Видео

Glad it helped!

Any time!

Glad I could help

Lile and sub for more. ! 😀

did you try to right click the object in the slicer and select FIX? sometimes it helps as it takes the object down to the wireframe, then regenerates the outside object walls. Glad you figured it out, and thanks for sharing your solution in the comment field <3

if you download the wrong file it has no virus or anything. many other downloaded the correct files and had no viruses.

Glad it helped. Please like and sub for more.

We've all been there! :D

Thank you sir!

Don't see a link?

Literately the same as I did. Now the video outline constraining dots in 2D space sketches. I have never done this with 3D sketch activated, so don't know how that would work. I try to sketch as much as possible in 2D , but have also made a video about how to create closed shapes in 3D sketches with points which i advise to check out. If you design a sketch element which should contain many sketch elements, then i highly advise to start off with a 2-point constraint like TOP and LEFT or RIGHT, then make references to these values with TEXT objects to easily see them. Then you simply draw the rest of the sketch-elements from that constrained point, and you only change those to values and since everything is constrained it will move without distorting things. Thanks for watching, and hit that like button and sub for more. :D

I find it happening again and again as well. To permanently fix this, you'd need a brand new handle, and properly fasten it. To me it seems the handle wither is supposed to have something on the INSIDE hooking into it, or it is just worn down, and jumps out of it's slot on the inside. I am thinking of finding a spare part assembly from a wrecked car and changing the whole ting. Which would require disassembly of the inside of the door as this one has an electric lock.

Thanks for pointing it out. the middle and back one are 140 and the front one is 120mm since it otherwise would come to high on the memory modules.

I found raft layer to be great if you want he print to have extra adhesion, but it DOES raft under the whole object in addition to the supports, making the bottom "messy" Great my video helped. :D Hit like and sub for more ! <3

depends. sometimes the interface layers alone does not give a perfectly smooth surface. Then you can in addition add a small solid layer before the print continue with petg.. The point with this video is that you always should NOT use flush into infill if you have different types of filament say PETG and PLA, you should never flush into innfill as it will weaken the printed structure.

denada animal! :D

i do not print that hot. max 215 as it will ooze out too much. TPU drool so easily.

3% seam gap, 0.08mm layerheight, do not cross walls, no brim, no supports, gluestick and engineering plate, 25% spares infill, 50ms first layer, 105ms first layer infill,

occationally jumps out for me too. Cost about €200 for a new set, as it has electronic lock, but you can sometimes buy spare parts from crashed cars where the sides are OK.

Hello, can you please tell me how you fixed it and what part need to be replaced? Thank you.

@@KarelTausek I did not actually fix it permanently, it still keeps popping out now and then. I think i will buy a used/spare one from a wrecked vehicle as a brand new one with electronic assemble cost about €200.

I tested that now. Indeed it will look like mine. but adjusting the angle and height of the chamfer is more difficult when you use revolve. So if you want to make it like i show in part #2, it is not as easy as using my method. thanks for sharing though. :)

@@nikolassmith1072 does your model cut the thread into the chamfer?

@@Toffypops I use a triangle shape to cut the chamfer, and it does 'start' the thread a little above center line(my version). I am pretty sure you can make it start anywhere by just moving the triangle up or down the thread though.

@@nikolassmith1072 In my version you simply adjust the chamfer value to make sure the thread hits the bottom. No need to edit a sketch. Much easier than having to go in and modify the sketch to change the chamfer. Thanks for sharing, watching and commenting though. :D

That would require an offset, a sketch and a circle, and extrude-cut..so a few more steps, but yea, also a way to do it. :D My way is a bit faster though, but thnx for the suggestion. :)

i cannot help with that. :)

it is not in autodesk since if you slice the stl without splitting it to parts i treats the holes as open spaces when sliced. When you split to parts it happens

@@Toffypops But this is the problem of STLs. They don't contain information about volumes. They only contain surfaces made of triangles. With that option you tell the program if the STL contains a single volume with holes or multiple bodies without holes. You cannot have both at the same time with an STL.

When you print with Fusion 360, it temporarily converts the print body to another format, in my case STL, and when i print that way, it is perfectly able to understand that there are no fills in the areas. So why the slicer could not be made to interpret this and adjust accordingly I do not understand based on your theory above.

ok i think i understand better now, so you cannot paint support blockers inside the model after splitting to parts? here are some other suggestions for workarounds -- enable supports on build plate only, and then either -- paint ON where you want the supports on the inner lip to be -- or since it seems your object is hollow at the bottom try tree supports. another solution is split to parts>change hole parts to negative part, then copy paste the hole parts, for these new hole parts change type>support blocker, select these blocker holes again and scale to e.g. 105%. a better description of the bug is probably that it seems impossible to paint supports/support blockers on negative parts, though it may be considered a missing feature, not a bug

This is definately a bug. The main problem here is that since these parts are inside..setting supports to baseplate only will not work. It will still make supports. If you use the negative part way, it will not correctly print the walls, top and bottom of the holes. This is a bug since a slicer should ignore open holes all together so people can paint support blockers. I do not want to use % to increase the size of the holes as the magnets may get dragged out of the holes due to them being attracted to the nozzle. If the part is exported using the 3d print feature in fusion 360 it does not generate objects from empty spaces. But it will only print 1 object at a time So basically it is the split-to-parts feature that is bugged. It should ignore open spaces inside the model. The only alternative I found was to make cuts in fusion above and below holes and then select those parts as 100% infill and then import an stl of the holes and select them as negative modifiers...That would leaves walls intact but still not make it possible to paint support blockers. This problem when splitting to parts is so unneccessary it should be fixed. Many thanks for comments and feedback. 😊

@@Toffypops well... sorry if this gets complicated :) 1. in the exported file the 'holes' ARE objects/parts, meaning they have their own independent geometry, just inside geometry of another part 1b. possible bug/missing feature would be that the "hole" parts are not set to type "negative part" automatically 2. if you do split to parts, then select a hole and change type for that to negative part, then slice, are you saying that outside the hole there are no walls? i cannot replicate that, or i do not understand. i do not see a difference between a non-split object with holes and a split object with hole parts set to negative parts -- after slicing. 3. i did not suggest to increase the hole size -- the suggestion is to set hole parts as negative parts, then copy/paste them, and these new copies should be set to type "support blocker" - to make sure they block supports they may need to be increased a few% - this does not increase the hole size 4. there is a difference between split to parts and split to objects, all of this is only applicable when using split to parts 5. i do not understand the line "if the part is exported.." 6. if you have a negative part inside another part and have supports on baseplate only, there should be NO supports inside the negative part. are you saying there are?

if you export a part to an stl-file and then bring it into orca and split it to parts, each part keep their relative places in the geometry. If you split to objects, everything is places on the buildplate which is not what you would want. I understand the split to part makes objects out of empty spaces, but this does not happen when i use the 3D PRINT feature in Fusion 360, then the object comes out with holes correctly. Although you cannot print several holes at the same time. I tried to set the holes as objects to negative parts, and all i end up with is infill missing the objects without walls going around it. And if you set supports on baseplate only, it will still put supports on objects where they have overhanging walls inside another object. It does not work for open spaces inside the model itself. I actually did not see that you had an "add support blocker" feature. Still learning . That might work as you say if you expand it to "paint" the support areas. Thnx for commenting. :)

@@Toffypops this would be easier if i could post an image, but let me try to describe the settings as precisely as possible 1. under global>support, "enable support" should have a filled green box with checkmark; "on build plate only" should have a filled green box/checkmark; near the bottom under advanced "don't support bridges" should have a filled green box/checkmark 2. hole parts in the split object should be set to type "negative part", not modifier or anything else. negative parts have a small green circle with a minus symbol to the left of their name 3. under global>quality>overhangs "make overhangs printable" should NOT be checked, it should just be a white empty box if you slice with these settings exactly, you should NOT be getting any supports inside the holes/negative parts, but hopefully there should be walls

Not easier to create as a solid. But sometimes the surfaces are out of alignment and not as easy to make a perfectly fitting sketch of. A sweep would require a specially made guideline in 3D space to function properly. Thnx for the comment. :)

Glad it helped

Glad it was helpful!

Thnx for watching!

Se nada! 😀 sub an d like por favor! 😅

@@Toffypops ok

Thanks for the visit. In my case as long as you always reference the exact distance between the lines and use it as the offset value, it offsets cocentric to the same lines with exact lenght, and make sure it is constrained. :) Many ways to do things.

You're welcome!

You're welcome!

Indeed. There may be residue att he nipple but should not pose a problem. If the filament flow without "curling" on the way out , the nozzle is pretty clean.

people leach then move on. :D Moar Thumbs pls!

CTRL-R -> services.exe Check list of services if you find something you can stop.

Any time!

Glad it helped!

Happy to help

the inner face did not connect first time since i was lofting to the wrong object which was not a solid surface.

glad it helped!

you're welcome!

Glad it helped!

You're welcome!

Thank you!

Great to hear such feedback! Thank you! Please sub and like for more. 😃

I already tried tried to address it. will try to boost it more in next recording.