Видео

I think this low pass Is possible only in Ukraine

Absolutely beautiful. I've also been looking for this one too since 2009 Vlad. Beautiful Ave Maria. Thanks for posting.

I've been looking for this version since 2009. It's beautiful! I'm so happy I found it!!!! I love the Magica Theme by Duo. Thanks Vlad.

Это видео было снято в тот день, когда моего дяду расстреляли террористы :(

СУПЕР👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 👍

Great fun for all concerned but so utterly pointless .

ЭТО ВИДЕО КОГДА МОЙ БРАТ НАРОДИЛСЯ!

So sad to see. Rip from a UK commercial airline pilot to a Russian brother.

Как же Американскому Управляюшему колониальной Россией (президент) посещать место гибели Б 52 его не поймут хозяева .

Never expected the su25 to be able to actually take off from the skid ramp. Can it take off with a full combat load?

Для информации ветьнаме забыли уже о советской помощи их взгляд устремлен сторону запада..

Is anybody still watching this in 2015?

at least they aint polish.....now there are a real buncha crack aviators...lol. they could fuck up a cup of coffee. i bet this plane just sucks through fuel like you cant imagine.

probably happiness

@beergut111 Heehe)) You are clown)) USA DOES NOT HAVE ANY HEAVY SUPERSONIC AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILES))) JUST NONE, ZERO, NADA Just as USA does NOT have ANY supersonic cruise missiles or supersonic anti-ship missiles. And by stating such obvious bullshit - you revealed yourself as a complete liar - you not any kind of pilot - i doubt you even played any PC flight simulator)))

i didnt fly the b58. But it wasnt equiped with ag missles. it only carries nuclear bombs. and every air force, navy and marine aircraft is equipped with "supersonic" missles. every missle we have is supersonic. RUclips wont provide me with enough space to list them all. Your attitude is irritating. Stop being a kid and ill answer your questions provided they arent classified.

@beergut111 Really? Then name me which air-to-ground missile did B58 used? Or which supersonic missile (heavy) ANY Amecican bomber uses now mr. experienced pilot?

lol.....well they do. Ive flown for the Air Force for over 20 years. You'd be amazed at the stuff that is public knowledge, and the classified stuff would make you think it was out of a sci-fi movie. sorry to burst your bubble. Like i said this was probably a really good bomber, 30 years ago.

@beergut111 Sorry but actualy USA never had and has not anything comparable to Tu-22M3 and its highsupersonic air-to-ground missiles. And "stealth" is completely useless against such countries as Russia and out IAD - aspecialy counting that WE developed this stuff

lol aviano was never bombed.......you ned to calm down really. im sure this is a fine plane but like I said its really old technology. this is comparable to the USA's B58 Hustler, '50-'60's technology. You would be amazed at the stuff the US Air Force has operational RIGHT NOW that no one knows about. We'll hear about it in 20 years when they retire it though. Like the stealth fighter. now those are amazing planes.

The "spectacular" images of BGM-109 attacks ? Good, if Soviets would have ever choosed to show for the first time theirs main weapons to the world , instead of those missiles coming on theirs target at MACH 07 ,you could have observed 6 ton monsters (only the Kinetic energy delivered at the impact would have been greater than the total energi delivered by the BGM-109 explosion !!) coming at MACH -4 from 27 km of altitude with an explosion much than 4,3 times greater !!! Instead of Harpoons

at Batajnica. 5,2 minutes later the whole Aviano Airbase and almost all the aircraft present are reduced LITERALLY to a sprawl of smoking craters (hardened hangar included) . "easy to defend against it" Ah Ah It is a sustained MACH -2 delivery system of MACH-4 / 5 missile with NO EQUAL in any western arsenals still today . The only problems is that we have NEVER observed in action ANY type of Soviet /Russian main weaponry in ANY pasted war . Do you remember Gulf War ?

and some A-10s come at Aviano Air base and some and C-130 begin an intensive airlift effort . At 546,6 km of distance ten TU-22M3 take -off at Batajnica Air Base. Them in LESS than 4 MINUTES and HALF (considering also take off times and gain of altitude ) reach delivery range of 60 KH-22M returning just after delivery at MACH 2

yeah but everyone knows about it. easy to defend against it. Dont get the wrong idea, im sure this is fine plane. but its old technology.

to attack a target at over 300 km of distance,also with anti radiation passive homing, diving on it at MACH 5 !!! (it is the faster missile at world still today). I make an example for you : Kosovo crysis 1999 , ONU vote for embargo of Serbia , 2 day after 41 F-15 , 36 F-16

"not a bad plane, if used against a small, third world country" Ah Ah You should dedicate yourself to comic theatre . That up showed is an HIGH sustained SUPERSONIC bomber capable of very high and very low mission's flight pacts . One of that bomber can carry 3 KH-22M . A 6 tons monster with a warhead of one ton of HE-SX with an equivalent power yield of 4 ,3 BGM-109 Tomahawks capable to attack from 430 km of distance at MACH 4 diving on its target from 27 km of altitude ,or 10 KH-15 capable

@ganarzon You are missing point. Russia doesn't need any carriers. it is never waging agressive wars away from home. it was always a land power. The idea of this carrier in my opinion is to keep up, to maintain technology and skills to operate it 'just in case'.

not a bad plane, if used against a small, third world country. very effective. but it lacks a lot of technology and that makes it very vulnerable to western defenses.

likely, it would - russian supersonic anti-ship missiles have huge ranges and are carried by supersonic aircrafts (Tu-22M Backfire for one, specialized in the antiship role).

I think they would complain about the lesser maneuverability, but would love the electronics. Also, they would complain about the lack of metrical system... and the lack of vodka. ;)

The single F117 was shot down because it was stealth but not very maneuverable or equipped with sufficient countermeasures;and Col.Zoltan Dani was a very capable commander. However, neither F15 nor F/A-18 were shot down while many mig29 were shot down or bombed.The F4E is expected to serve even after most mig29 are retired.

around 6 tons

Which only proves that it's really a battleship in carrier clothes!

And also when take note that Ad. Kuznetsov is a crossover between an attack ship and a carrier, it has an armament of 12 SS-N-19 missles below the deck, which can carry a tactical nuclear warhead. The super carriers carry only defensive armament.

Which only proves that it's the greatest carrier based fighter in existance. The world "Stall" or lack of control doesn't exist for the SU-33

i wonder what will be the feeling of a russian pilot if he was given an american fighter to fly

Nightwish music fills me up with joy.

i remember a sign lifted up by some serbs it was saying : "We are sorry we did not know it was invisible " ^^

Russians are the only airforce in the world that are good enough to pull this shit off

Que máquina incrível!! "wooowwsh!!!!" parece saída de um filme de ficção científica!!! ( What a Incridble machine!! " woowwsh!!" it seems like an science-ficcion movie ship)

Yep. That's true.

WMG is bullshit...

Not like this one... The new carriers will be larger by around 12,000 tons and will use a catapult launch system instead of the ramp. And nuclear fueled also. And there will only be 2 by 2020. All over the Navy plans to have atleast 4. Which will all be to active and full operating capacity by 2040.

All aircraft are smoky when the engine revs stupid.

Well that's very nice, well done. Its a good thing we war nice don't you think.....other wise ..well?

wat the name of the mouvi?

Alright so what do they do then Piss and poop under themselves?

Наши молодцы!Я тогда уже думал,что проиграем...А почему игру киборги комментируют?)))

jj, to bude Hradec a přistání na CIAF 2000. Viděl jsem tu potvoru naživo, nádhera.

In Tu-22M no, but in Tu-160 yes.