Видео

Can you explain how God's word is made incarnate in Jesus Christ?

A biblically comprised soul, John is. He rejects the creation account in favor of the Big Bang. He even told Richard Dawkins on camera that he believes evolution as Darwin saw it. His anti biblical positions on such things keeps him in good standing in the lofty Ivy League places where the philosophies of this age are promoted. The god of this world uses men like Lennox. He undermines the foundations of the Christian faith in the minds of many while claiming to be its defender.

These conversations take on a different and much better tone (as with this one) when it is evident that the people involved are all devoted Christ-followers trying their best to wrestle with challenging issues instead of just trying to score intellectual points. Thanks, Science for the Church!

Has anyone questioned the age of the fossil records. I am specifically interested in subduction of the plates folding in on themselves over and over and burying the fossil records and then renewing them. They have used the half life of the nuclear sun to age the planet at 4 billion years old. Why can't it be a Trillion years old.? What if there was two suns and one left.?

Doctor Lennox sir, you bear a strong resemblance to Chubby Checker

More John Lennox Please!! ✌️

Always liked Lennox since learning about him. It's so true; many churches seem run in a fashion of "sit down, shut up and listen to what the pastor/bishop/etc has to say" instead of welcoming questions or willing to discuss more difficult topics. Part of the trouble, I think, is there're a lot of folks out there who are expectant of their church leaders to know everything, and in that expectation, I think said leaders shy from questions, especially more difficult ones, because then it bares witness to their not knowing everything. Any good head of a church is going to admit there are things they do not know, and when faced with questions that they aren't 100% sure of, they can always answer the questions with the disclaimer that that is what they believe or figure to be true, or that they honestly don't know, which can open up some later discussion about it. None of us can know everything there is to know, but sharing with one another and testing it against the Word is how we learn. I'm thankful to attend a small church where open discussion is a little easier.

Very interesting interview, I have great appreciation for Mr. Lennox, a true wise man

Is there any video anywhere of Lennox actually talking about mathematics? His status as a mathematician is touted relentlessly yet, to the best of my knowledge, there is not a single video of him talking about infinite soluble groups..... His apologetics would bore a hole in your head.....

Thank you John is a blessing, and so are you. Kind regards Kim

Tory and Trumper windbag.

Great conversation friends! Thank you for your work

Thank you for this brilliant interview. I’ve heard it before but loved coming across it again.

Why don't you say my name and stop war

He is a very very wise and brilliant man!!

Father God, i lift up disbelievers to You. May The Holy Spirit move in their hearts, to convict them of Your Truth. Their minds are too full of themselves and the so called intelligence of man and science, for You to find any room in their brains. Your Will be done as we approach Your DEADLINE! i Pray this in The Name of our Lord and Savior, Jesus our Christ, Amen.

So blessed to have that much brain power.🤯🤯

Bringing science to religion is a good thing, IF it is truly science without underlying religious assumptions. I've followed Dr. Lennox for some time listening to his justifications for his religious beliefs. Belief without evidence is fine as long as you acknowledge the lack of or weakness of the evidence. You believe the god of the Abrahamic religions exists, period. It is just a personal belief. It is when someone like Dr. Lennox tries to justify his belief in a god, call it God, that things go downhill. The same applies to Dr. Francis Collins and other scientists who believe in some kind of God-as-a-being. I my opinion, Lennox and his believing compatriots have zero evidence that God exists. Their given evidence is not evidence at all -- it is their spin on what they state as evidence. One hears, "I believe God created evolution and His hand guided it to produce humans who can commune and worship Him." That is a crazy belief without evidence, but okay as a personal belief. One has to wonder, why would an infinite, uncreated, all-powerful God of the entire universe need and want to commune with flawed human beings? Why would He need and want to be worshipped? No answer is forthcoming from the believers like Lennox. And look at evolution. If God created and guided evolution, He did a very poor job of it. There are all types of grotesque life forms that have evolved. I wonder if Lennox and Collins have seen babies born with no head and brain, born with part of a twin sticking out of them, born with all sorts of genetic malformations. This is God's work in their belief. It staggers the mind to think of how people of such intellect can be fooled so badly. But fooled they are. Many times, as in the case of Francis Collins, their belief stems from a so-called "religious experience." According to Collins, his experience occurred while he was hiking in the Cascade mountains. They sincerely believe that they have either seen God, felt God, and/or had such a profound experience that they are compelled to believe in God's existence, and in Lennox and Collins' case, the Christian God only. Did they consider that they most likely experienced a hypersensory episode? An experience where the sense of self dissipates and one perceives level of nature unseen in normal consciousness. Jane Goodall reported such an experience as have astronauts. This is an uncommon, but achievable brain/mind state. One can achieve this sort of subjective experience through meditation. Enough. They will have to figure it out for themselves.

For me, I use an analogy, from language. In Japan, they have two dictionaries. Japanese language is, by itself, is very rigid. And doesn’t grow easily. So, in order for the Japanese People to use and catalog the material that came to Japan from other countries, people, and the expanding nature of ideas; they now have two dictionaries. One contains the old and very basic dictionary of words of traditional Japanese. The other is what even the Japanese people call the Japanese Slang Dictionary; which includes all those new words and terms from other places. This is a rational, reasonable, and logical solution for the expanding nature of the Japanese place in the modern World. And I find it very mature. And so I come to my questions about atheist people in science. One has to ask why science can’t have two catalogs of terms: One which gives terms of nature that stands inside the vision and observations inside of science. A second catalog which dictates to scientists that which are paradoxical to the first catalog (including those things which include Christian ideas). The fact that this isn’t available inside the scientific community, dictates and outlines the childish nature of atheists in science. Science has retrenched away from the search from knowledge, in many cases. At that, stands as a tragedy.

Talking to the converted and misdirected. It is amazing that an intelligent person can be such a zealot. His belief in the nonsense he expounds is based on unproven events, miracles and resurrection of dead people. How can such a man seriously try to convince people into having to believe in fairy tales and unproven promises of life after death. It is his crime to give people false hope

Wish I could double-like this. Love these people and their openness to have this conversation

The point about not trusting a brain made by random and unguided processesat 17:00 is very appealing and I want it to be true. But I have a doubt and maybe you can help me. Our bodies were made over millions of years by trial and error. If a combination worked it survived, if not, it failed and that was it. Like the components of a basic cell for instance. The same could be the case for rationality. If a prototype brain was not producing rational thoughts it would not survive and a new prototype would emerge and if it was rational in its thoughts it would survive and continue on to the next model. For instance if a prototype brain said it was ok to walk off cliffs, that prototype would not continue. But one that did the opposite would do so and continue to maybe a better and more rational brain still. And so the process would continue. I hope you understand what I am trying to get at. I would be interested to hear from you.

Great thinker.

I like John Lennox a lot . I am always excited about science - learning is better than any high you can get from any cocaine or marijuana. Understanding that God’s creation is so sophisticated that it takes hundreds and thousands of specialities to to uncover how things work. I can see no conflict between God/ the Bible and science - how can people keep claiming this ? I guess they must have hardened their hearts .

Can never get enough of this gentleman.

Doing really wonderful job

Brilliant, very cool, thanks for sharing.

This was a wonderful interview -- the questions were great, the followups and the conversations in between. I learn so much from Dr. Lennox every time I listen to him. Thanks for the interview, please do another with him soon!

It's sooo refreshing to hear such a brilliant man in such a simple way and understandable way. He is my favorite scientist, philosopher, and apologist......blessings my dear sweet man in the Lord

Much love.

A homely trout talking nonse6.

the man you wish was your grandad😉

Throughly furnished unto all good works, our Bible promises about computers too. As an 81yr old corp programmer (non college) I find many computer principles in scripture. Boolean logic as in Google searches in Lev ll; database structure in Mark 8:19,20; Data mining in Mark 8:19,20 (leftovers); Password security Judges 12:6 and many more. For the old timers cross-foot summing is even demonstrated. When you really feed on scripture rather than just snacking you'll even learn that NOAH was a woman. (shhhhhhh there was two of them Num 27:1).

When is somebody going to have a conversation with John darling about all the money he's made from the God thing I'm sure darling John is a very honest man and very well in with God and he will leave all the millions to charity soon good man honest darling john

This is Certainly an Absolute Treat and Great interview. Thank you Guys and Professor Lennox for doing this, its Super Hard to find New Lectures and Interviews for the Professor, Keep up the Terrific Work. The interview was Well Structured with important Questions. It isn't everyday, God sends us Santa and Einstein All in One package. 🎁🙌 Amen.

Thank you for this awesome interview and subscribed!

Thank you for this video. Where I can watch the movie