Видео

11:50 20:15 22:20 ...a person who is always fearful 27:30 CONFIDENT IN YOUR WORK 1:51:53 2:01:00 dreamers

Wow, thank you for this because I always listen to a 45 video on this at least once a month but it looks like you have expanded it and you're going to use stocism to help break it down

Teaching THIS on my Channel ‼️‼️‼️

You helped humanity by posting this. Godspeed

Thanks for posting

🔥🔥🔥

Thank you for the reminder of life is beautiful, even when it's hard to see sometimes

You are Unique and powerful. You are enough. You are all you need to be great 👍😃

It's really a hard thing to do, but I pray that God will help us. Thanks

Regarding the James Ossuary: James, Joseph, and Jesus were all common names. There is nothing tying this stone to Jesus of Nazareth, nor would it be evidence of Jesus divinity of his resurrection. STILL waiting for that evidence.....

The Pilate stone is evidence of Pilate, not Jesus. STILL waiting for that evidence.....

No neither Tacitus, nor Josephus, nor any of the other Roman writers authenticate the stories about Jesus. They only document what Christians believed, not whether or not those beliefs were true. STILL waiting for that evidence.....

As always, they claim to have evidence. As always, they don't provide any evidence. <yawn>

Not sure if you're new to these concepts or not, but these arguments have all been demonstrated to fail, for many different reasons. To post this video unironically and without naivete, one could only conclude this is posted out of deceit and malice.

An interesting video, but it contains a number of flaws in the arguments.. The Cosmological Argument, asserting that "Everything that begins to exist has a cause," relies on metaphysical rather than empirical grounds. While causality is a cornerstone of classical physics, quantum mechanics challenges its universality, presenting phenomena without classical causes. Moreover, the leap to a metaphysical first cause for the universe's origins, as suggested by theories like the Big Bang, lacks empirical support, making this argument speculative and divergent from scientific methodologies. The Teleological Argument equates the universe's complexity with intentional design, akin to human-made objects. However, this overlooks the natural, undirected processes like evolution that account for complexity over time. The analogy misses the iterative nature of evolution, where "failures" are naturally selected out, thus misrepresenting how complexity emerges naturally without a designer. The Moral Argument claims objective moral values and duties indicate a divine lawgiver, ignoring the evolution of moral frameworks alongside human societies for social cohesion and cooperation. The variability of moral norms across cultures and times challenges the notion of objective morality, suggesting instead that morality evolves to meet societal needs, negating the need for a divine origin.

Strive Thou shall rob thy neighbour neighborhood since ............ Stealing ever for ......... Stealing books diaries and anything and everything Including locks ???

*Promo sm*