Eric Sibla
Eric Sibla
  • Видео 2
  • Просмотров 57 011
Sidney Dekker - Resilience (Full Lecture)
Human factors and systems safety expert Dr. Sidney Dekker explains resilience.
-Source: www.lunduniversity.lu.se/
Sidney has gained worldwide acclaim for his groundbreaking work on human error and safety. He was previously at Lund University in Sweden as Professor where he founded the Leonardo da Vinci Laboratory for Complexity and Systems Thinking, as well as the MSc in Human Factors and System Safety. The program is still running, taking in practitioners from all over the world every year, and Sidney often finds the time to come to Sweden and teach a Learning Lab in the program. He has also been a Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, and Visiting Academic in the...
Просмотров: 18 597

Видео

Sidney Dekker - Just Culture (Full Lecture)Sidney Dekker - Just Culture (Full Lecture)
Sidney Dekker - Just Culture (Full Lecture)
Просмотров 38 тыс.11 лет назад
Human factors and systems safety expert Dr. Sidney Dekker explains "Just Culture". -Source: www.lunduniversity.lu.se/ Sidney has gained worldwide acclaim for his groundbreaking work on human error and safety. He was previously at Lund University in Sweden as Professor where he founded the Leonardo da Vinci Laboratory for Complexity and Systems Thinking, as well as the MSc in Human Factors and S...

Комментарии

  • @exwhyz33
    @exwhyz33 2 года назад

    fascinating lecture and very engaging presenter.

  • @Paulo_Gomes_
    @Paulo_Gomes_ 3 года назад

    Insightful lecture. By standing on his shoulders, we can see further.

  • @taavishi
    @taavishi 3 года назад

    Mesmerizing lecture

  • @canadiannuclearman
    @canadiannuclearman 4 года назад

    After seeing this you should see many video's and search for "The Red Bead Experiment" by Edward Demming. Demming was concerned about defects in products. He went to Japan after WW2 and had a dramatic impact on the quality of Japan's products. Now Japan's products are considerd top. But this was not the case in the 1950's. So Mr. Dekker has a safety culter almost identical to Demming's quality program. An organization that starts a safety program it should be headed by an industrial engineer that is totaly familiar with Demming and now Ishicawa. The next level in quality control is Six Sigma. So the terms can be switched in any good book on quality control by Demming and many others. If your reading a book on quality control interchang the word. If you see the word Quality sub it with Safety. If you see the word "defect" or "error" sub it with "accident" or "near miss". Then bingo you got a good safety program.

  • @ronaldraygun8708
    @ronaldraygun8708 6 лет назад

    This guy says that we shouldn't focus on drawing a line and telling people not to cross it? We shouldn't expect people to act a certain way? I call BS. Western Liberal (classical) values are worth dying for, let alone enforcing. If people don't want to tolerate freedom of speech, if people don't want to tolerate the right to self-defense, if people don't want to tolerate other's right to privacy, if people want to infringe on the rights of others (whether by raping, murdering, suppressing, assaulting, robbing, etc.) because they are shitty people (and yes shitty people exist), then they can go straight back to hell (from which they likely originally came). Post-modernism is a creeping cancer that will be the end of us all if we don't call out the sophistry and defend what is good and what is true. Otherwise, thousands of years of progress, physical and abstract, will fade away like it never even existed.

  • @samuelnjoroge8769
    @samuelnjoroge8769 6 лет назад

    nonsense

  • @erikadavies686
    @erikadavies686 6 лет назад

    This is clearly the same camera man who trashed the other video. Honestly, would a static view of the speaker be too much to ask?

  • @mickeypoos
    @mickeypoos 8 лет назад

    I'd really like to get a copy of this in writing. Great lecture

  • @PostcardsfromAlaska
    @PostcardsfromAlaska 9 лет назад

    Dekker assumes goodwill among the individuals of the organization. Experience reveals there are bad apples in all levels of organizations whose interest is all "self" and no "us". If a "Just" culture fails to allow the elimination of these turds, it will suffer.

    • @coachjason
      @coachjason 9 лет назад

      +Yann Galtski a system can sometimes be improved if certain individuals are removed from it, but for every truly 'bad apple' there far more 'misjudged people' who were trying to do the wrong thing and either misinterpreted the situation or what they were supposed to do in the situation. Behavior emerges from a system. No one is perfect and always 'does the right thing'. The goal is to create a system that encourages and makes clear behavior that will lead to success, discourages and makes clear the behavior that will lead to failure. As Dekker put it "how can we motivate the conscientious discharge of their responsibilities?"

    • @TheIphonedirector
      @TheIphonedirector 8 лет назад

      +Yann Galtski Goodwill is built on discretion to operate within limits in systems. These systems have conflicting goals and production pressures that tempt operating at maximums or minimums instead of operating at optimums balanced between extremes. Emergencies require operating at limits sometimes and put operations up against limits and shift risks higher. Some people faced with this level of conflict lose trust in the intentions of people involved and see "incidents" and extrapolate patterns of behavior and might belief they work with reckless people then feel trapped, and alone and behave in strange ways. There are actually people that realize emergencies excuse high risk behavior and operate in 911 mode all day every day all of the time. The experiences of these people being mixed in our collective experience make us jump from present actions to past experiences to beliefs and thoughts that isolate future behaviors from reality and distort intentions and accountabilities. This is the reality of the real world and these types of scenarios happen instantaneously all over. A resilient system sees the risk, or moral hazard of incidents of high risk behavior being seen as a pattern of behavior or actually becoming a pattern of behavior and act out accordingly. A bad system's bad apples are a good systems good apples many times with enlightened leadership.

  • @SyamsulArifinK3LH
    @SyamsulArifinK3LH 9 лет назад

    nice explanation about resilient organization