Видео

Much has gone extinct in way too short a time.

What some people don't realize is that seeds stay dormant until the proper environment to grow. Every time I've seen a place that was cleared of trees, eventually they all grow back. As long as the soil has NOT been "cultivated", for a lack of a better term.

How bout you don't narrate anything like that anymore. It was an interesting idea, but having to hear you explain that by being in front of the greenhouse you are no longer a few feet above ground but on ground level. My dude, is you making a video for your 4 year old with down syndrome?

This guy does seem a bit nutty. If you read his writing you just notice so many things

thanks for the video! hope everything's good with you!

You caught me, I'm here doomscrolling when I should get back to learning about permaculture.

All that stored fat, so much survival!

Musk has a lot of engineers working for him, but are there any biologists or ecologists? Seems important if you want to found a self sustaining community on another planet.

I really appreciate you making these videos

Paul has always struck me as a very weird guy, even as someone who's only seen a handful of his videos and pretty much all of them back in 2020 when I was deep into my super depressive doomer phase that i jad been building up to for a few years at that point. Him buying into great man theory esque Musk hype isn't exactly surprising, it's just disappointing

We have to hang onto our mental health because it leads to bad physical health that we all need to be as good as we can physically. You're not wrong here. I can't believe I stumbled into this channel!

The "That didn't happen" is regards to CO2 levels that haven't occurred in the past 3 million years or more for the arctic!! So Peter Wadhams ALSO said the arctic ice would be gone. GEE McFearSun has long said that the "linear model" was wrong. So it's off by 10 years - big deal. James E. Hansen also emphasizes the Aerosol Masking Effect as the MAIN cause of warming now. This is corroborated by Daniel Rosenfeld's research - you can look it up - it's twice as bad as previously thought. That means a 40% decrease in burning coal (sulfates) heats up Earth another 1 degree Celsius.

"the scientists don't do that because they know where the baseline is"? That's a logical error called "brown-No$ing" hahaha.

If you're such a "hot shot" on arctic methane why don't you just use googlescholar to read the latest research from Natalia Shakhova? First Calibrated Methane Bubble Wintertime Observations in the Siberian Arctic Seas: Selected Results from the Fast Ice by Denis Chernykh 1,2,3,* [ORCID] , Natalia Shakhova 1,2,3, Vladimir Yusupov 1,2,4 [ORCID] , Elena Gershelis 2,5,6 [ORCID] , Boris Morgunov 3 and Igor Semiletov 1,2,3,5,* 1 V.I. Ilyichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690041 Vladivostok, Russia 2 Laboratory of the Arctic Land Shelf Interaction, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia 3 Institute of Ecology, Higher School of Economics (HSE), 101000 Moscow, Russia 4 Federal Scientific Research Center “Crystallography and Photonics” RAS, Institute of Photon Technologies, 108840 Moscow, Russia 5 School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia 6 International Research Center for Ecology and Climate Change, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 354340 Sochi, Russia "In winter, the flux of CH4 transported by rising bubbles to the bottom water in the shallow part of the ESAS was estimated at ~19 g·m−2 per day, while the flux reaching the water/sea ice interface was calculated as ~15 g·m−2 per day taking into account the diffusion of CH4 in the surrounding water and the enrichment of rising bubbles with nitrogen and oxygen. We suggest that this bubble-transported CH4 flux reaching the water /sea ice interface can be emitted into the atmosphere through numerous ice trenches, leads, and polynyas. This CH4 ebullition value detected at the water/sea ice interface is in the mid high range of CH4 ebullition value estimated for the entire ESAS, and two orders higher than the upper range of CH4 ebullition from the northern thermocarst lakes, which are considered as a significant source to the atmospheric methane budget."

Oh my gosh I've enjoyed this analysis so much!

what evidence do you have that "Sam" is "not" a scientist? NONE! Actually you switch from his blogs back to "arctic-news" without actually scrutinizing "arctic-news" itself! That's much sloppier than any accusations you make against "sam carana." Just go back into the archives of Arctic-news - you obviously are not interested in the specifics of the blog content and just want to dismiss it. Maria Carmen Solana was posting using the SAME graphics as "sam carana" - and she has done scientific research on the same topics - and she is a professor. She suddenly stopped using her name and yet the same info with the same graphics continued as "sam carana."

Wow!!!!! 👆

At least Lay a covering on the ocean floor where the deposits are, and perforate to mine and use, instead of allowing an eventual disaster. Methane caltrates/hydrates are potential energy sources and are many time greater than all of the world's oil and coal deposits combined.

What do you think overall about the "imminent runaway warming from methane via permafrost melt positive feedback loop" or whatever you'd call it. It's something that has concerned me in the past but I've increasingly noticed that almost everyone panicing about it are people in blogs and comment sections, not actual scientists. As I understand from the literature I've seen, we still don't have a good understanding of how exactly methane is released from permafrost when it melts, if significant amounts are released at all. Also that methane has a much shorter lifespan in the atmosphere than CO2. Anyway, I don't actually know anything so would be interested in what you think.

Sam Carana is a Volcanologist. I know him personally. We have met. He cofounded the Arctic Methane Emergency Group (AMEG). You made the wrong assumption when you said he works for a company. He works for a government. That is how he gets classified information. Annually we have not crossed 2°C but we have crossed 1.5°C. We had one month at 2°C globally. This coming summer is going to be absolutely brutal and if you want to keep misinforming people then by all means do. The world is overpopulated as it is and people are going to die. You cannot have exponential growth on a finite planet. Do yourself a favor and look at crop losses in the past year. It won't matter where you are because every country is seeing crop losses. That is why food prices keep going up. The IPCC is too conservative in their reports and every scientist out there will tell you the same thing. Everything they said that would be happening in 2100 is happening right now 76 years too soon. But by all means, spread misinformation because that denial isn't going to save you or anyone else. China is the biggest threat with their greenhouse gases and there is nothing anyone can do to stop them. So accept it and move on.

Great stuff, very enlightening 👏

If humans are overpopulated, for every 1 human baby born there are ~572 other babies born onto farms. We need to stop breeding other beings to kill and eat them. Animal agriculture uses 83% of global farmland and only provides 18% of global calories. When we switch to a plant based food system, we can restore/reforest 76% of global farmland AND be able to feed all humans. -journal Science Animal agriculture is the leading cause of deforestation, habitat destruction, water pollution, ocean dead zones and *species extinction* . -United Nations FAO

Hi. Just letting you know that these videos do help me. Please continue to post. Thanks!

I don't tend to separate non-life from nature. So, life is a product of nature. The image is a still. Do you suppose the frog wouldn't try to eat the butterfly? That the tree branch isn't part of a tree that would consume the droppings, or the decomposed remains of the frog when it dies? How about the cycles of nature that life has become adapted to, such as tides, seasons, night and day? It's all processes. The chemical processes that were influenced by the cycles to bring life about. I don't think we're nearly as separate from non-life as you appear to think. When we talk about the nature of something, I guess there are different interpretations, your reference to anthropomorphism being one of them. I tend to think of "the nature" of something as its properties, its limits, its relationship to the rest of what it is within the range of influence of other elements of its environment. The early part of the earth's existence was still undergoing processes that brought life about. There are many extinction events that took place over the course of earth's existence. There are even questions regarding what actually brought about the extinction of the dinosaurs. Flood Basalts being a key one. And the reason there is suspicion is that the history of Flood Basalts correlates to tightly to extinction events. That doesn't mean the meteor didn't have an effect. And I realize correlation isn't causation. But much of the time, changes in environment to the point where only a few can survive, are the cause of mass extinctions. Right now, we're in an upset of the carbon cycle. We've upset that cycle. Institutions have upset that cycle. When you say life needs to fight for its survival, I agree. But we're not alone. There is a life that is fighting for its survival. The life of the corporation. The life of the wealthy. And they're fighting the other corporations threatening to steal their dominance. The fossil fuel industry vs anything that detracts from their ability to maintain dominance. And they have the resources to inject influence in many arenas that influence our existence. They have worked diligently to undermine labor, which, in the past, acted as a limiter to their expansion, by destroying the culture of unionism and organizing. This is another environmental imbalance that has brought about the rise of waste and income disparity to the point where the disparity stratifies more and more. Some think this is a good thing. They think that the wealthy know better what to do with resources. It's a myth. Their greatest concern is competition. And I think the only way of bringing balance back is to promote labor organizing. It can be a very powerful force. You can't protect yourself from an institution except by the use of another institution.

I wouldn't have much problems with the solitaire panda, not wanting to mate, going extinct. Nor with the suffering milkcows or meatchickens, although it would be sad for the last ones alive. I hate to see insects dying because of a too long drought (I mean, in my normally always wet country. During dry periods I carry a juice bottle, just to save desperate bees/wasps). Footage of an orangutan defending his forest against machines, I had to turn off. I just related to much. It's the same as seeing people suffer from hunger or war. Empathy doesn't stop because it's not near. And there has to be a story. Your butterfly/frog picture doesn't tell much. If a rock drops on their head, I wouldn't feel sad. I would feel sad if the frog would eat the butterfly alive though. I hate suffering. Mother nature can be cruel too. Unconsciously: I have 2 types of dream in which I swim. Sometimes in nature, those are beautiful. Sometimes in a tilled bath, those are nightmares.

I appreciate the heads up. Showing is better than telling. In your McPherson video, you show Carana's creative line fitting that is very striking, that McPherson seizes to support near term human extinction. Walking us through some of that would be much more compelling thank telling us he is not a scientist and doing things wrong.

Hi there. I don't have access to climate reanalyser. Are antarctic heat waves a new thing, or are past years' peaks also due to antarctic heat waves?

Good video! Thank you. The Arctic sea ice is looking not so good the last few days…the chart anyhow. The Antarctic sea ice appears to be on a downward spiral and temps are looking above average. 2024 is going to be a doozy 🥵

I was wondering, what exactly are your thoughts on the late Michael Dowd? I know you made a remark about him in your Guy McPherson, but I'm curious about what your thoughts on him and his ideas are. There's a lot of people I'd like to ask your opinion on, but I don't want to bombard you with a ton of questions, so I'd like to ask you in advance if I can ask them

Good presentation, thanks 👏

I try to search up your channel and all I get is clips for show called brickleberry

Yeh iunno if I agree with that bit about us having to give up extended lifespans to reduce strain on ecosystems. I'm sure Improvements to medical technology and such could allow life expectancy to increase (or at least decrease slower until reaching a stable level) if the right life style changes were made I think it's unlikely we'll make those changes but I can't imagine it would be physically impossible

In my country retirement age currently is 67, and by the time I'm that age (I'm 57 now) they expect it to be 67 and 9 months. For the people with nice, good payed jobs, I think that's okay. But for the people with low payed and often physical jobs that's to late, specially given that they die much younger.

thank you for this. really helped me calm down. im still confused (and stressed) with hansen's paper, even jf it hasnt been peer-reviewed yet. is he saying that were going to see 10 degrees celcius within our lifetimes? sorry if it sounds like a dumb question. my anxiety is fixated on the environment right now

5 min to long? 😂 I can handle 5 min. It's the hours to long, or the daily repeating themselves I dislike.

I live in the Netherlands (in between South England and North Germany). We were just north of this summer's heath dome, with a slightly wet and cold summer as a result. Most people didn't realise how lucky we were, and still are (cheap vegetables).

Short but clear. Just the way I like it. 👍🏻

Could you please elaborate on the comment about there likely not being people to monitor the satellite data? Are you expecting collapse to be in such a state by say the 2040s that there will be a significant population reduction or something of that sort? Or is it something else?

In regards to contracting, you said that we shouldn't get a dog after losing one to old age. But what if I want to help raise animals in need? I love dogs and wish to see them be loved.

Next year is gonna suck, but the real worry is that it could be considered normal in a few decades

You brought some fair criticism regarding this article. I agreed with a lot of its content but I didn't like the conspiratorial tone it had, like the idea that all these new cops are hired to deal with the consequences of climate change. I also thought quite a few papers were misrepresented. I still think that you are too optimistic and that a global famine within the next decade or two is very likely and that there won't be humans by the end of the century.

How come this says 11 comments and only seven are visible and one of the missing ones is mine?

Whereabouts (roughly) are you getting cool, buggy summers? 🪲🐛 I'm jealous

Thank you for this analysis. I was once completely overwhelmed by thinking in worst case scenario way. Not only thinking that these scenarios are inevitable, but imminent as well. It certainly doesn't help, it is draining and instead of gathering people around you to help combat the problem puts them away. Thank you again :)

Appreciate the comments, I read this recently and it definitely is designed to freak someone out. I don't disagree with the general conclusion that shit is going to hit the fan, but some of it definitely seemed a little bit of an overreaction. Curious if you think there will be widespread impacts in the next 10-20 years - not societal collapse, but serious disruptions to our way of life - based on your research/knowledge. I know that's a fool's errand since no one can predict the future, but seems like we are making too little changes, too slowly.

Thank you for this review! I appreciate your perspectives and couldn't agree more with your final conclusions.

Thank you for the analysis. However, the idea that "my identity is irrelevant" isn't exactly true is it. We cannot verify your credentials without knowing who you are. If you want to be taken more seriously then a guy in a pickup and a ball cap ranting at a cell phone we need to know you are qualified. I'd like to respect your breakdown but I have no reason whatsoever to accept you are qualified counter his claims. Maybe you are, but how are we to know that?

Thank you. I read that piece and was confused about his intentions. As soon as I read the unproven and even conspirational statement about the US destroying Nordstream I came to the following diagnosis: The author might be a well-educated left-wing extremist. He tries to educate others with actually good studies and data, but concludes something that makes only sense to me when your intellectual edifice is rooted in the extreme left-wing dichotomy of good working class vs exploitative billionaires. And I say this as a moderately left-wing person myself.

I'm a lill sleep deprived and read through it in a less than ideal mental state, it felt like one hell of a sucker-punch. The Hansen paper aint exactly shitting rainbows but man, thanks for the little slap back to reality.

6:35 BuckleBerry says yes, do read the paper