Видео

lol, no the mic is on the camera

Thanks, glad you liked it

Thanks, i appreciate the comment. Glad you found it interesting

Very interesting, I appreciate hearing your perspective

Thank you, your comment means a lot to me.

Thanks i appreciate this. I do go outside like this but without the chair and pipe

I am talking about it as in what I personally think is the meaning these things. And intentionally disregarding any particular doctrine that exists in the communities that follow these ideas. I gotta say in terms of predatory alphas, it may be you are projecting a negative masculine sense on this group, I find a lot of these guys a decent people that are integrating aggression into their personality. Which according to Jungian psychology is important otherwise it could cause mental distress, or passive aggression or agitation.

Sir you have a talent with words. But if you watched the video you know that I did not talk about political theory, but about social psychology.

By woke I am referring to people that are not committed to a clear ideology, but a general value, and cares enough about western society. If you find out that they are committed ideologues, to then it’s a different story. But you can press them on jealousy or a power instinct if they are communists. It’s a good suggestion to go outside and debate,

Yeah but you can't be an ubermensch if you don't make vapid assertions about a mythic idyllic past

So far human rights have been won by a positive religious impulse, particularly in America. The Postmodernists were marxists in the sense that their goal was for the proletariat to overthrow the bourgeoisie. At least Foucault clearly stated this goal. One doesn’t overthrow power structures Willy nilly. In the video I state that it is not about economics, and am mostly criticizing the modern authoritarian governments of the past century, and am connecting to how postmodernists think themselves to be clean and brand new, not realizing they are motivated by power drives, and jealous instincts. Postmodern Neo Marxism, also known as woke, is taking the general Marxist pattern and applying it to everything. So for example the kind of feminism we see today, or ethnic politics, in contrast to a more Libertarian approach.

Got a better name for it

Agree with the critique. Marxism entails a materialist theory of history (similar to the Hegelian theory of history) and is not compatible with post-modernism. The ‘post-modern types’ referred to here may be socialist, but they can’t be proper marxists. Tbh, I think the response above is just a superficial rehashing of _The Tarantulas._ People used a religious justification (a ‘negative religious impulse’) to argue for segregation as well. Religious impulses and religious structures shouldn’t get all the credit or blame here, because it’s actually more complex. The more important point to address is the treatment of labor under capitalism… beginning in the time of the Industrial Revolution. This is what was meant by “human dignity,” and these changes were not motivated by religion.

@@yoseftovshteyn A "positive religious impulse" won human rights? How does that make any sense at all? Yes, MLK was a Christian, but his movement was based on working-class democratic socialist ideas that had been around for a lot longer than him, and he was very well aware of this. The socialists and communists that won workers' rights in the decades before the civil rights movement had very little religious influence- only to the extent that religion was endemic in the community at that point in time. Stop using religion to describe things that are not fundamentally religious. Foucault was not an exemplar of postmodern thought any more than a hundred others I could name, and he himself rejected that label rather strongly. Philosophers who have been grouped under that label do not necessarily have Marxist views at all; you should actually read some of their stuff before you say these things. So you're not talking about economics; you're just very crudely stating one of Foucault's own ideas, and then trying to use that to discredit Foucault. Got it. Again, there is no "postmodern neo-Marxism". Jordan Peterson or Dennis Prager or one of those types came up with that name, and it never made any sense whatsoever. Being "woke" just means you understand that your ancestors probably stole the land you're living on, and maybe you should try and be aware of your own privilege. Not too unreasonable.

Good question. The general idea is to integrate it into your own personality In a positive way, while also maintaining all the other parts of your personality. To achieve more wholeness. Because that feeling that we are noticing is also part of ourselves.

Thank you

Thank you

A common idea is that the Industrial Revolution changed society quickly, and there was a lack of meaning, and stressful events etc. in terms of dark past we could say that the medieval Christians had pagan shadows and they where repressing it in what they called hell. In Carl Jung’s psychology if I have an aggressive instinct I need to integrate it into my personality, to be a more responsible person. And if I repress it I can be easy agitated or passive aggressive, and I’ll be convinced that I’m the calmest one.

Thanks! It is a Peterson churchwarden D16 (rustic)

@yoseftovshteyn found it thanks 🙏

Nice! sounds like a good way to use chatGPT

@@yoseftovshteyn Yeah, it's a lot of fun

Hello, you make a fair point, and it is one that I consider in my thinking process. The theories that we have about physics came from intuitive thinking and mathematics thing and tested with experiments. After quantum physics came about the intuitive ideas were so wild that people had to stop trying to imagine stuff. Whether or not we can advance physics with a philosophical approach, I don’t think it posses any threat to science, but It could pose a threat to an individuals sanity or comfort in feeling like their environment is known.

Needs more (scotch) whisky!

Thank you kindly

Thank you!

glad you enjoyed the video, I am using an Intuitive way of thinking, and in this sense it could be hard to follow in a straight forward way. A great man once termed this technique as “The Weave.”

Don’t watch then. Zero reason to come on and criticize someone for being themselves.

It doesn't really matter. The whole point about RUclips is for users to post whatever they please.

I am literally criticizing the idea that particles split into different universes

​@yoseftovshteyn yes and rightfully so. But those are strawmen of superpostion and entanglement

I am not criticizing anything in terms of actual scientific experiments. Therefore I don’t see why you say I’m straw manning, I am simplifying to get to the idea

@yoseftovshteyn sorry for my disconnect with your point. I realize you're not doing a strawman, but responding to them . My point was they dont bare any weight to ponder as they don't represent any scientific theory properly

Sir, I think you are thinking with too much category. Which certainly sounds smart. In reality I’m not sure that there is a clear boundary between philosophy and religion. Also Stoicism predates Christ, and was popular and well known in some way or another in the area.

@yoseftovshteyn Never said that there is a clear boundary. In my opinion it isn't, but just my opinion. But going back why I wrote this above: punchline from this video is a brutal generalization and IMHO is a great example of faulty generalization. In one word: it's not a very fruitful punchline to say at least.

Logic is a great thing, but it is not the only form of thinking, especially not in philosophy. In this video I am using more Intuition. A great book that solves this conflict is Ian Mcgilchrist’s The Master and his Emissary.

@@yoseftovshteyn Intuition is important too and I'm not neglecting it, but when statement breaks basic logic (that's is just a tool helpful only when used in proper way and for proper aim) one should be aware that is walking on a thin philosophical ice being at risk of hard subjectivism where everyone is right and wrong in the same time. And I know that in some part we are all subjective and we need it in real life but isn't it a philosophy goal to find something more than just subjectiveness?

I can only again recommend Ian Mcgilchrist’s The Master and his Emissary

Thank you, I’m glad you found it helpful

Thanks for watching, glad you enjoyed

Thanks you!

Thank you, glad you found it interesting!

I’m getting the complete opposite feeling

@@christopherwhittaker2620 well I agreed with 0% of what I heard and I think this method of research is complete bogus and should be left where it belongs (the past). I'm just speaking about the YT Channel itself, I'm sure it has a future. The guy is smoking a fucking pipe in fake mustache while shitposting quantum physics. Great content tbf

How do you think we got to where we are? Because of people in the past. This research method is called philosophy, and in a sense it is a lost art, people get very upset at it, possibly as a mechanism for the mind to avoid chaos, and maybe for good reason.

My understanding is that Foucault is the daddy of woke. I’m sure it will be interesting to read him. I have heard the debate between him and Noam Chomsky. Foucault was bent on destroying all social power structures for the sake of it, Chomsky who himself is a anarcho communist, said in a later interview that Foucault was the most Amoral person he had ever spoken too.

@@yoseftovshteyn People often confuse amoral with immoral, and don't understand where Foucault comes from (a critical historical perspective on ideology, power etc. building on relativist and (post)constructivist premises), even though he is otherwise soooo widely read. Personally speaking, I'd expect a person saying anything substantial about wokeism, and someone with a bookshelf like yours to have read at least some Foucault, but I'm sure you'll get to it sooner or later.

The word "evil" can't mean that much to you then. The woke mind feeds on a lot of false righteousness and alienation, but there are degrees of dehumanization and violence that I am sure you are aware of, which exceed even the more extreme principles and goals of wokeness. I say this as a German - not that I think identity matters that much in this matter.

@domsjuk What is evil about wokeness is that sees evil as good and pretends to be good while attacking good. I am brown and a labourer working for less than 4 dollars an hour. Not that I think it matters at all but so you know that not all POC are on the train of the destruction of wokeness.

@domsjuk It (wo...e) is evil but sees itself as good and pretends to be good and have the audacity to attack good. This is what makes that evil.

@domsjuk I see. (Hi.... r) and Starmer are on the evilness to me. Both hate good people.

@@lovepeople951 This applies to literally every single moral system that is not outright and self-consciously psycopathic. If you ask an IS-fighter, why he slit a man's throat and enslaved his woman and child, he will tell you it's for the glory of God and the greater good - he is not evil, it's the ones whom he rightfully punishes who are evil. Likewise, a Nazi often enough did not think of themselves as evil; in their eyes, it is necessary to be violent to defend and purify your own race, which is entabgled in an inevitable war of races, and needs to protect itself from foreign and internal enemies. Most Evil comes in the disguise of the good, and will not recognize the myriad forms of Evil that have come before it, and just as itself denied its own nature.

Idk, I like it. It’s very postmodern. Juxtaposition of that with the old school aesthetic ends up typing both together as seeming equally hypermodern. (Note: not making fun, I sincerely like combinations like that)

I vote for the gamer chair to keep in there.

"Translate to English" Lmaooo

@@user-nu7xc4wp1h The rice, it’s very true.