Видео

@blessbyyou777 thank you for your support of my channel!

@@THELEMISIS you always welcome✨

Glad you enjoyed it!

Thank you for your thoughtful comment. I really appreciate it. I can tell you actually listened to more than 3 minutes of the video.

Agreed!!

Thanks for listening! I appreciate you! Great minds! :)

Hahaha so true!

say they don't want a meta, but AMR just shits on how good the railgun was vs bots. Only thing railgun had over it pre nerf was piercing turrets/tanks from the front/sides.

I’m glad I was able to help in anyway so that you can avoid a headache. Thanks for listening and sharing!

Agreed! Well said!

Agreed! Thanks for listening!!

Thanks for listening and thank you for the sub. I appreciate you!

Thanks for listening!

Hahah agreed!

Thanks for listening

Thank for listening

Thanks for listening and commenting and I fully respect your opinion.

It because the armor value isn't counted on your helmet. So you can get 2-4 shotted if a enemies hit you on the head regardless of what armor you wear.

Thanks for the listen, I appreciate you.

LOL I just stopped playing those games for the most part. But, I agree.

I agree with the sentiment and I wish I had more to say, but thank you for listening.

Souls are famous for being difficult but fair. You can learn them. This is unfair difficulty which breaks a golden rule

🎯💯

That sounds fucking boring

I stopped playing COD a long time ago. I'm afraid to see where it is right now currently.

Your toxic behavior truly isn't worth responding to. But, I will anyway to give you some hope. This kind of stupid comment makes me concerned for the state of the world. Or, maybe you're just trolling I'm delusional? I'm doing what I'm supposed to do as a paying consumer, giving feedback on a game that Arrowhead specifically asked me to provide as a fan of the game. While all you do is comment on other RUclipsrs without making any truly worthwhile content. How about you get back online and bring forth Democracy to the crappy version of HD2 that you are so good with playing right now.

I respect your kindness and comment. It's ok for us to disagree. Thanks for listening!

Why do you feel like you need to tell me how to play the game? Why are you telling me what is boring to you or others? You don't know each person's personal preferences or what I consider to be fun or boring. The problem with people at Arrowhead or commenters like you is that you feel that you have the liberty to tell me and other gamers what to do, how to play, or enjoy the game. It's like a dictatorship saying "You'll play the game I produce, and you'll like it." Keep that same energy as you drink the fluoride in the water and they keep you under their control. This may sound like an exaggeration, but it isn't. It starts off small and simple, but there's little difference between this and how the American government treats people. So, you're welcome because my channel and my words fight for the people. Your comments don't help the cause.

Agreed. LOL Dog Poo.

"Hi I'm BoxFloat. I have more fun playing this way. Why don't you have fun playing this way? Why don't you like playing like me? Why don't you like the same music as me? If everyone in the world thought like me, the world would be a better place." Yet again, I'm here as a thoughtful consumer, using my rights to share my individual opinion, that Arrowhead requested I share, in order to make a better game. But, somehow gamers and commenters feel the need to suppress my sharing of my opinion. Sounds kind of like a dictator trying to control the masses? What's next? We exile all the of the outcasts to the Island of Patmos for disagreeing with the king? Get a clue and read the Bible, LOL.

@@THELEMISIS”Get a clue and read a Bible” I’m done 😂😂😂😂😂

Why would anyone CARE about the game when they can come on the internet can complain about it?

And I think you may have a very short attention span and probably listened to less than 3 minutes of the video and went straight to the comments. And don't lie to me, I see the numbers. Why don't you go online and blindly fight for democracy instead of talking to true Helldivers who are here making a difference before going to the battlefield unequipped? Maybe you've had too much acid in the brain from all of the Terminids spewing around you.

Grammar Issue. You forgot the period to your statement. We were taught punctuation in grammar school. Maybe you missed that day? And don't try to edit. I'll see it. LOL

My main recommendations for a better patch would be for the Rail Gun to increase the time to charge the weapon and increase the time to reload the weapon. And for the energy shield, they could have just allowed for the shield to be damaged if you were attacked in battle without impacting the cooldown. And clearly, they needed to increase the viability of all of the primary and secondary weapons in the game. Overall, I agree with the sentiment of your opinion.

@@THELEMISIS hell, even if you had to use unsafe mode to get full damage but safe mode dealt like 75% of the OG damage it'd be fine. Have the bonus damage scaling past unsafe mode limits raise faster so at like 80% or so 2 taps charger legs and keeps the fantasy of a railgun in tact (piercing armor) Shield longer cooldowns is fine, but having it take a whole ass minute to regen if it's only half depleted is absurd. Some of the primaries really do need help though. The liberator and AP liberator as well as the SMGs. The dominator as well. Only good weapons right now are the shotguns and scorcher

Preach it brother, I wholeheartedly agree.

I was so down with reading your comment, but then I realized within the first sentence that this is a comment of an ignorant person. So, allow me to educate you and improve your life: After 5 minutes, becomes 5 minutes and 1 second. Keep on listening from that minute on and your mind will opened and completely blown. School teaches reading AND comprehension. Go ahead and feel free to comprehend, since you've gotten the reading portion out of the way.

It's refreshing to hear such a sound and logical mind. I wish I had 10 more commenters like you. Thumbs up, soldier! I feel just as duped as you do. Hopefully my video response and recommendations and many others like this will be shared with Arrowhead to bring freedom, true balance, fun, and democracy back to the game.

Worth noting the spawns have been acknowledged to be messed up right now by the devs and are going to be patched... rn they're just focusing on fixing the server issues caused by the introduction of mechs

@@THELEMISIS I have some hope that things aren't taking a turn for the worse permanently, but you know the saying: expect nothing so you can avoid disappointment but enjoy any surprises that come. My usual group and I have gotten slightly better at the game by changing up our tactics/playstyles, but I still can't ignore the fact that it was necessary to do so. What I find really ironic is that their primary reason for nerfing items was to "remove metas," but in doing so they created new metas already that require people to play a certain way. This problem could've been avoided if they just didn't shift the goal posts on the game's vision entirely AFTER people paid money for it. I suppose it is a nuanced decision, which can make the argument against the latest update(s) difficult to encapsulate, but even if in theory we all WERE okay with the changes, announced and unannounced (some of the changes were shadow changes, not mentioned in the notes), there's still an overarching theme of dishonesty and lack of communication. Those sorts of things are massive red flags to me at least. I'll also briefly mention that in Canada at least (where I live), they've hiked up the prices of super credits in the store slightly. I've mentioned this to some people and I seem to be the only one who's noticed it? It might just be to match a new market value sure, but making changes to a real currency shop also isn't a great sign. Am I paranoid or unreasonable in thinking they're price hiking for future endeavors in money scalping? The first major update to the game wasn't given to us clearly and was designed to be more frustrating to casual players, the devs are disrespectful, unapologetic, and unthoughtful to their fans, the shop currency just got a price hike up. I think we both know that these are all bad signals. My personal conclusion? They're building an environment where they can sell us stuff to make our game more enjoyable. And hey, maybe I'm just a schizo and I'm wrong. I sure hope I am.

I agree. I was never a part of the community that would kick players because they didn't have certain load outs. I find that ridiculous I grinded to get to level 20 just recently just to get the rail gun and bubble shield. And then I played for less than a week with the rail gun and bubble shield, and then it was nerfed. Super Lame.

I hope your comment isn't a reflection of your grammar skills. I know you can do better than that.

LOL, My Man. I think we'd make good friends - preach it, brother. Hope to see you in battle! .....IF they revert these changes.

I'm glad you're still having fun, LOL. Enjoy your next dive, soldier!

What's truly insane is that you feel the need to tell people what to do and how to feel. I'm here to provide feedback to Arrowhead about my gameplay experience, just as they requested. Why don't you follow suit and do the same?

Honestly I don't find your comment all that funny, so I'm not sure where the joke is. I wouldn't do open mic nights in your area because your stand up content would be so brutal to listen to. How about you listen to more than 5 minutes of my video to better inform you for the next time you comment?

Get back on the field, soldier! And stay out of these comments! I'm a helldiver on a mission - trying to help bring you better weapons for the battlefield! For democracy!

Why do people care about the preferences of others? You and I have the right to be annoyed about what annoys us and express it safely through forums like RUclips. What I find intriguing is the motivation of others who disagree with the sentiment that the game should not be nerfed. If the so called unskilled player joins your party with their unskilled over powered weapon they are only impacting their experience in that particular way and making the squad's experience better by killing certain enemies on the battle field with ease. Which gains everyone on the team samples, requisitions, etc. and they are doing it within the means of the game that was established by the developers themselves upon releasing the game. Lastly if you and or others find that boring you could just leave the party and start your own solo mission or group with friends. Why do we feel the need to try and control others and lambast others in a PvE game? I know your comment did not warrant this long drawn out response but you seem to be reasonable so I decided to bridge the gap in a discussion.

@@THELEMISIS Elitism makes players who weren't using the nerfed stuff feel better than the rest and for some reason they have to show it through taunts and down playing your gripe but the moment their playstyle is effected they will be right along with you.

So what's the logical explanation for these nerfs to come before the promised patch drop?

Because its pathetic thay you "cant enjoy the game" just because you cant be overpowered. There is a plethora of other options all you whiners are ignoring. You refuse to adapt. I dont wanna say "git gud" but honestly id you cant adapt to not having broken gear jusy play on easy. People weren't using these items because they were the most fun. Its because they were the most effective. I think the game should change. People are gonna get tired of the game if they are pidgeonholed into using the same 5 items ​@chrisharley5781

@@sparkyspinz9897 Don't you think it's more pathetic that you feel the need to tell people how to enjoy their lives and the games that they play? Why are you wasting time in the comments? Go on back to that game that you love and leave the critical thinking to the adults in the room.

You have the right to your opinion and that's simply what it is... Just your opinion. You don't have the right to control how others choose to play their games. So your opinion is irrelevant in my opinion because the way I play my game does not impact the way you play your game. If you happen to be in a game partied up with me you can simply just leave the party and block me. It's a PvE game. I think players like yourself try to impose dominance on others to gratify themselves with how superior they think they are in all facets but you're not better. They are not better. You all just have a different opinion. Marketing the game as a live service game does not justify any changes. Arrowhead also stated that they would listen to the community and potentially revert unwarranted changes. That's in my rights and your rights as the consumer so I don't see an error on my part but your motivation is questionable. I'm sure you clearly are not satisfied with the state of the gaming industry as a whole if you represent the typical gamer. I think you're simply trying to defend any sign of sacred ground a gamer has when a developer like Arrowhead comes out with a game that shows any signs of promise. If I am right that is where the mistake is made. It's a simple tactic in business to take away more than enough and provide just a little in return and then you will praise me with the little provided because I have robbed you of everything you have but can keep the couch and the silverware. Also, I am very confident you didn't listen to my entire video so it explains why your comment is baseless and irrelevant. You have the right to be wrong but if I were to agree with you we would both be wrong.

You definitely do have a right to control how people play. It's called being a developer. The player plays within the constraints. ​@@THELEMISIS

@@THELEMISIS Are pve games somehow exempt from nerfs and buffs? Just cause it's pve doesn't mean things can't be changed up. It's more wild you're ranting this hard about a nerf that is barely a nerf.

Thanks for the no hate. I appreciate that very much. I don't believe I am misinterpreting anything. This is a live service game that promises nerfs and buffs and they also promise that they will hear the community when a nerf or buff that is unwarranted so I am exercising my rights as a consumer to inform Arrowhead that I believe they are heading in the wrong direction behind the spirit of the update. As I stated in the video the nerfs were not that game breaking but it points to a philosophy that I believe will spread through out the life of this game leading to its demise if they continue down this path. If they can nerf the meta than they will continue to nerf anything they choose which only provides you with a less than great experience. I am not in the business of playing video games the way other people think. This kind of control is laughable. I play games to do things that are outlandish on my own terms and my own way. Arrowhead is trying to control the way we play for one major reason and that's simply to try and keep future players from progressing too far into the game before they can release the next update so we keep playing their game longer and spend more money. Its not my fault you promised a live service game that you are unable to update regularly with content before the existing content gets too old. So lets be honest and look at the real reason these change were made. Arrowhead is a studio trying to make money. Why not release a game with new content already completed? Also why release the game knowing the disparity between weapons' they designed in the game? Do they play their game? No player should be penalized for a mistake they made. They released the shield generator, railgun, and breaker as is. These kinds of changes should never happen and again its minor but it can lead to future decisions that come from this philosophy of decision making which I believe will be the end of Helldivers 2 sooner than later if they keep down this track. Remember the gaming community on this game is divided which means they can potentially lose half or more than half of the players currently playing this game. Lets see where the dust settles and honestly do you think you could actually change the minds of others with such a subjective polarizing topic?

@@THELEMISIS Your entire argument is based upon the premise that nerfs are bad and will lead to the downfall of the game later on, you said it yourself. Yet your argument has little ground to stand on as it is in and of itself a slippery slope. You assume that just because the devs can change a couple minor details, they can wipe essentially our entire progress. You seem to forget how absolutely outraged the community would be at this. If they wiped chunks of the player base’s progress there would be so much backlash and protest that the game would become irrelevant. And if Arrowhead wants to make more money they would NEVER take as drastic steps as those. However I can see one of your points: Arrowhead will most likely slow our progression of the game to release more updates. But why wouldn’t they? It’s a live service game, and not just a conventional one. The game is essentially over as soon as we liberate each and every single planet, and if we start accomplishing this too fast, then that means there is no more reason to play, and Arrowhead wants us to keep playing because that’s how they make money. So yes and no, they won’t ever take away our progress, but they may slow it to build the kind of story they want developed. Also the in testing, they may not have noticed exactly how powerful the railgun, breaker, and shieldpack were. And so if they see squads just cheezing the game with said items, they are going to nerf them because they want not only all the weapons they poured hard work into making being used, but also their game to be reasonably difficult on its HIGHEST DIFFICULTY.

Wholeheartedly agree with everything you stated. I could not have said that any better.

You guys act like they nerfed the gun into oblivion, literally all you need to do is be in unsafe mode and charge it a bit longer. It's not that bad, stop it.

Thanks for listening. Thanks for sharing your opinion. I'm glad you have a way to enjoy how you play HD2 but you don't have any say on how others choose to play that very same game. Everything you stated is just your opinion and your experience but it doesn't make anyone else's experience incorrect or wrong. Again I said this in previous comments. I find it interesting that other people care so much about the preferences of others and their playing style in a PvE game. What's your motivation for trying to tell other people how they should play a game? Marketing the game as a live service game does not justify any changes they make. They also stated that they would listen to the community and potentially revert unwarranted changes. That's in my rights and your rights as the consumer so I don't see an error on my part but your motivation and the motivation of others is questionable.

@@THELEMISIS bro it's not even a fucking nerf, you just have to be in unsafe mode, literally that's it. Are you too scared to use the thing not in safe mode?

@@MrStone125They nerfed it across the board. Even near max charge it does a lot less damage and armor chipping. Before unlocking the slug shotgun, it was what I used to kill devastators as anything else was just to slow due to the wonky hitbox of their head. Just because they didnt mention it in the patch notes doesnt mean it didnt change. But the punisher and its slug version got buffs. Enemy AI got buffs. post game screen got sped up. etc.

Well said! Thank you!

Exactly my thoughts, always thought it was supposed to be a fun cooperative game now that enjoyment is not what it used to be to be

They have 9 mode play on easier lvls simple as that really

Bravo! I agree and unfortunately our words will probably fall on deaf ears because apparently we suck. We need to get good. lol

@@THELEMISIS Most probably, yes. There's almost no getting around the 'get good' elitism in some players. Not in everyone, of course. But the ones who leave a lobby as soon as someone brings a loadout they think makes it too easy.

@@Planesrifter the "get gud" elitism will be what causes the schism in the community more that anything it was fun when we were all on the same page, once you start downing my mood as a member i don't feel as enthused and motivated toward our common goal. Now I'll wait until something pulls my attention back.

@@Planesrifter It's not like you have to play on the hardest difficulty. The devs have clearly stated that they want variety over straight power progression. Their goal is clearly to have as many weapons and stratagems be viable as possible. That's of course really hard to achieve, especially since there will always be people really diving into the meta and finding what works best. But the fact that they are striving to balance it this way is really appealing to a lot of players. This is what the quote on their website means by the way. "A game for everyone is a game for no one." They're not trying to appeal to everyone, they are taking the game in a specific direction, and some people love that, and some people don't. If you do not like it, that's okay. It just wasn't your type of game, you didn't even buy it yourself so no harm done. But just because it doesn't appeal to you specifically, that doesn't mean you have to belittle those who do like it, and try to influence the developers to abandon their target audience, and make the game appeal to you instead. Also, you say that there are people who leave a lobby because someone brings a loadout they think makes it too easy, but I'd say it's far more common that people leave because someone brings a loadout that's not meta. And I think struggling to find people to play with because you want to play with the weapons you find fun instead of what is meta, is way worse for the game.

@@ywkbme From reading your comment, you're basically saying he doesn't have the right to his opinion when he is just as qualified as you are to his own opinion of the game. Whether it was gifted to him or not, he still owns the game. Arrowhead specifically stated that they want all feedback from everyone who owns their game. Just because you agree with the recent change doesn't mean the change was correct. I purchased the game, I am the target audience, and I also agree with him, even though he didn't purchase the game himself. The mindset you bring to the table is of the mind of a person trying to control and dictate individuals to conform, not of a democracy that allows input from all individuals who are a part of that government system, or in this case a gaming community.

Well said! Thank you!

The devs have already promised a nerf to heavy armored enemies and spawn rates, so clearly their patch didn't bring things in-line with their vision.

@PROJ3CTW4RRIOR You seem very toxic, and the idea that you feel the need to tell me what to like, what to do, and how to play the game is laughable. No matter how well-spoken you are, you sound ignorant. Since the dawn of time? Adam and Eve were just eating fruits in the garden, bro. LOL. Clearly, you didn't listen to any of the video. Maybe you should take the Q-tips out of your ears. I made this very clear in the first five minutes, so I'm a little concerned for you and wonder where your attention span is. Let me break this down for you: In the game, your characters can increase in levels. There are war bonds that you can unlock with medals as you progress in the game. The progress we make has to do with things we have unlocked in the game such as: primary weapons, support weapons, upgrades, and other strategems. If they alter anything we have upgraded or unlocked negatively in the game, that is the very definition of wiping away the progress that you've made in the game. And, if you listen to my video again, I stated that I have an issue with the philosophy of nerfing things in the game because you are communicating to the player base that nothing is safe from being changed and at any moment any progress we've made toward a particular item is rendered useless with a nerf. There are no incentives to grind for anything in this game.

@@DigoryJames Exactly.

​@@THELEMISIS these people seem to forget the dumb new enemy spawns, wheres the skill when a bile titan spawns on your evac.

so if the game losses 20 percent of its base the nerfs are good cope

Thanks for listening. Thanks for sharing your opinion but that's simply what it is... Just an opinion. Clearly there are so many things that can be said here to counter the points you've made. Why not make all guns viable in the game? Why just one gun to rule them all? If your aim is for efficiency than you can make a slew of weapons that are equally efficient and leave it up to the player base to pick what they like but that's not what happened. 90 percent of the primary and support guns in the game are useless in higher difficulties so it would make more sense to buff all the guns. Why did they not consider decreasing the reload speed of the rail gun? They could have also adjusted the gun to take longer to charge up? Lets be real the change was made to simply control the way gamers play the game. This game does not have much substance. Its a one and done game but they want to slow our progress down. They want us to play their game longer and spend more money but its not my fault you released a game that people are beating too fast. Why not release a game that is not broken? Why not release a game with updated content ready to roll out? I definitely do not agree with harassing anyone but we all have the right to inform Arrowhead respectively when a change is unwarranted and should be reverted. And we have the right to tell them when we disagree with their decisions. We can inform them through forums etc. or simply stop playing their game. Which if they keep this up many will do that very same thing. Than those who stick around will simply be stuck with a dying game. I've seen this happen way too many times. We shall see.

If they only lose 20% but I've seen polls where 60 percent of the player base was playing on higher difficulties and those are mainly the players complaining about the recent changes. So what happens if half the player base drops off? That's not good and it shows very poor business practices. We shall see if they continue down this path.