Видео

Very good explanation. Only comment is you cannot use x as the area marker and the horizontal axis as x at the same time. That makes your f(x)dx nonsensical. Thanks all the same.

0:22 the J stands for Jay.

"I would do it on a piece of paper", "These ticks are just for me". Same :D

Good little exercise. Personally I would have put the origin of the axes at the position of the catapult and replaced 31m with 27.5m.

very good, and clear

Thanks a lot ❤

questions 9 could you write more step , please

What a great explanation! That was so great! Thanks! Btw why were you pronouncing "Haitch" lol

Thanks bro this helped alot

I needed to use some properties of Bessel functions but unfortunately wasn't able to find it in this book. I had to write an amplitude modulated complex exponential as a bessel function. Besides that the book looks good

Nice content just wodering why your views are low

How can I get it for free

Only channel which explain the derivation

Are you crazy? This is the best darn derivation I've seen

I think it will be 42

Thank you for these videos! Super interesting and fun! I enjoyed the differential eq. question, even if I took the long way solving the p.e. instead of just looking at the graph... oh well! And I realize I need to refresh my statistics knowledge base! xD

holy shit you blew my mind im starring this video in case i forget

👍

You hurt my brain😂

B

B

The password is the first 8 digits of Pi.

bro this is amazing

Beautiful explanation

Neat, precise and profound. Thank you so much ❤️❤️❤️

❤

This is amazing, bro. Thank you soooo much. Your simple but elegant explanation makes me understand the relationship between integration and area under graph (In school, our teacher only taught that's how integration works without any explanation XD)

You often say general relativity, but the book talks about special relativity and Electrodynamics

Please do more physics and math textbook review ❤❤❤

That is a 5th grade question, there is no way that’s tripping anyone up on SAT

75

It Must be Two, you have 2 variables x and y .. each has an Solution

Hold up let him cook

write it in matrix form, check determinant

No need to multiply both denominators and you didn't fully simplify your final answer. Multiply top and bottom by 2 on the first fraction to get a common denominator of 4. You then have (2x-8)/4 + (2x+5)/4 = 6. This equals (4x-3)/4 = 6 -> 4x-3 = 24 -> x = 27/4.

What was the question? Find x or find the right answer? What is None? x=None or "None of the above is correct"

L is actually half the period, my formula is slightly wrong :(

6+3-9=0

7x2 = 14 7x2 = 14 14 + 14 = 28 Or just 7+7=14 14×2=28 First time i did the first option. They are the same but the second its just better.

Not me knowing it is 9 bc i tried all answers and only 9 worked.

That was smart. Nice vid

I think this depends on if it’s implied there are parentheses because if there are then this would be 4^720 but if it isn’t implied then you are correct and it is 4.

What?

C

Use √❌ Use ^½❌ Use ^(1/2)✅

Bro this cant be sat question this is literally 7th grade

b

I don't know why in math learning videos, you start concentrating extremely when you don't know where something rised from

Here before some indian bloats about how hard the jee is and how they could do this before they were even born 🧠

42