Видео

Biodegradability was not discussed which I hope can be better than foam used for the food industry for that version of this product. CFC and other chemicals used for production is another concern that must be better than petrochemical based foam. Most importantly, greenhouse gas emissions during production must be better than legacy products and ideally negative by sequestering the wood carbon.

Right now I'm wearing a shirt made from bamboo cellulose, called 'viscose' .

Is it possible to also make simple insulating foam for spacecraft?

Great work!

what happens if one breaths NP?

@4:32 Aaand there it goes wrong... If you just calculate the mass above the ground you get this kind of view. But a clear cut affects on ground storage too. So clear cut CREATES emissions due to carbon release from the ground. It is extremely vital to add what happens in the ground to get real sinks and emissions. Roots, and fungus that works with trees, take lots of carbon in them. And if you have excess carbon in the air the ground behavior changes and it starts to release more carbon. At first you may see more nutrients taken to boost the growth and then carbon cycle is altered. And with clear cut and if done even worse the soil is turned, the carbon is released from ground sinks too. and even more carbon can be adde with fossil fuel made fertilizers that are often added to boost the growth... @5:50 Methane plays minor role, because the water table is not affected. If CO2 cycle goes under water it releases more methane (roughly 50% more due to chemistry change, C2+2O2 = 2 CO2, but C2+2H2O = CH4 + CO2, but this is over simplified version). @8:50 Weird dense regenerated forests. Why not use similar forests where just some trees are taken within 30 year period and every tree on rotation is taken in 120 years? 4 Harvests in a long period of the time. With this model you keep 90+ years old trees in the mix and only 120 years old ones are taken (except making space for trees to grow). And of course regeneration won't work if the forest is not forest but just too dense shrubs. Taken study model does not make sense. Seems like another study made by forest companies that does not want any changes on their clear cut methods.

I would like try use Saphonine

They still cut large areas of ancient forest and ruin them for a quick profit

can it be foamed?

Hallo

its better if they try using the date palm tree branches or fronds as a row material for that it has lots of long visible stands of fibers in it it could be better than cutting down trees, also for any wood making palm tree branches or leaves or fronds can be used as a wood substitute without needing to cut a tree down, if you try to tell this suggestion to not only these researchers but to most researchers researching the topic of making things from wood or from cellulose or from lignin, it might be helpful for them and for the environment and to preserve forests.

how can u get that powdered lignin? extracted from biomass?

if it is hydrophobic how it's shown in the video it's getting dissolved in water

We're getting closer to having a real Spider-Man

Thanks for sharing the video.

Awesome. Do you do select logging or use clear cutting methods? Can certain old growth and mixed forests be left standing to support biodiversity? Here in Canada the mixed boreal forests are raped and replaced with sprayed mono softwood plantations that are again harvested in 50 years. Floods, draughts, fires, biodiversity gone....silence

Olkaa niin ystävällisiä ja välttäkää tekstitysten polttamista itse videostriimiin. Kiitos.

The Earth is cooler with the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. ruclips.net/video/0Jijw7-YG-U/видео.html The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG warming, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming. Version 1.0 062122