Видео

Yeah, correct. Morning star is not identical to satan, sons of God (many angels) also called as morning stars. KJV was translated from Latin version, and "Lucifer" is a Latin word that means = "east star". This means the satan was one of those morning stars. I thought all pastors have this knowledge, but I see so many pastor didn't know what they are talking about. Pretty sad. People shouldn't use KJV anymore. To many mistake on translations since the KJV was translated from Latin, not translated from the original version (Hebrew for OT, and Greek for NT).

@@Blindfolded.911Yes. The KJV is actually a revision of the 1602 Bishops' Bible and it borrowed from all 16th century English Bibles, especially from Tyndale and even the 1582 Catholic Rheims NT. The translators did consult original language texts, but they also consulted foreign language sources including at least seven Latin translations; which included the Latin Vulgata and Old Latin. New Bible readers should avoid the KJV.

@@InfinitelyManic my country (both Catholic and Protestant) never used KJV translation since late 70s. We used new version which translated from the original version of Hebrew and Septuagint. Even the Septuagint itself will keep updating if there is another missing page/paragraph/verse of "authentic sea scroll" found. Idk why those people keep using KJV. The translations inaccurate and the gospel not updated (many missing verses).

@@Blindfolded.911 Which country?

Last I checked, God did not preserve (Psalm 12:6-7) his words in Latin. It is a dead language. You can run to the Greek Hebrew or Aramaic, or...Latin (why the Latin?) But the fact of the matter is, God has preserved his words in English for us today. He did not stop preserving or inspiring his words with the Latin. His preservation is evident before us all today, in this age. In the English language. The translators of the new bibles in English have changed a name in Isaiah 14:12 and given it a title that is given to The Lord Jesus Christ in Revelation 22:16. Satan has attacked Gods words at every turn, counterfeited everything good that God does or has. This is a prime example, he has taken a title that is not his. And there is no such book in the Bible called Revelations. It’s Revelation (or more accurately The Revelation of St. John the Divine).

@@biblebaptistchurchofsebast7448 My Goodness you didn't get the point, IF GOD as you say didn't preserve His words in LATIN, then WHY THE HECK DID YOU USE A LATIN WORD/Name (Lucifer) to prove your point on the NIV calling Jesus Lucifer (again LATIN) in Revelations? Are YOU using a DEAD language too, or just CHERRY picking from a dead language to prove YOUR point on a certain subject? Regardless, if you mention ANY word from a "dead language," you're somehow REVIVING it sir. IF you however, think that LATIN (that is ALL Latin words, phrases and articles) is a DEAD language, then you might as well do yourself a favor by NOT mentioning a name in LATIN, Ie., Lucifer. In Hebrew his name is Heylel. BUT despite that knowledge, you still did, so. And FYI, GOD did preserved HIS WORD in VARIOUS languages today NOT just the ENGLISH (are you a white supremacist?) BUT ALSO IN LATIN, HEBREW, SPANISH, JAPANESE, KOREAN and ALL OTHER LANGUAGES of the world to make the GOOD NEWS accessible to ALL creation. WHAT do you think is the REASON why The TRUE GOD gave the early disciples on ACTS at Pentecost the ability to speak in VARIOUS languages (although Latin JUST as English) is not mentioned on the list, IF HIS purpose was that The Good News is only to be delivered to various nations in ONE language/dialect? Besides, haven't you heard of Bible TRANSLATIONS? GOD is NO Racist mister, and the KJV in ENGLISH wasn't the ORIGINAL language Yeshua spoke. HalleluYAH, AMEN, Hosanna, the common expression WE Christians use, are they originally English OR Hebrew? BUT were they preserved today OR no? Sure they are OTHERWISE we wouldn't be uttering, using, writing them. Same thing with Latin---and mind you, "Latin is a dead language" is NOT found in Scripture, INCLUDING the kjv English TRANSLATION. That means the SCRIPTURE itself DOESN'T support your UNBIBLICAL Belief that "Latin is a dead language." The MERE fact that it still EXISTS in PRINTING today and available for ANYONE to read means it's NOT dead. In FACT not even Pilate think it's dead enough for him to inscribe the title above Yeshua's Head in 3 MAJOR LANGUAGES at the time. Even your kjv PROVES it so on--- Luke 23:38 (KJV) And a superscription also was written over him in letters of Greek, and LATIN, and Hebrew, THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS. AND John 19:20 (KJV) This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and LATIN. IF you think it's dead, WHY not try and OMIT the word LATIN in your Bible IF you dare risk suffer GOD's punishment for TAMPERING with HIS word and I think you already know the verse on Revelations, I'm sorry RevelatioN of Jesus Christ (Revelation 1:1) NOT of "saint John the Divine." Guess what, once again someone by GOD's Help, proved you wrong. GLORY to YAH PS Thank you for your correction on Revelations. You're right, there's no such book in the Bible called Revelations but Revelation, as there is ALSO no passage EVEN in the kjv of The Bible that says GOD only inspired the king James version of the Bible. 😊

@@raimiranda126 by dead I mean that it is not spoken anymore. Not that it does not exist or that we don’t get root words from it. And I just love how you jumped from me reading it in ENGLISH and believing that it has been preserved in English makes me a white supremacist and a racist. And I did not mean that God didn’t use the Latin language. He absolutely did, but he didn’t stop there. He went to German and English. He has his preserved words in many different languages. In English it is the King James because of the gross errors in all the other versions like the one this video points out. Of course English was not the original language. No one speaks the original Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek either. Just like Latin. That was my point. But hey, you keep your Latin and I will continue with the perfect, inspired, preserved WORDS of God in English.

@@biblebaptistchurchofsebast7448 yes yes, I mean no disrespect. But speak for yourself, what you say although based in history is NOT Scriptural. So you're telling Me to believe YOUR words more than Scripture? Sorry, I can't Have a good one and I pray for your enlightenment

@@biblebaptistchurchofsebast7448 PS Btw what you said is NOT entirely accurate or factual. I just did a FACT check on Google and found out that---(and this quote is a COPY-PASTE) "Latin is spoken by 1 billion people worldwide. Spain, Mexico, Argentina, Portugal, France, Italy, and Romania are just a few examples of countries where Latin is spoken." IF you doubt the VALIDITY of My words then why not TYPE them and post them on Google Engine to find out yourself? Pls Stop spreading HALF-truths to the public, BUT in fairness, since Our Lord didn't just criticized BUT shown appreciation to His Churches (or Called-Out Congregations), I applaud you on your excellent expositions on Christ-mas. As Messianic, we share the SAME belief

James Stewart I would not necessarily disagree with that. The problem I have is I can’t speak those other languages so I would have a hard time distinguishing that without looking to someone who does know the language in question.

FALSE PROPHET BERTRAND What???

911 ruclips.net/video/UvU6L838pWQ/видео.html

FALSE PROPHET BERTRAND They can’t even get the name of the book right. So how can I take this seriously. There is no Revelations in the Bible.

Watch the full videos rev12:9 Satan has decived u.

Please join facebook group PROPHETBERTRAND777