Видео

How did you become stupid ?

Bart Ehrman is a blasphemer and of devil, Know Jesus in Full, He is God, Man From Heaven, God who Came In His Flesh and His Blood from heaven

Jesus is God, Man from heaven, God who came in His Flesh. As He got in to Mary, He Got out, and God died for us on the cross. God born a Son out of Himself before this world Psalm 110, All fullness of Father was in Him. Jesus walked in all of the Old Testament. All the prophets saw Him face to face. Jesus came from heaven in His Body and entered Mary. Jesus is Bread from heave and that Bread is His Body John 6:51, He is Man from heaven (His name is Man 1 Corinthians 15:40-50). His Flesh is not of this world Hebrews 9:11-13. If people will make Jesus to a carnal man, they will worship creature not a Creator Romans 1:16-25 and will be cursed Jeremiah 17:5

34:17

Whole time I'm watching this I'm hoping he doesn't have a heart attack! 😳 Don't get me wrong, great teaching! Agree! Amen! ❤️

Starting at 13:27

When did he explain why(or why not) the original Greek text of John says that Pilot handed over Jesus to the Jews to be crucified? He said he would get back to that toward the end. I don't think he did, and he certainly had the time.

Arius was and is correct which is what the disciples beleive. The pagan Roman church who never stop their pagan worship but rather adopted Christianity in name only. These Roman church is as old as babylon and is Mother and son idolatry worship. Nimrod, Semiramis and Tammuz. They worship Mary but is really Semiramis or in different cutlures, Ishtar, Astarte, Diana, and many more. The queen of heaven is what Ezekiel calls this godess.

Bart is a Catholic and Jesuit trained to deceive people, he is an Imp. Only the real truth can set you free.

You people were all deceived, the reason why you believe what he said is because you have already been deceived by Christianity. Christians are those that believe in the pagan name of Jesus Christ. The name Jesus was never the birth given name and was never used for salvation.

Well be because people wrote about it decades after the fact at best. And then they kept teaching it to you up to the days in your church. It isn't delusion as much as brainwashed. I mention this many times in my own vids. When you are told something as a child and educated about it continuously in your school followed by multiple days a week in your church---you believe it. This is what I ask the Christian (former Christian here). How much have you actually researched? And researching doesn't mean reading a book by one of your own and just agreeing with it because it matches your already programmed worldview. It means checking for legitimacy. All of us deconverts were once Christians. And we did the research and as I always tell my own people. If you do the research you won't be a Christian for very long. Cheers, DCF

Ehrman slaughter the guy

"300 years later"? read John 1:1

(Jesus) Theseus en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus The ship of Theseus, also known as Theseus' paradox, is a thought experiment that raises the question of whether an object that has had all of its components replaced remains fundamentally the same object. The paradox is most notably recorded by Plutarch in Life of Theseus from the late first century. ruclips.net/video/1UEp9Mh8XAo/видео.html www.google.com/search?client=opera-gx&q=captive+dacians&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#imgrc=mUnVRfElZS7ZBM

It’s not an easy thing to deconstruct. It’s a difficult process. I didn’t want to do it. But the Truth is the Truth. You can run from it. But it will always win out if you think critically.

The mere topic title makes no sense whatsoever. How can He "become" something He's been for eternity?

You have it backwards. GOD IS NOT LIMITED TO YOUR MIND. REMEMBER, GOD CREATED YOU, NOT THE OTHER WAY ROUND.

slave father bart

You know what I hate? Not knowing. Let me explain, the one female on the panel was talking about "modernity" and how written history in antiquity was done way different than it is today in modern times. Her point, historians have to keep that in mind when reading the gospels for example. So when the gospel of Mark talks about some miracle Jesus performed, it might not have happened word for word and exactly as it was written, because of how they wrote back then, etc..., Okay, cool, but how do you know that? How can people know that's exactly how it hppened? How do the writters want us to understand what they wrote? If you answer that question, did you talk to someone about it who lived 2000 years ago? How do we know? We don't know, right? We're all just making educated guesses; right?

The Gospels look like embellished legends growing more fantastic over time. Matthew and Luke copied Mark but they clearly embellish or alter the story and events. John tells entirely different stories as I will demonstrate below. Mark 1. Mark 1: 21-27 drives out impure spirit. 2. Mark 1: 28 - news spread over whole region of Galilee 3. Mark 1: 29-34 Jesus heals many 4. Mark 1: 40-42 Jesus heals man with leprosy 5. Mark 2: 1-12 Heals paralyzed man 6. Mark 3 Heals shriveled hand 7. Mark 4: 35-41 Jesus stills the storm 8. Mark 5 heals a demon possessed man 9/10. Mark 5: 21 raises dead girl and heals sick woman 11. Mark 6: 30 feeds five thousand 12. Mark 6: 45 walks on water 13. Mark 7: 31 heals deaf and mute man 14. Mark 8 Jesus feeds four thousand 15. Mark 8: 22 heals blind man 16. Mark 9 Transfiguration 17. Mark 9: 14 heals demon possessed boy 18. Mark 10: 52 heals blind man Bartimaeus 19. Mark 16 Resurrection, no appearance narrative. Matthew 1. Matthew 1 virgin birth 2. Matthew 4: 23-25 heals the sick, news spread all over Syria, not just Galilee as Mark says. 3. Matthew 5 sermon on the mount 4. Matthew 8 heals a man with leprosy 5. Matthew 8: 13 heals centurion's servant 6. Matthew 8: 14-16 heals many 7. Mt. 8: 23-27 calms the storm 8. Mt. 8: 28 restores TWO demon possessed men, not one as in Mark. 9. Mt. 9 heals paralyzed man 10/11. Mt. 9: 18-26 heals sick woman and raised dead girl 12. Mt. 9: 27-34 heals the blind and the mute 13. Mt. 12: 22 heals blind and mute man 14. Mt. 14: 14 healed sick 15. Mt. 14: 17-21 feeds five thousand 16. Mt. 14: 22-29 Both Jesus AND Peter walk on water 17. Mt. 15: 29-38 feeds four thousand 18. Mt. 17 Transfiguration 19. Mt. 17: 14-20 heals demon possessed boy 20. Mt. 20: 29-34 heals TWO blind men instead of just one (Bartimaeus) from Mark 10: 46-52. 21. Mt. 27: 51 earthquake 22. Mt. 27: 52-53 raising of holy people 23. Mt. 28: 2 violent earthquake 24. Mt. 28: 2 descending angel 25. Mt. 28: 8-10 Risen Jesus appears to the women 26. Mt. 28: 16-20 appearance to the disciples and commission. Some "doubt" v. 17. Luke/Acts 1. Luke 1 totally different virgin birth story from Matthew's. 2. Luke 4: 31-37 drives out impure spirit 3. Lk. 4: 38-44 heals many 4. Lk. 5: 12-15 heals man with leprosy 5. Lk. 5: 17-26 heals paralyzed man 6. Lk. 7: 1-10 heals centurion's servant 7. Lk. 7: 11-17 raises widow's son 8. Lk. 8: 22-25 calms the storm 9. Lk. 8: 26-39 heals demon possessed man 10/11. Lk. 8: 40-56 raises dead girl, heals sick woman 12. Lk. 9: 10-17 feeds five thousand 13. Lk. 9: 28-36 Transfiguration 14. Lk. 9: 37-43 heals demon possessed boy 15. Lk. 10: 1-12 Jesus sends out the 72 (or seventy as in the NRSV). 16. Lk. 11: 14-28 casts out demon, heals mute man 17. Lk. 13: 10-17 heals crippled woman 18. Lk. 17: 11-19 heals 10 men with leprosy 19. Lk. 18: 35-43 heals blind beggar 20. Lk. 24: 4 two angels instead of one as in Mark and Matthew. 21. Lk. 24: 5-8 Luke adds an additional angel at the tomb and alters what they say to remove the reference to a future appearance in Galilee - Mk. 16:6-7, Mt. 28: 5-7. 22. Lk. 24: 12 Peter runs to check tomb. Missing from Mark and Matthew. 23. Lk. 24: 13-30 appearances on the road to Emmaus 24. Lk. 24: 31 sudden disappearance 25. Lk. 24: 36 sudden appearance to the disciples in Jerusalem, not Galilee as Mark predicts and Matthew depicts. 26. Lk. 24: 39 Jesus invites the disciples to inspect his "flesh and bone" body to confirm he's "not a spirit." 27. Lk. 24: 40-43 Jesus eats fish so there is no doubt as in Matthew 28: 17. 28. Lk. 24: 50-53 - Ascension 29. Acts 1 appearances for forty whole days! Luke also contains the most parables (24), eighteen of which are unique to his Gospel. While John may not have _narrated_ the most extraordinary events, one can still make the case the gospel is still the most "developed" overall. What about the fact that there are so many amazing stories unique to his gospel which are not found in the synoptics? For instance, the highly sophisticated Hellenistic Logos Christology, the water to wine miracle, the raising of Lazarus, the high Christological statements, the unique/developed teaching of the Holy Spirit, Jesus teleporting through locked doors, the Doubting Thomas story, and the miraculous catch of 153 fish. So all that PLUS the two passages below is enough to show that John, being the last written, is still consistent with being the most developed overall. Your video does not actually address this evidence of development. These two verses from John support the development theory: John 20:30 _"Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not recorded in this book."_ John 21:25 _"Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written."_

Dale Martin is a Bible scholar of the New Testament who teaches at Yale, watch his course for free which is around 30 classes of the new testament, Also can watch Christine Hayes, Bible scholar of old testament at Yale also. Just U tube their names with Yale courses. So much knowledge from these two, who speak Greek and Hebrew.

Just a thought, but when Bart was talking about throughout history Rome was known to leave bodies on crosses as a sign to never cross Rome, for example. That is an interesting point that may be significant for historians. However, what I think is also interesting, is according to scripture Luke's gospel, "Then said Pilate to the chief priests and to the people, I find no fault in this man." Therefore, I think it's conceivable based on this that Pilate may have told some of the soldiers if the family wants the body let them have it. I don't know just a thought, but who the heck knows anyway except those there at the time.

8:25

Page 1129 soda bread = n a type of bread leavened with sodium bicarbonate combined with milk and cream of tartar.

What translation says "Today have I begotten you?" I have checked several. Not in Luke's gospel 3 21-23. Not in any gospel. I see it's in Hebrews 5-5. Ehrman better check his references before he speaks.

How can you be begotten by God unless at some time God begot you?

John 10:30 I and the Father are one. Bart: Is John 17:20-21 a prayer from Jesus (god) to his Father (God) that the apostles also will become 'gods' here? I am not asking on behalf of them alone, but also on behalf of those who will believe in Me through their message, that all of them may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I am in You. May they also be in Us, so that the world may believe that You sent Me.

Who was the female panelist? I appreciated her comments

Yeishu did NOT fulfill ANY of the Messianic prophecies 🙄🤦🏻‍♀️ Not even ONE ☝🏼 There is mayhem, globally, and there is no where in the HEBREW Bible, that the Messiah has to come back a SECOND time to fulfill the MISSION 🙄🙄🙄

Boomer! Thank you Dr. Putman for your time and efforts in instructing ministers of the gospel.

Devil is using bart now a days be careful.

Jesus is not God.

So its a degree majoring in telling lies to justify probable lies... interesting. My perspective is that the Bible is essentially true but does have human errors in interpretations and misprints during the many years into the history and message it details. Apologetics my foot

More on the same topic: ruclips.net/video/Nvf886Oi1eM/видео.html

Jesus the Christ didn't become God, he always was God.

Ridiculous. I cannot believe that I devoted 50 years of my life to this whole Bible/Jeebus thing.... it's logically embarrassing and in terms of "faith", even worse. What a total crock of Control that most of you are simply dyeing to slurp up. There is no Heaven/Hell (doubt it? PROVE IT!). No loving Creator would create his finest with a "sin nature", bound for eternal damnation. Well... not one that I would revere or follow.

"I am, that I am"

The first part of Prof. Ehrman's lecture can be elucidated with this diagram: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/Christology_Flowchart.PNG And there's also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christology

Aren't Christians technically Polytheist if they believe there is God the Father and God the Son?

No one knows wtf is going on. No one can explain 3 in 1!! Bible written by people and therefore it is Not word of God in 99.99%.Made up as we go along and revised as we go along. Spread by converting emperors. Liars and opportunists made up this very confusing story.

Who cares?

So ... essentially what Hurtado is saying, the Apostle Paul along with the other early Jewish Christians, held to a “high Christology”, that is, a high human resurrection Christology. “Same substance” or “essence” was not a part of their terminology, therefore, it’s not a factor in their views. If we want to have the same historic Christianity that they did, then it only stands to reason that we should eliminate post New Testament ideology from our views as well, and stop using them as the filter through which we understand the Apostolic writings.

The question is how the Word became flesh.

Jesus and Father were before Creation.Jesus is now and Kingdom Come ; God and man.

I'm god everybody! 😶

Jesus is God...HE became human in order to die tht His blood wd reconcile man unto Himself. As man Jesus remained God sim ultaneously. He humbled &restrained Himself tht he hd all temptations bt never sinnd &all power of God to heal & resurrect frm dead.

I think that Bart creamed Michael.

Bart doesn't believe in the Father so the testimony given in the OT has no impact on him. So how can he believe in the Son and the testimony about the Son? He seems to take joy in sowing doubt on the testimony of the Son of God but only the blind follow the blind.

The Jews preached that they were "the chosen few," and those who begged to disagree decided to start another new religion, with Jesus as their representative. It is, however, very suspicious, that much was written in the new testament about Jesus, yet not one word was ever found in the personal hand-writing of the one that was said to be a learned master, and the savior of humanity.

Very simple, "1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. 4 In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it." John 1:1-5. Pretty well sums it up. In the end, every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that he is King of Kings and Lord of Lords. That time is coming quickly.