam can we show data linearity through qq plots is it correct way to show linearity through qq plots

Excellent video. With respect: Never expected any good video from Karachi, Pakistan. May be as an Indian I had a bias. Big thanks.