Видео

Well done, 47.

Luminiferous

First principle is the most correct and most ignored in law

Source?

HIs divine interest in the Heavenly Bodies made his supreme sensory system a formal realization to the sensibility of the arts and scielnces of Arete.

They didn't know then. We don't know now.

I remember taking this at colllege...I always remember the Republic so true today than ever!

The self of the early child does not developed as Lacan thinks. Primitive men did not have mirrors.

One delusion secures the other.

Ideas are present in the universe, and it's on human beings to discover them.

Continue 🎉

Good luck continue❤

🧭

Science is based on math, math is based on logic, logic is based on the concept of truth. So the physical material world is the surface level that springs from the non material that runs under it

Doesmt look anything like Habermas. Thats an insult.

Anyways

The social contract only constrains those for whom the cost of non-compliance is unaffordable

A contract presupposes a voluntary agreement of both sides. So at most you can talk about a contract between government and the majority that elected it, not the whole society.

Social contract An algorithm developed between two living systems. Living - intentful kinematics Algorithm - a series of steps with a VAR result This contract is beyond what this gentlemen even envisioned.

Could you possibly pronounce his farking name properly? Tree of stupidity.

do u even know what point u are trying to make?

I look at the world and judge it to be imperfect. It is impossible for me to be wrong, Think about it. That disposes of a perfect being creating a perfect world. Also, if there is a god of any sort, it's an IT. And that IT can't have anything in common with any other thing, if that IT is perfect-- if you define that IT as perfect being. Therefore, if that IT exists, it is forever invisible, unknowable, and irrelevant. IT might as well not exist.

A painter doesnt reside in his painting, but you can learn about the painter from studying the painting. This "God is in everything" idea, is a little off. I think people just like the sound of it

Hegel was very insightful

This wins the horsesh*t award of the year. The whole thing was a string of generalities so abstract as not to have assignable meaning. I couldn't even tell if you were supportive or detractive towards Habermas' overweight tome trying to establish the hocus-pocus tale of Jesus' resurrection. When is humanity going to reach the level of adult sophistication that rejects primitive magical claims from the get-go? Why don't Habermas and you take on the believability of the Gospels' claims of the graves opening up and the zombie hordes marching around Jerusalem during the crucifixion? That's equally a part of the whole troglodyte superstitious confabulation in the Gospels. What can be more ridiculous than guys with Ph.D.s spinning byzantine sophistry in support of narratives unworthy of subnormal 6th-graders? When you're over 60 years old and still unable to perceive the minimal requirements of intellectual dignity, it's time to pack it up, no matter how elaborate a vocabulary you're still able to wield. I know the definition of every word you used, and I'm an obsessional dabbler in analytic philosophy, but I have no idea what you were trying to say. And I'm not going to go back over it to try to figure it out, because my nose is too reliable to miss horsesh*t this aromatic. I'm just writing this to let you know that although your verbiage was successfully and deliberately opaque, its silly pretense and disingenuousness is utterly transparent to anyone with half a brain. You've made yourself so ridiculous that you ought to stay home until people forget about this little essay. Honest to God, this might be the most convoluted arabesque of nonsense I've ever heard in my life. You win the Jordan Peterson award for ostentatious and vacuous verbal display. Maybe you've gotten away with this kind of thing through a long professional career and still find it effective in bamboozling willing female undergraduate acolytes, but I'm here to tell you that your hubris has finally broken through the bottom of your philosophical vessel, and it's plunging into the abyss of comedic disaster. Take a good faith warning: nobody's going to try to deconstruct this stuff item by item. They're just going to laugh about it behind your back. Don't be fooled by their sober and respectful faces when they pass you in the hallways.

Perverse sex predator

I can give you an analogy regarding agnosticism. Why it is so unpopular as a philosophy, even if it is rather correct and irrefutable. Do you know in mathematics the concept of the smallest common multiplier? You have two natural numbers. What is the smallest natural number that can be divided by both? Well... If you formulate the problem like this, that number is always 0. If you give me a test formulated like that, I will always write 0 and I would be correct. I wouldn't even have to think about it. But where's the fun in that? The same happens when someone declares himself an agnostic. It ruins the fun for everyone else. Deep down inside I do consider myself an agnostic. And I do believe that to be correct. But if I keep pushing my views on the world, many times the argumentum ad batum gets shoved up my you know... :))))))))

When my mother and my father passed away, I saw reality.

Our reality is real.

No.

Well done!

This is intentionally misconstrued. It’s not either/or they are one and the same thing. If anybody wants to understand this, you gotta go to Aristotle, who was a student of Plato and was not refuting his masters works. We’re all Philistine’s until we wake up and see the Light- that is what matter is, that is what we are. Wisdom is in the light as Rudolf Steiner would say .

I'm not learned enough to fully comprehend this.

Wow, I hate this voice

like the anarchists marx wanted a stateless society which is impossible

Marxism is materialist, hence scientific, hence rational.

How can God be a man if he doesnt have a body ?

people.king theos logos . ! GOD . oneway .genesis olympio drama . N E W S .

overrated one

There is no such thing as "non-existence". Existence has always been and will always be. All it can do is change in an infinite number of ways but it cannot cease to be.

정말고맙습니다.

Heavier the content, lesser the input of the nerds and other matrix fans. lol

Do we enter a parallel universe when we take a dump?

Contradiction can not and do not exist. Evil exists. God is a contradiction of evil. Therefore, god cannot snd do not exist.

Smith Lisa Jackson Helen Thompson Joseph

Davis Dorothy Lewis Laura Gonzalez Elizabeth

This is interesting but it’s basically just Socrates trying to comfort himself before his execution by saying there will be eternal life or some kind of reincarnation. It’s interesting how a great philosopher will abandon their own logic when their life is about to end and personally I don’t see anything wrong with that if you’re going to die you might as well try to die as comfortably as possible.

Great vid

Clark Joseph Lopez Nancy Perez Eric

You’re all stuck in Ontology-Land. Things that exist ontological can be found, that what doesn’t exist ontologically, can be witnessed or understood. Like there might somewhere 506 stones in space that you can FIND with a looking through a telescope, in space. But you can’t FIND the 506 separated from the stone - like as if the 506 was a flying numeral in space. Because that would be a reification that would lead to a paradox. 506 is a verdict applied by your mind. You can understand how to apply the 506 to discern about the numeral value, which normal people call counting. But basically 506 doesn’t exist somewhere but you can apply it everywhere in space where the requirements are established and to whatever you want. If you would find in space a group of 506 Teletubbies - the 506 would not be found materially but understood, or witnessed to be applicable. So the source of all possible ways to reliably discern - a source we cannot pinpoint, but only apply what we received from it for our intellect, is the one deity. It’s a mind that is not physically existing - to be found somewhere, but to make perspectives on reality realisable to what ever creation project must be realized to let it realise perspectives on reality. This one deity you can call Reality. This Reality is the ultimate and absolute. It’s the source of every mutation ever realisable by mutation processes in evolution, and it is the source of every sophisticated idea the brain would be granted access to and express it. This reality as the source of all experiences we ever could have is named by the Hermeticist: The All, because it encompasses everything of what we think the universe or the world or existence is. Knowledge even though not physically touchable is still a phenomenon in our form of reality and so it is not denied to exist, but defined in another way than those the west taught the masses. Go to the Eastern philosophies and you will find a much more precise philosophical understanding of the nature of reality. Bye 👋