Видео

Thanks man!!

thank YOU!

thank you

Yes, first, somebody decided they could safely approach Kennedy's own Secret Service agents and ask them to murder their own President for them. Then, Agent Greer, knowing he was surrounded by witnesses and at least two people pointing cameras at him in broad daylight, decided to turn around into the faces of a carful of passengers inches from him and shoot Kennedy in the face. And then framed Oswald for it. That's brilliant.

🤣

Sorry but the earwitnesses all disagree with you. There were 3 shots. No more, no less. The witnesses on the 5th floor of the TSBD are the best witnesses, they were right under LHOs sniper nest. They even heard the bolt being operated and the ejected hulls hitting the floor. Most other witnesses also said 3 shots. No one said 5 or more shots.

@@Heroball299 Sorry, but you're operating under the false premise that that's the only spot where shots were fired or heard. Not true. A shot was heard by overpass eyewitness Sam Holland from the grassy knoll. Others heard shots from the short street before turning on Main Street. You are sadly misinformed. There were at least 4 to 5 shots, and no way the occipital blowout described by McClelland could possibly be a back shot. You need to not be so gullible and must read much more of the record than you have. You are an obvious Warren Commission apologist and nobody in possession of their faculties has a right to be. The evidence is too overwhelming of a conspiracy and coverup.

@Mikep487 You are sadly misinformed. No one shot from the knoll, Holland was mistaken. He never said he saw a shooter just some smoke. The autopsy confirms all shots came from behind the limo and there's really no way around it. McClelland is not a pathologist, he didn't even turn the president over. That's the whole reason they do autopsies, to determine cause of death because treating doctors are often wrong. You are just repeating conspiracy talking points from the 60's. We don't just rely on the Warren report any more to know what happened. There has been heaps of new evidence over the last 50 years and it all points to Oswald acting on his own. It's over. The crime has been solved.

@@Mikep487 You have any idea how confused and unreliable witnesses are? Most witnesses, however, in that echo chamber of a plaza said 3 shots. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots. Victims' reactions clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy's exit wound plainly seen exploding at the temple is consistent with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Witnesses just a few feet directly under the sixth floor window said the shots all came from directly overhead. Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and saw nobody there. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors in fact had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. The idea somebody desperate to frame this on a lone shooter was firing from multiple directions with different guns is obviously idiotic.

a) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. b) Most witnesses said there were but 3 shots. c) Windshield is still in the National Archives and its only damage is a bad crack caused by a bullet fragment that also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside. d) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each shot. e) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo from behind. f) Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. g) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and the only way it could do that is by exiting at Kennedy's throat. h) Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition consistent perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. i) That bullet was also matched to Oswald's rifle. j) Nobody planting a bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot. k) Kennedy's exit wound plainly seen exploding at the temple is consistent only with a shot from behind. l) Connally's said the shots all came from behind. m) Autopsy demonstrates the shots came from behind. n) Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos demonstrating the shots came from behind. o) It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume in a million years they would successfully frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions. But, have it your way: somebody desperate to frame this on Oswald from a window behind the limo did so by standing squarely in front of the limo, firing through glass, and past the ears of a carful of passengers as he shot Kennedy in the face with a different gun.

Nobody heard five shots You can even ask Clint Hill nobody

@@aaronz7056 You forgot to mention that the weight of all the bullet fragments that were removed from Connally's wrist and the fragments that weren't removed were more weight than the bullet was missing. I could dispute all of your so called "facts" but it would be a waste of my time because clearly you are clueless as to what really happened on 11/22/63.

@@mcgregordaniel1 Oh, B.S., buddy, don't insult my intelligence. Hilarious how you IMMEDIATELY announced an excuse for NOT having to address actual evidence, answer direct questions or deal with anything I might say to you in response, with the standard conspiracy theorist's routine of "I could dispute your evidence but I won't waste my time," then insult me and clam up... all like THAT settles the matter. You can set your watch by it. How about you just win me over, prove me wrong and prove a conspiracy? Or make the slightest attempt to offer up ANY plausible alternate scenario? Or are you just taking potshots at people dealing with evidence while simultaneously admitting you don't have a leg to stand on? lol Oh, and your story about Connally's wrist is crackpot B.S.

@@aaronz7056 You have zero intelligence to insult if you think that the fragments removed from Connally's wrist and the grain weight left in his wrist isn't actual evidence that the combined grain weight was more than was missing from the magic bullet. Here's some other evidence for you. LHO rifle hadn't been fired recently and had rust inside the barrel. I'll wait for your "magical" explanation on that FACT.

Yep, he's a total lonenutter like most of these journos. Ignorant, paid off by Mockingbird or brainwashed by the WC, Posner & Bugs.

Correct, he merely owned and smuggled the rifle, left his latent print on it, had every bullet and fragment ever found matched to it, lied to police about his whereabouts, immediately fled the plaza, shot a cop, was caught trying to shoot a second cop, refused to cooperate, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and rambled a hollow reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"

Of course not, he merely owned and smuggled the rifle, left his latent print on it, lied to police about his whereabouts, immediately fled the crime scene, shot a cop, was caught trying to shoot a second cop, refused to cooperate, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, never attempted to blow any conspiracy to anybody, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"

A mountain of credible evidence says otherwise.

​@@aaronz7056....not sure why you think that. I've never seen any hard evidence that Oswald was involved. In fact, the paraffin test on his face (that day) showed no evidence he fired a gun.

@@aaronz7056 A mountain of credible evidence says otherwise.

All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy's exit wound plainly seen exploding at the temple is consistent only with a shot from behind. Witnesses a few feet under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Nobody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions with different guns.

@@aaronz7056 Dude. Hit squads of that era commonly used military assault tactics, like diversion shots (esp blanks) and other loud noises and distractions to draw attention away from the primary shooter(s). Nobody is saying there weren't shots fired from the TSBD. What is clear is something happened behind the picket fence. Look at how the civilians present in that general location responded. GTFOH

@@playoption Yes, look how they reacted, all of them supposedly rushing unarmed to confront a crazed gunman. If fact Officer Haygood, as he firmly testified, ran up the knoll to secure the area, finding nothing and nobody. People saw him, assumed he must be chasing somebody, and this sparked a rush on onlookers following him. Behind the knoll fence, they are all filmed milling aimlessly around with nothing to see. Oh, and it's hilariously you ordered me to "GTFOH" after COMPLETELY FAILING TO SAY ONE WORD ACTUALLY ADDRESSING, MUCH LESS DISPROVING, ONE WORD OF EVIDENCE I LISTED. Dude.

You’re gonna believe an ear witness on the bus when the only bullets or fragments found all came from Oswald’s weapon.. I mean, you’re correct.. It’s evidence of a second gunman.. But it’s piss poor evidence that flies in the face of much better evidence.. But, you guys are experts in that, definitely.. Smh..

Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film alone clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each.

@@aaronz7056 No they don't. There were at least five or six shots and a back shot would not cause the right occipital blowout and it is clear the throat shot was an entry wound. There HAD to be at least three shooters to account for all the frontal and back shots.

@@Mikep487 B.S. I repeat: victims' reactions plainly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each. Most witnesses heard but 3 shots. Victims' reactions clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and the only way it could do that is by exiting at Kennedy's throat. Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. That bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle. In face, all bullets and fragments ever found were matched straight to Oswald's rifle. Nobody planting a bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot. Kennedy's massive exit wound clearly seen exploding at the temple is consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots all came from behind. Autopsy demonstrates the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos demonstrating the shots came from behind. Witnesses a few feet under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. It's blatantly idiotic to think anybody would ever assume in a million years they would successfully frame this on any lone shooter while firing from multiple, almost opposite directions. But, have it your way: somebody desperate to frame this on Oswald from a window behind the limo did so by standing in front of the car and shooting Kennedy in the face with a different gun. Happy, now?

He was there You weren't so you don't believe that somebody was there I'm believable the people today who think they know everything and they weren't there probably not even born yet This guy was there

San Antonio, the prior day maybe.

@@Jeff-bz6jp Yes, most likely.

@@Hawkgolf72 Come on man.. Why did he discard his jacket and then try to commit suicide by cop?.. Why is he connected to every location by physical evidence and multiple witnesses at each location?.. Why is the ZERO EVIDENCE anyone else was out there?.. lol..

@@Hawkgolf72 And it’s Tippit, ok?..

Tippit's body had bullets from two guns, consistent with eyewitness accounts that saw two shooters - possibly Ruby and Crawford. Oswald could not have been there because the time of his bus ticket and theatre ticket did not coincide with the time Tippit was killed. Tippit was a frame job. Tippit was acting erratic and was not supposed to be at that location. Perhaps Tippit was tasked to kill Oswald. Oswald's gun did not match the bullets and was jammed anyway and could not shoot, as evidenced by the account of his capture. Police allegedly found Oswald's wallet at the Tippit murder scene, but that was part of the frame job. Oswald had his wallet with him when arrested at the theatre. Besides, what sense does it make to murder a cop for no apparent reason, and then drop your wallet at the murder scene. Oswald claimed he was a patsy and did not shoot anyone.

@@PaulHenreid There was not evidence of 2 guns.. There was 2 different types of ammo used.. The shells recovered were 2 different types of ammo, all 38 loads and ALL FIRED through Oswald’s weapon.. 1 dude, 1 pistol, 2 types of ammo.. And that dude had both types of ammo loaded into that pistol when he was arrested.. Sorry, Charlie..

@@PaulHenreid And if you believe the answer to the odd coincidence of both Lee and the killer discarding jackets is a double Oswald?.. Then you’re a fool.. lol.. The answer is Lee and the killer were the same guy, and only one jacket was actually discarded.. This is why fibers found on that jacket match the shirt Oswald was arrested in.. It’s also why those shells are there, 10 people IDed him and he tried to commit suicide by cop when the jig was up.. It’s a slam dunk case..

This gentleman did NOT say it was a Greyhound bus. He said it was a Greyhound-TYPE bus.

@@MariaLuvsElvis so? Why not say it was a CONTINENTAL BUS? He was there ,right? Did he see the shooter(s)? Stating HIS facts like it was the truth. There were people who actually saw smoke and witnesses everywhere that gave the same testimony, but he was in a bus that was behind the lead cars. The LHO narrative is the most disturbing. Most of the witnesses were mysteriously killed. But if you want to argue , then go ahead. There's plenty to argue about.

James files is a lying fraud. He wants the notoriety of the grassy knoll, but he didn’t fire the fatal shot.

James files is a lying fraud. He wants the notoriety of the grassy knoll, but he didn’t fire the fatal shot.

Yeah and he lied embarrassingly. He was in jail at the time. When the TV show supposed to interview asked him about he said it was his twin brother. They cancelled the interview. Oswald shot Kennedy on his own.

You mean the James There Are No Files? The 17 yr old small weapons specialist that the military " kept around" because of his ' knowledge'? The 82nd Airborne guy that paratrooped into thick, lush canopies in Viet Nam?🤣 There are no military files on this guy, nor on Sutton either. This No Files guy also claimed Oswald picked him up on Thursday ( LHO was at work) and drove him around Dallas all day in a pickup truck. LHO didnt have a drivers license, didnt drive at all, nor did he own a vehicle, hence, that's why he road to work with Frazier. Mr. No Files also claimed one of the mafia guys was sick with a cold, and he was asked would he fill in? So, he says SURE! And then got him a good night's sleep! (Who says that? ) The same No Files was investigated by not only the FBI, but also a private investigator hired by Dick Clark Productions, because they were going to do a show on him. They kept their money. Mr. No Files was found to have been in Chicago on 11-22-63, in which his wife was hospitalized during that week. He said no, that was my twin brother with her, that no one knew about, but I killed him after 11-22-63 😮( how convenient). When the wife was questioned, she said he didnt have a twin brother. The No Files that said he bit 2 shell casings and buried them behind the fence at Dealey Plaza. Who takes the time to fire, then search for casings, dig holes deep enough not to wash away from 1963 to 1995? These casings were found, however, they were manufactured in 1972. 😂 Nine years after the assassination. The picture he claimed LHO took of him in the Mesquite hotel room......how many motel rooms had stereos, complete with turntable in the rooms? There is one behind him. Why was he shirtless, with a grease rag hanging out his back pocket? Why would LHO even take a dang picture of him? Who is STILL in prison, and blabs out he killed the most important man in the world? Was he not worried about more jail time? No, because he knows its all a lie! Had he been arrested AGAIN, after getting out of prison for shooting at a cop, his tune wouldve changed big time, and all those foolish people wouldnt have bought his books. He is not selling many books these days, though still promoting them from Ruby Tuesday's. Anyway, he's into painting pictures now. Gee, that sounds so familiar. And things like that. ( his fav byline)

Okay: Files claimed he was palling around with Oswald in New Orleans in 1961. Oswald was in Minsk in 1961. Files claimed he was present at a Dallas meeting the morning of the assassination where it was discussed how the parade route had been changed. The parade route was never changed, accurately described by the newspapers from the beginning. Files claimed he was a knoll assassin. Phone records demonstrate Files was in Chicago during the assassination and when confronted with this he tried to claim he was being confused with his own nonexistent twin brother. NBC cancelled their planned TV show on this lying clown after taking a closer look at him.

You don’t know him from Adam and your calling him a liar? AH

@@JMC786 I know he is repeating the same old lies. 🤥

@@panchovilla7235And your proof is …?

@@JMC786 paraffin test proved Oswald did not shoot a gun that day.

@@panchovilla7235 The paraffin test was deemed unreliable, so unreliable that the FBI stopped relying on it in 1965. Oswald shot Tippett, four people ID him, the pistol he was caught w/ in the Texas theater was proven to be the weapon that killed him. And paraffin test was negative, then positive, proving how unreliable. BTW, Oswald tried to shoot the arresting detective when confronted but luckily the cop had his hand in front of the hammer. All the evidence points to one man, Oswald!! Trying doing a little more research, I’ve been studying this case for 60 yrs, case closed years ago but people like you cherry-pick quotes from morons like Groden and Oliver Stone

This “know it all “ is either a psychic or a private investigator, haha!