Видео

@@NorwegianAce1 Thank you.

Should I uninstall?

@@plainkiller0136 For starters, hold J.

@@chris_bianchi13 lol

yeah these types of fighters definitively find themselves at a disadvantage in the scenario. Especially if its equal energy states with more manuverable planes

@andrenadeau4462 you bring up some great points. I'd love to try both I'll 2 and DCS but I don't have the equipment for them.

@@plainkiller0136 Yes, those games are demanding in term of equipment if you want to do well. I do not have direct experience but my friend built his own cockpit simulator with top of the line joystick, throttle quadrant and rudder pedals and uses a head-mounted display. That makes him OK equipped amongst the real enthusiasts. That is a big investment unfortunately.

@andrenadeau4462 maybe I should switch war thunder sim lol

@@thewildboy797 my personal favorite is the Pz IV F-2

@yuomonkey it's only an oooga booga dumbass take to the new players. I miss the old war thunder too. Although I admit props are a lot more balanced than back then. But still definitely some questionable aircraft.

I'm on the same boats. Some jets are fun but most are just mid in my opinion. Although if the ceiling doesnt get addressed it could result in the eventual downfall of the game. But then again something is beautiful because it lasts.

@@nouser935 nah pure luck ngl XD

@@plainkiller0136 all right tankiller0136

@@nouser935 lol

@@MeanHereAT yes I do. This video is about the 4B version at 5.7.

@@MeanHereAT it is a good plane. But i didn't have a good time. My playstyle and how games are played at this BR don't seem to mesh well at all.

@@plainkiller0136 How would you describe your play-style

@@MeanHereAT slow and methodical. I get to altitude about 4-5k meters. The importance of this varies depending on plane im flying. Then I work my way down the chain from highest enemy to lowest. I prefer boom and zoom and energy fighting. Dogfighting is usually a last resort or if I'm feeling frisky. But I'm no stranger to it either. I try to help teammates as best I can without breaking the "work your way down" rule as best I can.

@@plainkiller0136 yeah yeah, seems like the usual I might have to play with you at that tier since I haven't played US props in a year or two, the only fighters I fear that are at that relative tier are the Spit LF Mk.9, Yak-3U & I-225

@MeanHereAT Mainly me not getting along with the plane. I have a video planned to be out soon of me.showing the exact opposite of "U.S. main copiun." But this video was more than just about US planes not fitting the game. But I'm still new to this so I probably didn't articulate my point well enough.

@@plainkiller0136 Tell me all of the non-meta U.S. planes.

Do you mean bad American planes or ones that don't fit the meta?

@@plainkiller0136 What I'm basically asking is name a US prop fighter that you deem 'non meta'

@@MeanHereAT F4U-4 (comprared to a MkIX and a Yak3/9U it's good but not for inexperienced players), P-51D30 (requires alot of patience and abuse speed, means you need space and time) P-47 (P-51 without the initial climbrate) havent tested the F6F and the P-38 is pretty good so I'll count it as meta

Do you think those Russian bi-planes are overperfoming?

@regularkcereal that is the correct phrase. But the plane is a "Jack.of all trades" that's insanely good at climbing. Hence "Jack of All Trades. Master of One."

@chris_bianchi13 maybe they changed the 2005. It's been years since I've flown the thing.

Thank you.

@soranuttwilawan660 it's been a bit since I've flow a spaded mk 22 but I believe the main difference is the 150 octane. Possibly a different tune on the engine as well.

@@thewildboy797 thank you

@@soranuttwilawan660 thank you!

@ashkiller14 nah the heat death of the universe will happen befote this channel gets big

@plainkiller0136 Subscribing purely to prove you wrong. Also, out of curiosity what madd you feel the need to make a tutorial on take off in realistic instead of sim? Realistic is literally just hit the gas, pull up your gear.

@ashkiller14 because my previous squadron has a huge problem with their "pilots" crashing on take off in squadron battles. And I was supposed to be their trainer but then they bitched and moaned about it and ripped it from under my feet. I was really looking forward to it. So it's mainlcaa subtle call out to them that they suck.

@@orcadolphin4615 those are pretty valid points.

@orcadolphin4615 thank you! You can get it around the VE sales I believe. May 5th. Comes around every year or so. Sometimes more often.

@chris_bianchi13 thanks for the heads up. That makes total sense actually. I'll have to try it sometime.

@@JonathanLeaver thanks for the tip!

@sander5990 not as bad as some Russian jets though haha

@josephbubash1662 ill have to try it.

@soranuttwilawan660 yes they can definitely be a bit hand holdy at times

@soranuttwilawan660 thank you. I'm currently having to take a break due to a move. But im planning a seven video week for when everything settles

@@archimedesfromteamfortress2 haha great conclusion!

@@aesiftheelf are you complaining or liking it? I can't tell lol

@chris_bianchi13 it definitely is. Sometimes I feel it's a little under powered especially in a climb. But the air spawn more than makes up for it.

The people who made the A-36 wanted to make p51’s. And they couldn’t because they had fighters already and need ground attackers/dive bombers. The company that designed this p51 that’s capable of dive bombing so they could be funded because a ground attacker was needed, and everybody absolutely loved it

@MCBuilder106-n8t I'm glad you enjoys. Subscribe if you want to keep up with my content!

I used to only play arcade, but I have finally adjusted to air RB. Honestly, you just gotta play like 10 RB rounds and you'll get used to it.

@@Sweezster I've played a lot of air rb and I just recently sort of figured out how to lead.

@@roadbrewreview5190 That is perfectly okay. Why do you disagree?

@@plainkiller0136 Oh I haven't played in a few years but I played from 2014-2022 and I just think all of those planes are fine where they are at. Are there some situations where it feels like clubbing? Yes. Are there situations where they feel outmatched? Sure. But overall I remember playing the G56 at 5.0 or 5.3 or whatever it was. And the P51H was down their too. I think moving the planes around will upset more than it will help.

@roadbrewreview5190 yeah I definitely wouldn't put any of these aircraft as low as 5.0 or even 5.3. From my experience these planes either are too good where they sit. Or not good enough. La9 and G56 respectively. Both really seemed over tiered for what they are.

@@plainkiller0136 I'm also being cheeky. A BR rebalance opinion video is as old as the game itself. I am just glad you and many more are passionate about balancing the game!

@@roadbrewreview5190 we all want what's best for the game.

@@edxcal84 i managed to get this footage in only two games as well.

@@johnnymnemonic8487 i agree with you on all bit the last part. I personally think the 1b variant was fine at 6.3. As I expressed in my BR changes video.

@@plainkiller0136 I'm meaning because of the rudder problem I don't think it deserves a 6.3. I mean it's nice they give it such good guns but dammit if you can't dive on anybody. They would be great battle ratings if they made the rudders more fair. Russian planes even over 600 km an hour with their wings shaking apart and a tiny Rudder works better than America's planes. The other thing is how the controls work. With keyboard and mouse you'll notice American planes do not fly as good as the others. You have to use your keyboard much more with American planes in order to aim in general. So it's not really the plane that doesn't deserve the battle rating they just need to fix the obvious bias or bring down the battle rating if they're going to be biased about the planes. I mean what good is my plane that can dive faster than all the other planes but it can't aim when it's diving. It kind of defeats the purpose of the advantages in the plane if I have to slow down to my enemy speed or lower just to aim at him😅. If the bias wasn't there these planes should probably be 5.7 and 6.7 so I'm dropping them almost BR from their original ratings because you can't use them for what they were designed to be used for😅. I'm originally a tanker and I can attest they do the same thing to American and British tanks when it comes to blatant inaccuracies but what are you going to do it's still the best looking war game. Which is kind of sad when you think about it but then you get happy again because the game is free. Then you get killed by a premium and you're sad again🫠

@johnnymnemonic8487 I've been out dove by so many planes that shouldn't have been able to keep up as well. Such as zeros and spitfire. More horsepower plus more speed focused airframe doesn't equal greater dive speed appearantly.

@@plainkiller0136 you got that right.😆

This is the 5.0 variant with 4x50 cals not the 6.3 with 4x20mm.

@johnnymnemonic8487 the 6.3 variant doesn't have as strong of engine problems either.

@leon886 when I first got the plane many years ago it had a more accurate FM and had M3 50 Cals at 5.0

It's funny you mention that cause I pronounce ki-61 correctly but ki-43 or Ki-84 I don't. I think that's just how I learned the names and never put the two together.