Видео

Only if it is a big company. The smaller ones teaches you everything 😂 I was in a small business. Now in a bigger one. Do the same trust me.

Qwen was able to distinguish between specialties...front end, back end, then End to End Full stack. But typically, if you are back-end you would still be expected to be proficient in front end for integration (not the design)

@ thanks

hahhahaha...that is funny. Maybe avoiding tariffs

You need to answer this specific question....Is 2 years realistic for a senior developer? BIG NO. Most companies on AVERAGE do have similar ranges for junior, intermediate and senior developer. Would you pay a completely new developer after 2 years of hard work and boot camps then some coding a senior dev salary? It looks like DeepSeek did not have training on hiring or cv requirements. This answer is just not realistic. Subjective or variable....there are still some industry averages. But for such a hyped AI model.......

You're just doing an assumption that it takes how long to become a senior or a junior dev. Not everyone can be correct ​@@IncompleteDeveloper

@ Sure....You can always look at the REAL WORLD job market, what the majority of recruitment states as their requirements for intermediate and then Senior.

Very, Very good question. And this video is way too short to get into details. Let me assume you are completely new and have not done any programming before. This would be my path 1. Exactly as you have described. Start with HTML and CSS because they are STATIC (there is not programming logic involved, no flow of code or sequence) Always do most theory first then play around with building static HTML and CSS pages (no JavaScript) NB: Track the time it takes you to build just a simple static page...then the point will start to become clear: That REAL programming is going to be harder. 2. Once you have done a bit of static HTML pages...you will need to make a big decision: Choose a Framework Path (Assuming WEB Development) Options are ASP dot NET | Php (Laravel, CodeIgniter) | Ruby on Rails This is where the BACK-END programming starts, and you will need to know a full programming language Also, at this state you MIGHT need to know JavaScript as a start, then move on to JavaScript Frameworks (React.js, Angular ,Vue.js) It starts to get easy to get lost in the VERY LONG list of things to know to become a complete WEB-Developer. IT IS A LOT OF LEARNING...IT WILL TAKE A LOT OF TIME If there is a very specific video you would like me to make, you can inform me in the comments. I am more on the ASP.NET C#

NOPE. INCORRECT USE of ChatGPT decreases the code maintainability score. If used in a LAZY fashion where the developer does not give it detailed instructions. AI is very good at code generation. You should run your own experiments. Use some of the older code you have written, then prompt chatCPT to write something similar. Experiment A: Start by giving it pseudo code ....Experiment B: Give it ONLY high-level lazy instructions.

VERY Good Points. But you might be dumbing down the novelty. I this example, the AI would have seen this example many times before. Just like when people prompt AI to create Tetris or game of life. The good test always comes in on completely new specific requirements. I did another video where I gave ChatGPT very details instructions but in the form of pseudo code. In that use case, those instructions were NOT HIGH LEVEL. I had written tests before hand and IT still did a good job. When you say AI....there is also Claude Sonnet...which you can provide a lot more context. I think you can point it to your repository, give it high level sketches, so basically you can give it context (what Claude calls projects). And it does slightly better than ChatGPT. I am NOT sure if you have tried Claude Sonnet?? I am very impressed. Like I said, you are dumbing down what AI code generators are doing.

You are correct. But the point of NOT having magic strings is NOT a comparison check. The consumer/client of the magic string has to GUESS what that string is. More importantly there is no context or meaning of the magic string outside where it is initially defined.

Thank you mam. 🙂

Maybe management needs to use the ChatGTP prompt: "what other metrics besides line output?" Or maybe management will NEVER be replaced by AI, only developers :-(

@@IncompleteDeveloper Since management is the one making those decisions they will likely replace all but them when often they are the among if not even the most replaceable position from what I can see…

@@-----REDACTED----- True story. Maybe all human form should be replaced by AI. But not before NeuraLink can also code.

Ya...gotta pretend to be filling up the repository with some code...while actually watching videos using company internet

@ no no, I work from home! My internet their hardware!

@@smddev Still.....someone is ultimately getting billed...for code....AI code.

@@IncompleteDeveloper I mean some of the code is AI probably, but some things AI is literally incapable of doing to any meaningful way. I was joking though in the first place but you seem tense lol

@@smddev I know you were playing along. First line was "WET". Maybe I should have placed emojis in my comments. But anyways, really appreciate you giving the video a view and commenting. (still no emojis)

NOPE. Quality Assurance is a much broader topic which might involve a QA team i.e someone else who did NOT write the code. Some development teams/developers skip writing lower-level AUTOMATED tests (Unit/Integration) because they feel they can throw all the responsibility of testing to the QA team. So later QA and a developer writing AUTOMATED tests as she/he is coding are 2 different topics

What language are you using? I am assuming you are scraping a website to eventually have some structured data in a database (scappred data ends up in a number of db tables) The most basic tactic is to always think of a "CATEGORY" of task your given section of code is ultimately trying to achieve. Broadly there will be 2 things: 1 - PROCESSING/COMPUTING/Calculating on something (i.e a list, variables, data). 2 - Accessing some data (making a call to the website to be scraped via HttpClient or the older HttpWebRequest. Reading, Writing to the database) The trick is to separate these 2 high level goals BEFORE you code...even if you are NOT doing testing. Code for processing/computing will be in its own project (and if you test it will be ONLY unit tests, no mocking) Code for accessing data (api calls, httpClient, database access) will be in serparate projects (and if you tests it will be ONLY integration tests, again no mocking)

"I can't build without tests. It gave me grey hairs last time".... Not sure what you mean. Is there some Continuous integration requirement or test code coverage that needs to be passed before building? "I write code for a web scraper as well as a web app".... Is this the same system (web scraper with web app) or in general the type of code you create for different systems?

@IncompleteDeveloper python. Currently 2 systems. The scraper creates the data. App serves it and organises it to provide users with desired utility. It's called Troli (plus the SA web code)

@IncompleteDeveloper most tests people put in youtube videos are sooooo basic. I need a better strategy or mental framework for knowing what tests to write.

@@AAA-f1m Sure....I understand. I think some of the examples I have given are also basic. But I cannot help if you do not provide more details about what you are trying to achieve. I will assume you ALREADY have some basic grasp of testing in general. (I might sound too generic here as I am missing your problem details) The next hurdle/challenge will be to get the LARGE CODE BASE to be Testable. Not sure if you read my earlier replies to your original comment???