Видео

JFK was shot twice from the front. Undeniable.

And yet, after 60+ years, Lone Nutters are still the minority. Yet you all continue to whine and argue with us critics. If you're so certain of Oswald's guilt, why not just move on? Why do you all still stick around? Could it be because deep down, you know there was a conspiracy? But you can't admit it? We aren't "theorists" or "paranoid." We follow the evidence where it leads. We point out the holes in the official story, because there are dozens. But you all ignore them or dismiss them. Had you looked at ALL the information that's available, on BOTH sides of debate, without any background knowledge, as I did, you'd conclude there was a conspiracy.

Tom, now Tucker et al are saying that Oswald couldnt shoot........and the rifle sucked......... all false !!! all of it false !!!!

I've decided to become a conspiracy theorist. "Ford Moved The Wound On Kennedy's Back" "Ford Was Rewarded For The Coverup With The Presidency"

Thanks. We are bound to carry a cross, mirror, and silver stake as long as we live. There are NO new conspiracy theories that don’t involve outer space. But the what? hundreds? of long debunked and buried rise in the dark with a regularity that would make Drac himself quit for good in shame. Some are so crusty that I’ve forgotten how and when they were (quickly) balonified.

George H W Bush vice president elect - John Lennon assassinated before Reagan/Bush were sworn in. 3 months later President Reagan's attempted assassination.

Weisberg was an interesting character, my friend used to talk to him regularly. Last time he tried to call, Harold's wife answered and said "Harold's Not Feeling Well, He Can't Come To The Phone Right Now"............He died shortly thereafter.

Sir. Thanks. Well, our conspirators haven’t changed their M.O. in ~60 years. They are STILL using low speed yo-yo operators to do their nasty deeds. I mean, Oswald? Squeaky Fromme? Hinkley? That creep in Butler? The clown Sunday? Um, you recognize sarcasm when it’s presented, don’t you?

Just something to consider is that many Conspiracy Authors were lying, some were just plain wrong and believed but many were conmen. Mark Lane, Jim Marrs those guys knew Oswald acted alone....Guys like David Lifton & Robert Groden may have known deep down their theories were crazy but almost brainwashed themselves into believing they were true..........The psychology of the whole thing is fascinating.

Thanks. I’m all sarcastic wit’d out on this topic, but - 6:08 you thinking “Goldfinger”, like I am?

The added commentary was enlightening. Not necessarily in relation to this event, but in a much broader scope. The quote ," I think therefore I am" I never thought deeply into that quote before. Your discussion on that quote provided me with more knowledge that will help me understand why people have opposing points of view.

When at 7:16 Roberts says, "there are a dozen books propounding conspiracy and the list is growing" (that was 1967), I should have annotated according to Wikipedia, there are now between 1,000 and 2,000 books, mostly pro-conspiracy about the assassination.

The excerpt you read from Bugliosi's book, i.e., about Lee's failed attempts to persuade Marina, the very night before the 22nd, to move to Dallas with him to raise their family, is one of the primary reasons I'm convinced he alone was responsible for JFK's assassination. If he was part of a conspiracy, he wouldn't have tried to persuade her to make that move--precisely because, if she HAD agreed, what do you suppose his co-conspirators would have done to him for backing out? And not him only but Marina and their two daughters? It was ONLY because he was the sole assassin that he pleaded with her to move to Dallas--otherwise, his pleas make no sense whatsoever.

I don't doubt Marinas words that she believes Lee wouldn't have done the assassination had she agreed to moving into an apartment with him. And it is quite possibly true. However, would it have? Lee had already tried to take out General Walker. And also at least started to plan the possibility of shooting either Nixon or Johnson. (I think Marina was mistaken on which VP she thought she heard him say) I think marina thinks she talked him out of the VP assassination, so she could have prevented the JFK assassination, and therefore, blames herself. But with Oswald history, it appears also possible that he was determined to pull off a high profile assassination. If she did agree to move in with him Oswald still would have been tempted with all the circumstances surrounding the motorcade route. Marina shouldn't feel the assassination was a direct result of how she behaved to Lee. Ultimately Lee did the killing, not her.

Sir. Thanks. The night before… these many decades later I almost crack a smile. In his pleadings with Marina that evening, Oswald made the same mistake that ALL of us sw…… ..cks (rhymes with dingging swicks) make with our gals: they will be enticed by washers, driers, vacuum cleaners, or new toaster ovens, as we are by fishing rods, multi-tools, comic books, ->

You said you’re going to debunk what the other sides opinioni is.but you haven’t even read it yet lol

The Warren Omission

ruclips.net/video/Ayf5lbLmj2Q/видео.html Hosty explainsthe note from Oswald in detail.

problem with too many conspiracy writers is they only want to sell books and the conspiracy side is usually the best sellers

Russo said there was 5 shooters ... all the 5 families. I believe they told Jackie to blow his head off by placing a small canon under his left ear. That's why there are no photos from the left side of the car. That's why the Zapruder film is on the right side of the car. All the shooters are simply distractions. See the videos on my channel. Connelly didn't say "they're gonna kill us all ... " ... he said "do it now, or they'll kill us all ... ". The most obvious fact that it was a setup is that no one knew the parade route as it was changed at the last minute.

Where the agents were when the shots hit still in the car wow Clinton Hill. Only responded

Thanks. I was growing up in Brazil when that show ran (no! Dad was not a diplomat or a missionary. He was capitalist industrialist - and probably a robber baron). TV was like, 1 channel, 4 hours in the evening. In Portuguese. Go figure. Shows still lame.

Craig has too many statements contrary to the evidence that i likely assume his motives are financial and i tend to not believe him. If just the rambler comment, maybe i could believe him but argue that it doesnt necessarily mean oswald got into it. It could have just been a random car that happened to be there at that time. It is a busy thoroughfare in dallas. However, with all his other claims. I dont believe him even that far. To see "mauser" stamped on the barrel of the rifle. I could grant that to the mandela effect. He heard someone say mauser. He saw the barrel. Put 2 and 2 together and thought he saw the "mauser" stamp. Plausible. But because of his other comments. It appears to instead have been just made up. Why would one (and only one) officer notice so many contrary things? One inconsistency could be written off as a perspective issue causing a mistake in memory. All of his, i tend to not believe them as honest errors, but rather outright lies for publicity. Not saying he is a liar, but saying he very much appears to be a liar. (You know how many times i comment about how inconsistent statement may have other logical reasoning behind them, in Craigs case, nope. I plainly dont believe him)

Did the Rambler take Lee over to Tippitt ?????????? hmmmm ???

"The Idiocy of Mark Lane's Film" is not a good way to start out. Rodger Craig was voted the Policeman of the year. He was a decorated member of the Dallas Police force. He had absolutely no reason to lie. And on top of it, 3 other witnesses on the knoll stated they saw an "Oswald look-alike" run down the knoll and get into a station wagon driven by a dark complected man. One woman stated it if were not Oswald, it was his twin brother. The very same thing that Captain Curry said. To say that Mark Lane ignored the evidence is really not accurate. Always remember that every single piece of evidence that was handled by the Dallas Police is suspect. There was almost no chain of evidence on the 6th floor, or in the Tippit Murder. Even the Witness testimony is a mess as the TIppit witnesses had to be told the names of the suspects to get a positive I.D.

Thanks. DPD, Keystone Coppish as they might have been, had the case solved by midnight. Long-debunked stuff just keeps auto resurrecting. How to contradict a conspiratorial friend? Hey. My psycho training was the United States Marine Corps. Can’t help you.

There's all kinds of stuff said about Roger Craig over the years but there's a 41 second video that's just a printed quote from a Conspiracy Believer that knew him and she would tell you he was very troubled and not believable. The video is "Mary Ferrell On Roger Craig".........Also his own Daughter said he was really messed up as well and she actually blames the Conspiracy Crowd for feeding his paranoia and leading to his suicide. He of course discredits himself with contradictory statements but even some of his Conspiracy Brethren were honest enough to come out and say he wasn't believable..........Sylvia Meagher called Craig a "Flagrant Liar".

Amos Euins saw a person firing a rifle. Also Brennan testified that he didn’t see a rifle discharge or recoil, so he didn’t really see a rifle being fired - merely being aimed.

Two thoughts. First mentioned in your video, but not an aspect of the video..the coke bottle. I saw or read an interview with a (i think) secretary who ran into oswald in the breakroom at about 12:05. I only read it once and dont recall the source. (My apologies) what nobody points out on either side of the debate is how does it have to be that oswald bought the coke after running down the stairs after the shooting. If he was in the breakroom about half an hour before the assassination, why couldnt he have bought it then? Even if that interview doesnt exist because i cannot recall the source, him having a coke in his hand when truly and the officer arrived still doesnt prove he had just bought it. Second, in your living diagram of the tippit murder, you had oswald walking west. Was that because you believe he was walking west, or just because of the limited space? Ive been back and forth on if he was walking east or west many times. It doesnt matter in the grand scheme of things, it doesnt change the fact he shot Tippit. I have just noticed in recent years, more researchers (on both sides) believe he was walking west.

16:30 powerful words, but obviously later artistic license

Thanks. I, not having the most organized mind on the planet, had to listen through 3 times to sort out all the actors and circumstances. I wonder why we are so taken with implausible unsubstantiated years, decades, later assertions. A Tippit treatment recently popped up in my “for you”. I listened to the first seven words, bailed on the eighth, I was getting homicidal. Same old tripe.

Westbrook "Discovered a wallet." Actually he could not remember who gave it to him. Croy admitted that he had given the wallet to Westbrook and he too could not remember who gave it to him. Croy was seen by Jeana Davis who said he was on the scene of the crime within seconds of the shooting. He stated he spoke to several witnesses but could not remember the name of a single person. And as the first officer on the scene he DID NOT FILL OUT A REPORT. Mrs. Holum stated that she saw from her 2nd-floorr window directly across the street that there was a 2nd police car in the alley blocked by Tippit's car. She stated that the car reversed through the alley with an officer on foot following it. That means a cop car left the scene immediately after the murder without investigating the crime of a fellow officer. I think Westbrook and Croy are definitely suspect.

At 2:25 we see a still image from what looks like an 8mm color movie showing not only Mr. Bremmer, but the little girl who was running along as Kennedy’s limo turned onto Elm St. It seems the vantage point might be on the 2nd or 3rd floor of the School Book Depository. Where is the rest of this film? Inquiring minds want to know!

Does anyone else find it strange that they tried to use camera shaking as proof a shot was/wasn’t fired? That’s only the case if the camera man even heard the shots. Which has been found he claims he didn’t hear any shots.

Could the puff of smoke actually been the president’s plume of brain matter, or would the angle make that impossible?

I’ve slowly come to realize that America was only anti-Nazi for a short time, and after the war, integrated Nazis into NATO and other institutions. In Ukraine, Nazis are the muscle of the puppet dictatorship. Jon Stewart put a medal on one of them.

The cheering sounds added in, like someone is turning up a dial and then turning it down again. Sorry, I’m getting cynical

Sir. Thanks. Wunner wadda happen if we told an Antifa (NAZI!) creep that President Kennedy was a DEMOCRAT.

Unfortunately, this amusing presentation is not grounded in facts. The JFK assassination and the Warren Commission that followed was not an actual Investigation. It was a very clumsy attempt to save the LBJ presidency that was in the middle of a very important Campaign. The entire focus of the Warren Report was Oswald's guilt and it was based on the notion that Oswald was a loser seeking fame. And yet every action he took screamed of an innocent man. He stated over and over he had not shot anyone. (hardly the actions of a braggard) They said he was a loser. Think about that. He was 23 yrs old when he supposedly traveled to Mexico City to apply for a Visa at the Russian Embassy. (You know, the guy that was photographed 20 times and yet all the pictures are of a man much older with a different body type.) Oswald spoke 3 languages fluently and he had a higher security clearance than his commanding officer. He was married with 2 children and he had no history of violence or arrests. But for the Apologists, it is easier to believe in the bullet that transited two people and made 7 wounds. All because they have to make 9 wounds fit into a two bullet scenario. Even the best Apologists, (And this guy is not one of them) could not convince the American People they were being lied to. 60 years ago 70% of the public rejected the WR, and they still reject it today.

There never was a case for the lone gunman. A "deformed" bullet. They had 4 other bullets that they used to attempt to duplicate what the magic bullet did. They used cotton, water, a cadaver, and a goat. All of the bullets were crushed, even the one that went through cotton. But the magic bullet? It went through a dozen layers of clothing and a back brace at a 17 degree downward angle and it transited 2 people, "tumbled" and made 7 wounds. The problem with #399 is that the orderly who found it stated very clearly it was NOT THE BULLET HE FOUND. His bullet was pointed. Of course when he appeared before the commission Thompson was never asked the one question that mattered. "Is #399 the bullet you found?" Can you imagine that? The one piece of evidence that makes the Magic Bullet relevant and they never asked the most important witness that question. Do you know why? Because they knew the answer would be, NO! The WR is a complete sham, and nobody knows that more than Posner himself.

All three shots Posner says. What about the 4th 5th 6th or 7th shot? With all the bullets found at Bethesda, Dealey Plaza, and Parkland, It is too bad we only have #399. Even worse? Thompson who found it on the stretcher, stated that #399 was not even the bullet he found. He was very clear that his bullet was pointed, not rounded. The interesting thing is that when he appeared in front of the Commission, the one question that was essential to establishing the validity of the bullet and Thompson as a witness was never even asked. They asked him about everything else. Where he found it, when he found it, but not the question that mattered. "Is #399 the bullet you found?" And the reason for that is because they knew the answer would be, NO! Posner the chief Apologist for the failed Warren Report is the greatest cheerleader for the magic bullet. Because without it, they have to admit the existence of a Conspiracy. Instead the entire Report relies on a bullet that made 7 wounds and transited two people through a dozen layers of clothing and a back brace that JFK was strapped into.. It is a complete farce. It didn't happen. But you gotta hand it to him. He tells the lie eloquently!

Ah yes. More coincidence theorist stuff. I’m glad i’m not part of the gullible bunch thinking a lone gunman with a mediocre marksmanship shot off 3 rounds in 5.6 seconds each when no marksman from the FBI could make those shots that fast using the carano rifle.

This Crooks guy too wasnt a good shot,at least based upon his performance in Butler. Yet still one of his shots grazed his target. I think its way too premature to rule out all conspiracy. But everything so far points to lone nut. And if there was, at most, it might have been a friend helping with scoping location, or helping him train. Something to the scope of a Terry Nichols to a Timothy McVeigh, not a vast organizational conspiracy. But even that doesnt seem likely.

Sir. Thanks! I was waiting for this, but I knew it was coming! Within MINUTES of the tragedy (Corey Compensatore, rest in the peace of Christ) dear folks for whom I have the highest regard were unburdening fears of conspiracy upon me. When I rolled my eyes at ‘em, theirs glazed over as if they knew they were talking to a moron. Maybe they were. INCOMPETENCE does not equal conspiracy. Background checks are instantaneous. And you still need a haircut.

This kind of intelligent, rational reporting is sadly a lost era from a world of journalism that is lost I fear forever.

LBJ was a horrible president

Mr. Vincent, I mean no disrespect to the Tippit family, in fact, I would expect them to defend his character as a husband and father. However, I disagree with your conclusions. I know you are aware of the controversy surrounding his murder. The conflicting accounts from the witnesses, two different shell casings found at the scene, witnesses that weren't called before the Warren Commission to tell what they saw. The fake Oswald wallet found at the scene, which conveniently disappeared when Oswald had a wallet on him at the Texas Theater. A photographer took a picture of it being shown at the Tippit scene. Please convince me these things didn't occur when so many people believe they did.

NOTICE: YT and t vince scrub all critical comments n replies. Likely a d n c hack, paid influencer , Caro supervised via LBJ library. They have to protect the fact they whacked their own prez in exchange for social programs and guv contracts, as a bonus they covered party crimes. Anyone honest knows this, and will

Hey friend Luckily the first book I read after the Warrren report was "Kennedy and Lincoln" by Dr Lattimer. followed by Case closed. Its obvious to me LHO acted alone. most conspiracy authors are just selling books

Follow the name game in JFK - here's one: the name Roberts appears here, there, everywhere, as in Bannister's lover, Paine's neighbor, the idiot in the TSBD on 5th, the FBI jerk, the cop on the street, and of course, the safe house run by Johnson, housekept by the witch on Beckley (while on the phone with her sister, etc.) Williams is another one, and just as sinister as this.