Видео

3300 cc i want 700

they absolutely are allowed lol thats why they SELL AN ULTRALIGHT IVO PROP

you can put a 1000 hp turbine on an ultralight, if you can make weight stall and top speed limits

you cant put an ivo prop on a 103 IF IT CAN BE SET TO BREAK THE SPEED LIMIT, that means, it must be physically or otherwise restricted to a pitch that cant speed and cant be over ridden from the cockpit while in flight

the reason the ivo prop cant be LSA is the same reason no retracts, it makes it a COMPLEX AIRCRAFT

@@vg23air Those are my understandings of the subject. That is why I was asking about pitch data back to the engine computer to stop an illegal configuration. But that's what the told me.

You are not alone. 5 grand to cover wings is crazy.

@@kennethwallace5168 and the tail :)

@@kennethwallace5168 building a legal 103 aint cheap :)

@@kennethwallace5168 once i cover the fuse probably closer to 7k

@@kennethwallace5168 i did the math it drops 4.5 lbs when done

his was ready cause he had rib caps :)

yep, thats what i used in the 80's on models while other guys were doing fabric dope and paint. my models were ready in a day, theirs took weeks then they were afraid to fly them due to the level of effort involved in the build (hangar queens). ORACOLOR, it is a plastic. This is a fabric. But yeah been around for a long time.

@@vg23air I started flying in like 85 and we were well into the monokote days by then

@@clytle374 yeah, i said oracoat but thats paint, its oracover, monokote was patented in 1968 in the usa, oracover was patented worldwide in 1985 and is a completely different product that does basically the same thing. LANITZ-PRENA FOLIEN FACTORY GmbH, LANITZ-MODELLBAU in Berlin, was founded in 1975. Initially LANITZ-MODELLBAU produced and marketed model aircraft kits and accessories. Already in the late 1970s we distributed the first mass-produced ready-to-cover model airplanes, to be followed by the first ARFs. With the mass production of these ARF ranges the weak points of conventional covering films became obvious. But when they created oracover in 1985 they stopped all model stuff and went into the cover business with an eye to making covering for real planes. 1995 - Fusion of the sites Berlin and Leipzig 1995 the decision was made in favour of a merger between LANITZ-MODELLBAU BERLIN and PRENA-WERK LEIPZIG GmbH, with the new company name LANITZ-PRENA FOLIEN FACTORY GmbH reflecting the new facts. 1998 - Development of UV-blocked special polyester films Also in 1998, we developed UV-blocked special polyester films for applications in general aviation. 2009 - First covering ORALIGHT® film In 2009, we developed the first covering ORALIGHT® film. Now called Oratex

thanks, but not many can take my insanity :)

the difference in stitching the top on wood, and the cap strip, the cap strip would spread the load across the top off the rib, the stitch would concentrate it in one area. Might pull a glue joint apart.

$$$$ yep, half the weight, no sanding primer painting, wont burn, less likely to puncture from moose antlers and dents instead, heat fixes it. Damage can be fixed in an hour versus days with standard covering. Can do it in your kitchen, no cancerous MEK and other chemicals requiring fresh air respirators

Looks like a few people do it on the legal eagle, but most don't. Of course it has rib caps. YEP, so the issue there is weight, what weighs less, caps or lacing process. Which one is more labor ? If I were doing a legal eagle rib and capped it, I probably wouldn't lace it, I would investigate the weight trade off and if lace was lighter I might make the ribs without the cap (rib redesign) and lace it. I WONDER WHAT THE WIDTH OF THE LE CAP IS ???

@@vg23air Interesting stuff. The legal eagle doesn't cover the fuselage, so be a little cheaper for me. Less weight is is the name of the game. Don't know for sure if MEK is safe... At least it doesn't cause cancer. I bet I burn more solvents each day than you've ever seen. ;)

I haven't found any issues with the crank and racers are getting 90 hp at 10k rpm. The only issue I found was vehicle racers find rod bearing issues if the 1 inch crank is used versus 1 1/8 inch crank. I haven't found any complaints about the engines failing off the assembly line.

​@@vg23airI didn't realize it was all the 1 inch cranks, just thought it was specific ones. Figuring out what engine parts numbers are seems almost impossible, why do they not publish a decoder ring for the part numbers

no thrust bearing we use redrives, max rpm, depends on user hp needs, rotax 277 to 503 dcdi = 4,000, 5,000 rpm, max is 7500 rpm using carrier heads with carrier stock springs or 10,000 with beehive springs. but need different redrive ratio, small block big block different factories in georgia, big block is too heavy for part 103. max hp made by racers with the 23 is 90hp

ruclips.net/video/FFwCI2bZTfQ/видео.htmlsi=TLhL3FOHd17cUOKC

for my high hp ace aviation made a redrive for me, 1100 dollars, designed for 50 hp and uses a toothed belt to eliminate slippage. very lightweight.

ruclips.net/video/g-3CWN47ZdU/видео.htmlsi=3wqovd5irKMZhrD9

ruclips.net/video/EOl6iDufXOQ/видео.htmlsi=EDbvQUJu9ubWBo9Q

Finally got FreeCAD to spit out cubic inches of my aluminum mount/redrive, 3.82 lbs.

cool the way i got volume was to send it to a slicer for a 3d printer and it gave the cubic amount used and i multiplied it by the weight of a cc of aluminum

yes but they arent discussed because , 1- they are heavy 2- he doesnt have any 3- when he had them he didnt have bearings

their math in the 150 dollar program is a scaled down wave form, for 600 dollars you get it all and it designs the exhaust to spec

@@vg23air As a hard core Linux user that might be an issue. But it's capabilities seem very impressive. We'll see how it compares to the real world engine.

ruclips.net/video/42XlX5B8P24/видео.htmlsi=DwRz0n70om7NpQUI

ruclips.net/video/QqgbeWpR4U0/видео.htmlsi=LqM6LZ2nwgnTrh-T

Thats why prior to purchasing, we entered a dozen known engines cars motorcycles airplanes and lawn mowers, and it came out close to dead on. Then we coughed up the cash

the law is for those kept in Virginia. With that said said and knowing Virginia like I do re cars and taxes, make sure you have some documentation with you to stop them at ground zero, like maybe some pics of the hangar etc. I thought about keeping mine in West Va about 10 miles from here as well.

Or... check out the registration process for either USUA OR EAA and see if the registration for the plane will have an ADDRESS on it, then it would be REGISTERED and have an ADDRESS, EAA is the cheaper option. The issue is you will have an EAA address for you, but you want the plane address to be PA, you will have to check and see if that works on EAA paperwork. The EAA is free for members, the USUA charges on top of membership

i reported it live, cops were too slow, I then went to the magistrate, he refused to let me swear out a warrant, was too long ago now. At the time my only option was to have my attorney sworn in as a special prosecutor and charge him that way. I moved on and relied on karma.

we had a head on 5 days ago, the offender was air lifted, rumor has it, might have been this guy, crossed the line once too many times. (thats why this video was posted, it was done to place on fb where the accident is discussed locally). I installed dashcams because of this one guy.

@@vg23air get a rear cam too

you have to keep the quench at 0.050 - 0.650 for aluminum. rod length is limited by availability and it causes other issues (offset pin, piston slap, directional piston installation)

dynamic will always be substantially less than static. i can configure for 11:5 to 1 but the dynamic is less, originally, it was coming out at 11.5

​@@vg23airoh yeah, valves are still open some part of the compression stroke. Seems like volumetric efficiency would still play a role in the calculation, maybe it's small enough to be negligible

@@clytle374 VE does play, the DC changes through the rpm range, thats where tuned exhaust comes in (or boost)

@@clytle374 valve overlap and intake close point, more you have the lower the DC, except overlap also drives up DC when the exhaust is tuned for a specific rpm (takeoff)

ruclips.net/video/sizWlmkKWK0/видео.htmlsi=Jc-eNxUVGnwXUyl2

yeah, once you pointed it out i did it differently and see you cant just factor the differential

@@vg23air You can, but you have to subtract the 32 degree offset from the scale.

lol

I didnt estimate any power gains from the coatings, but dynosim6 did, and it estimates more if both sides are coated.

@@vg23air I mean your conversion from C to F

i dont see where the math is wrong at the end

@@vg23air Can weight the redrive mounting plate for me? Doing a weight analysis of my mount and redrive, everything else should be the same

@@clytle374 i used google :)

i cant see anything getting over cooled even in winter :)