Видео

you are not wrong, i will update the V0.2 soon, and it should have a main/recommended option

Did you fix it? I would like to make one too

Lol or just very lazy to bother😂

If you have to manually level the bed youre not serious about 3d printing at all

@@Fantastika Turning 4 screws is too difficult, for you.

@@tazanteflight8670 my ABL will have better first layer accuracy than you can ever hope to achieve

But that set up is very cool. Is it set up for 0 xy offset?

the objective is to average the errors, you can configure as a single probe. the offset is not 0,but pretty close.

those are the motors turning off, it happen even on switches with a long travel after triggering

try this one, it's now merged with the maib repository github.com/jlas1/Klicky-Probe/tree/main/Printers/Voron/Switchwire

you can find them here: github.com/jlas1/Klicky-Probe/blob/main/Printers/Tiny-M/STL/Tiny-M_STL.stl, the probe parts are here github.com/jlas1/Klicky-Probe/tree/main/Probes/KlickyProbe

do you know where you can get the files and instructions?

Hi, can you share the link for installing and commissioning the probe please? Thank you 👍🏻

Hi, can you share the link for installing and commissioning the probe please? Thank you 👍🏻

sadly no, it needs a dedicated Z endstop that can touch the nozzle and switch body

better immunity from temperature changes with a switch and the possibility to use it as a Z virtual endstop

@@josearaujo5204 you can do the same with a bltouch or an inductive probe

@@pauhull the switch has a better temperature immunity, it does not drift as much. and it's more reliable and cheaper than a bltouch

@@josearaujo5204 a cheap bltouch clone works just as well and isn't as overengineered

@@pauhull you are entitled to your opinion 😎, with that said, there are multiple probe options, this is just one of them

you can check the github from the creator of the unklicky concept, github.com/majarspeed/Unklicky#but-how-does-it-work it has a much better explanation that what i could place here

@@josearaujo5204 Just curious as to why its more accurate.

@@ZorAxe not a definitive answer, we are working on the assumption that the microswitch spring sometimes has a different behavior, the switches need to be more robust and carry a certain current, unklicky has no such requirements or needs

@@ZorAxe the reason why it's more accurate is because it's a simple open close switch instead of measuring the bounce induced by triggering a bl touch

@Jose Araujo i would also say it's so accurate, there's no point in probing each spot 3x or even twice. You can test that in klipper, as I'm sure you know. Also i run you can tweak your dock y location a touch, if you haven't already

thanks, works way better than i expected

One of the design goals of klicky is to allow for the use of virtual Z endstop, the current quickdraw mounts do not support that. This one does, that is why, there is now a version for switchwire. it will also support KlickyNG that has semi enclosed magnets that won't fall off.

it's in the cad here github.com/jlas1/Klicky-Probe/blob/main/CAD/KlickyProbe_v2_v58.step

Great that that solution works for you. most users see an improvement with a microswitch, not the least with the less temperature dependent output.

this is the integrated leadscrew motor that came with this Voron V0 ldo kit, I guess it's black because its faster that way. :-) (don't know why it's black)

@@josearaujo5204 thank you very much 🤓

@@Hunihunor90 I believe it’s black because it’s a POM coating, the same material that the lead screw nut is made out of. Also the same material that V wheels on the Ender style printers is made out of, the material doesn’t have to be lubricated.

@@anthonyplana8140 must get one of these for my voron 0.1 🤩 thanks for the info

@@Hunihunor90 haha yeah I actually just looked it up and POM otherwise known as delrin has around the same coefficient of friction against itself vs against steel but with certain types of Delrin, it actually wears faster against itself than against steel so I’m not sure if having the lead screw coated in delrin is a good choice or not. I’m sure the difference in material choice makes a negligible difference in performance but it would still be an interesting factor to test.

this is more to showcase the probe pickup and docking procedure, the process itself does multiple measurements and calculates the probe (and Z motion system) variance and range.

@@josearaujo5204 Ok, but what does it better than a BL-Touch exept wasting time?

@@oldineamiller9007 it's much better than BL-Touch if you can program the necessary macros, not only this version, but most microswitch's that are magnetically attached. They are very precise and have a low temperature drift. Also on a Voron V0, a BL-Touch would cause the loss of a large portion of the bed ;-)

This is much cheaper to implement and works as good or better than the SuperPinda, and is much more consistent with temperature changes than the original Pinda. Also it looks cool ;-) (completely subjective)

Given how cheap endstops are, it doesn't make sense

This is a belted z printer, I just don't like screws on z

There are some printers already running it, should be released in a few days

It allows adjusting the three screws that level the bed

This version yes, next version, not so much. And still it had good accuracy

As far as accuracy, you are correct, it's displayed more as a reference than a goal. For the correct nozzle to bed distance, it helps adjusting the screws. The ultimate tool would be to test with the nozzle itself, but that brings other problems.

@@josearaujo5204 If you're really after auto setting nozzle to bed clearance then you definitely need to firmly bolt a Z-homing switch up right to the table surface. That would give you a chance to auto set the 1st printing layer clearance regardless of what nozzle/hotend you've changed to. A filler gauge is pretty much enough to set a proper nozzle clearance all over the bed surface as it's area is very small. On bigger printers it's another story of course.

Check out the Kirigami bed mount

With this version, you lose 2mm of print space, there is an integrated cowling being tested that removes that limitation, it only docks at x121

@@josearaujo5204 That's not too bad, thanks for the answer! Looking forward to seeing the intergated cowling version!

on this version, 2mm on the right front corner, there will be a integrated mount that will require a now cowling that does not lose any space

Not yet, I can look into it

Try this exiftool.org/forum/index.php/topic,9623.msg49958.html