Видео

@@RhodySeth that’s very poetic of you :) I actually know a very talented Astrophotographer that imagines his now passed away wife out there

@@creazie Yeah its not exakt, but more in the ball park size wise

@@pedzsan yes! I forgot to grade it 😂🙈 Bortle 9 is hard work but totally worth it! 😃 thanks for watching!

That's a solid setup! The 585MC is a good camera! I was thinking of 585 or 2600 and ended up with the latter :-) Thanks for watching!

@@irtezaali4122 We are pretty active on Astrophotography Sweden on Facebook :) Also, join SAAF! :) you’ll connect with plenty of us there as well!

@@tamenyc yeah the edge is pretty big 😅

@@Pigush_Piggy my semi portable observatory :)

@@robertgrenader858 that sounds like a great piece of equipment! Thanks for the tip, will definitely check it out!

@@GediAstro@GediAstro On second thought, you may need the larger power box from Pegasus to cover all your gear. Clear SKies!

@@refetastro thank you! I don’t understand though, what do you mean with the outside to look more like Ha?

@ at the edge red unread yellowing brown

@@refetastro I guess you have full freedom to edit the colors as you wish using the hue sliders in Photoshop (for instance). But you're gonna need existing signal to be able to manipulate that particular part of the sky! Other than that, you'll have the full freedom to create whatever palette you want!

@@fluke730 😅

@@michaeledmonds3027 Hello! If it’s narrowband filters we’re talking about, I would have gone for a Sii Oiii dual band filter, like the Altair 4nm one. And of course the L-Ultimate Ha Oiii 3nm filter. Thanks for watching!

@@thegunfamilyhomesteaders thank you! I appreciate that!

@@RhodySeth I’m in the 4-digit club! 😅

@@imaginalcala those are great filters! Remember that the HaOiii is 3nm whilst the SiiOiii is 6nm. I would extract the separate channels when stacking and then stack the two Oiii images into a single one, and then treat them as mono images 👌🏼

​@@GediAstro Thanks, but I´ll try with C color magic Askar. Do you know how can I separate the channels in s APP (Astro Pixel Processor)? Thanks a lot. I have been thinking, perhaps I have to stack lights OIII and S and after in PS separate the chanels asuming OIII is blue and green and S is Red?

@@imaginalcala yes at tab 0, select HaOiii - Extract Ha and HaOiii extract Oiii and then the same for SiiOiii. You’re gonna stack four times and then a fifth time for the two Oiii :)

@@GediAstro Muchas gracias. Thanks a lot.

@@GediAstro Hi, only a question, in tab O, in APP are Extract Ha from Ha OIII and Extract OIII from HaOII but I can´t see Extract SII or Extract OIII from SiiOiii.

@@asp5993 thank you! 🙏🏻

@@mansurk37 I’m glad you liked it! Thank you for those kind words, it means a lot!

Yeah that dark sky is something else dude! I actually managed to solve my battery issue, turns out it was a calibration error on the display and it showed the wrong charge remaining. The battery worked like a charm after showing "1 minute left" for hours! I later recharged it and it went back to good ol 8 hours of operation time remaining again. Phew! Thanks for watching!

@@0xALaLa thank you for the kind words! I’m glad you liked it! Pretty awesome stuff coming up :) stay tuned 😅

@@barnaclewatcher4060 you’re welcome, thanks for watching!

It's a fantastic setup, go for it! 🙂 I'd recommend mono all the way, but that's a lot due to the fact that I photograph from Bortle 9 and do mostly narrowband imaging. In theory, Mono is always better, but you need to remember what your needs are. I personally don't enjoy the fact that I need at least 2 hours of data collection just to get a color image (30 minutes of LRGB each). It's always a hustle when I do trips to dark locations and can feel stressed to get an image. Then a color camera would be better, because i'd have results directly from the first sub 🙂

Thank you! I'm glad you liked it and thanks for watching!

@@RhodySeth yeah it was great fun! I learned so much! And that battery man.. have to investigate it further

@@larrychristianson2244 indeed so. It’s amazing how quickly we loose contact with our place in the universe when living in a light polluted box :(

@@Excessus1978 happy to hear that, it means a lot! Thanks for watching!

@@robertminiewski9804 thank you! And thanks for watching :)

Thanks for watching!

🎉

Tack så mycket! Så kul att höra!!

You can come to Stockholm and stay here for a day or so and then we'll drive down together! :)

It was SO much fun seeing you there man! And all the things I learn from you is invaluable! Thank you for that!

Yes! I remember you dude! :-) Man, I wish I could have stayed the last night too.. It wasn't fun turning off the gear with 80% batteries left.. :D Hope to see you next year again! 🙂

It never happened :-) It was simply a slow video of data collection with my telescope. Tried a live session for the first time. Unfortunately nothing exciting will happen - other than an occasional UFO passing by :)

@@rd_0939 I do have some thoughts :) First of all, I think it’s great that you really think things over before purchasing! So the 72ED is a 420mm telescope, meaning it’s really not suitable for smaller galaxies like M104. But you’ll get good photos of larger ones, like Andromeda galaxy and the Triangulum Galaxy or ok photos of some of the medium sized ones, like M51 or M101. I agree with the ASI715 assessment of others, it’s a planetary camera made to take high speed videos of planets. So although it’s tempting to get one and “zoom in” even more, it’s just a digital zoom and won’t help you with getting better images. I’d go with a DSLR like you plan, and when you stack your images, drizzle by x1.5 and you can then crop that photo to get closer to the galaxy without loosing too much resolution! If you later on in your journey want to be serious about galaxy photography and getting the smaller ones up close, you’re gonna be looking at telescopes with more than 1000mm in focal length :) But for now, try the above and just let me know if you need further advice! I would also invest in a modified DSLR if I were you, that way you can also photograph beautiful nebulae within our own galaxy. 420mm is great for that!

Thanks a lot! I think I should give DSLR a try. Maybe that way I can image larger galaxies or nebulae, and also get some decent wide field images of smaller galaxies. Thanks again for the help. I'll definitely get a more professional setup in the future.

Filters are your best friend and a filter wheel is really good to have. I highly recommend it!

Oh Yeah! 🤩

@@larrychristianson2244 thank you! Yeah I really have optimized my gear for that! :) now all I need is a RASA.. and a second rig.. or also a third.. 🤪

Thank you!

@@Astro_Shed thank you, I appreciate that! And welcome!! 🎉

Yeah the jellyfish is nice :) I'm well above four nights of imaging to this date so far! I'm already finished with two projects!

Thanks man! I did get a few hours that season although this next one is already really getting better! :-)

@@mangojack1487 Yeah! 🤩

@@RhodySeth 😂😂😂🤩