Видео

Thank you kindly , very well prepared 🙏

I love that illustration, "How do I honor a fountain? By drinking from it." God doesn't need anything from us but loves to give to us the needy. Great message!

Interesting story, the way I’ve looked at this story is that it’s an allegorie, that paints a picture of some one turning back from the true focus of out faith which should be the cross. For example Jeroboam was offering up incense on the alter at Bethel, he should have been offering up a sacrifice at Solomons temple in Judea, which in the old testament was a picture of the cross to come. The man of God was instructed to correct him, then leave by a different way, this shows in God we can only go forward in our faith, not turn back in any way, or turn to a different way. When the false prophet found the man of God, he was sitting under the oak tree, this is the position we should always be in, as the oak tree represents the cross, so we should live our life in the shadow of the cross, however the old prophet comes to the man of God and tells him to go back to his place. I see two problems here, one is he is going back to an old doctrine that does not anchor their faith in the cross, it could be a doctrine of works, and second one is he is eating and drinking from the old way of teaching before he learnt the “message of the cross” which is the terminology the apostle Paul called it in 1 Corinthians 1:10. To summarize, its simply going back to old teachings that do not teach the “message of the cross”.

Good video.

@5:50 were they really wrong in hindsight? Was Germany doing ANYTHING that the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union did not do? Forcibly Displace different ethnicity? check. Forced Work Camps? check. Censorship? check. Playing with the money supply? check. Extra Judicial Killings? check. Repudiating Foreign Debt? check. Unrestricted Naval Warfare? check. Purposeful Bombing of Civilians? check. Forced Starvation favoring one ethnic group over all others? check. Slavery? check. Colonialism? check. Conquest for resources? oh heck yes, check. YOU TELL ME, what exactly did Germany do that the others did not? The ONLY difference between Germany and the other great powers was access to oil.

Thank you for sharing Gods Word. ✝️❤️

🙄 Hmm is your "opinion" with regards the "right" God subjective or objective?? Can we ground morality in "any" God or just the particular one YOU determined is the "right" one out of the many thousands man has invented ?? If your answer is the latter then in actuality its *YOU* and YOUR SUBJECTIVE OPINION that is determining morality dear. if your answer is the former, then asserting objectivity to any moral claim based upon a "God" becomes a completely vacuous useless concept 👍 The claim that theistic morality is somehow "objective" is ridiculous. Theists are merely substituting their own subjective moral standards with the morals standards of the god they subjectively determine represents the "correct objective" morality. 🙄🤔

*11.20* Well my "conscience" tells me that *"Buy your slaves from the heathen nations that surround you"* Is not nor ever was a "moral" instruction and certainly not a moral reference standard that anyone should adhere or aspire to. Do you agree *YES or NO* ?? 🤔

*10.10* Is the killing of babies and children ALWAYS objectively immoral *YES or NO* ? 🤔 If killing babies and children is carried out or instructed by your subjective "God" is it moral *YES or NO* ? 🤔 If killing babies and children is carried out or instructed by a different subjective God is it moral *YES or NO* ?? 🤔 Is your OPINION regarding the "correct" God who's allegedly the basis for morality a "SUBJECTIVE" one or a "OBJECTIVE" one ?? 🙄 Let the mental gymnastics ensue......

*6.30* Humanity and society's as a whole can and do agree on a vast array of moral issues that have wellbeing and the values it incorporates at the heart. These are reflected in our laws murder "grape" theft ect are standard throughout societies (even secular ) For the most part, it's is only with respect to the concept of SIN ( percieved transgressions against the whims of subjective gods ) that the disagreement occur. Most people do NOT think it immoral for a female to uncover her hair in public or to not face a specific landmark and pray five times a day. Most people in the world are just fine with eating bacon, wearing clothing of mixed fabrics and even picking up sticks on any day of the week. We do NOT think that our unruly rebellious children who disobey their parents ( sounds like most teenagers to me ) are deserving of the death penalty and we recognise that an instruction to _"Buy your slaves from the heathen nations that surround you"_ could never represent guidance from a perfect omnibenevolent unifying moral standard. We do however all have commonly held values found the world over irrespective of which religion or NO religion. These value all conform with our ideas about human wellbeing. Im not speculating here or just giving you my "opinion" the above is all *FACT* regardless of the existence or non existence of ANY "God". Given this, should humanity adhere and aspire to the common values that unite us all and have real impacts on real people here in the real world. ? Alternatively should we continue on trying to impose the perceived whims of our own subjectively determined invisible "one true God" that divide humanity and have no positive impact on wellbeing that can't also be attained via secular morality ?? Come on surely we are better than this, the sooner the world throws out like old furniture these gods and their barbaric religious ideological baggage the better.

"Right and wrong" are words that are relative to the actualization of a desired goal or outcome, absent said goal, the terms right and wrong become meaningless. My "goal" is the actualization of a healthy flourishing coperative society based upon our common desires with respect to wellbeing and the values it incorporates, empathy, respect, equality, altruism, reciprocity. That is why one "ought" to treat another's as you would like to be treated, One "ought not steal if you wish to live in a society were property is not stolen. One "OUGHT" not murder if they want to live in a society were people are not murdered. This is our "reference point" or standard. One "should" or "ought" do something if Its conducive with the actualisation of a situation that conforms with one's goals and values. These "values" themselves are subjective by definition however it is entirely possible to make Objective declarations or decisions 'Within a pre-agreed framework of subjective values'. Values are socially approved desires that are internalised through the process of conditioning, learning or socialisation and that become subjective preferences, standards and aspirations a shared idea about how something is ranked in terms of desirability, worth or goodness *What is your "goal" and why 'OUGHT' one do what your subjective God desires* ?? 🙄🤔

Morality is the cognitive process of differentiating between human intentions, decisions, and actions that are appropriate from those inappropriate. The recognition and evaluation of the consequences our choices have with regards to ourselves and others. My NOT believing in a mythological god in no way impedes the ability of forming such moral assessments. We are self aware conscious pain and emotion feeling individuals capable of love or hate, incredible acts of altruism or depravity. It's how we navigate through life and these potential extremes that define us, not our belief ( or lack of ) in your specific subjective invisible god.

Thank you for sharing Gods Word. 😊✝️

"This cannot go to infinity because then there would be no First Mover" results in circularity. A First Mover is assumed to conclude that there is a First Mover which equates "God". You started well by using "moving" but robbed yourself of the opportunity to use modern physics by replacing it by "causing". Modern physics - especially quantum physics - is probabilistic. Phenomena like electron-positron pair production, the exact moment a specific radioactive atom decays and quantum tunnelling aren't caused. They can be described in terms of "moving" though. I don't know about Thomas of Aquino (it would highly surprise me though) but Aristoteles of Stagyra may have understood this. You should have mentioned that ToA took at least three of his five ways from this ancient Greek philosopher. Your explanation is quite lacking.

Interesting video. I was aware of the perfect island counter-argument, but didn't know Anselm responded to it in his time. Thank you for the analysis. Personally I still have some trouble with the reason Anselm uses here. Unless I am mistaken, it sounds like he was arguing that God is different from the perfect island due to some properties that God has and the island does not. But, is it not the purpose of his argument to establish the truth of His existence and which properties He has in the first place? It appears that Anselm's response relies on other proofs of the existence of God, which are then able to distinguish God from the perfect island, and then based on this distinction, his proof of the existence of God is valid... It seems circular. If we grant that the other arguments of the existence of God are correct, then what do we need this argument for? And vice versa, if someone is unconvinced by the other arguments in favour of God's existence, then will they not similarly doubt the premises on which this argument is based?

Thank you for sharing Gods Word. ✝️

Thank you for this. I recently got this Bible and you are right, it's a bit more intimidating than I expected. I do love that the readings are not dated. It really is a weird mental block when you fall behind on a dated Bible. It shouldn't be that way. But that seems to be how most people react. I can't wait to get into the Old Testament. But for now, what I decided to do was start the daily readings in the New Testament. I had already been reading through the OT in a regular Bible. I am in Nehemiah and don't want to interrupt that by starting over. My plan is, once I am done with the NT in this format and once I am done with my regular OT read through, then I will go back and start the readings from the beginning.

Because you don't have evidence? Also why are all the arguments broken and full of logical fallacies? :D

Good morning. I can see Pastor Pitt that you are very excited about this study and so am I. I pulled out all my chronological Bible study guides and books that I purchased a while back. This study will help all to understand and connect the whole picture of what God is teaching us. 😊✝️❤️

Good word!

Wonderful Word. Thank you, ✝️❤️

Good morning. Gods Word is so comforting. ✝️❤️

Yes, I’m waiting for His Return. ✝️🙏🏻❤️

So good to be in the Word this morning which gives comfort and wisdom. Forgiveness in Jesus Christ name, Trusting in God and Faith . ❤️✝️ This is what gets me through this earthly walk. I hope you have a blessed day Pastor Pitts.

Thank you for sharing Gods Word. I am so thankful for Gods mercy and our Savior Our Lord Jesus Christ. Thankful for Gods Holy Spirit that comforts and guides. Thankful for our Lord Jesus Christ Returning. 🙌🏻✝️🙏🏻❤️

Amen! Praise the Lord! Such a blessing.

Thank you Pastor for sharing God is in control and sharing the Word for Gods people, the Church in this day. Yes 🙌🏻🙏🏻✝️pray everyone pray. Ask for Gods guidance in Jesus Christ name Amen. Pray for Gods Will be done as Jesus Christ taught us. Pray for Gods Kingdom to come. 🙏🏻✝️❤️

Yes, Our Lord Jesus Christ, Our King, the Son of God is Coming back. I praise God my Heavenly Father 🙌🏻✝️.

We interpret Revelation 20 as a specific and limited binding. Satan is only bound so that he can’t deceive the nations from hearing the gospel. Other than that we believe he’s on the prowl and is able to cause all types of demonic activity. I hold this view loosely. I came from a dispensational pre-mil background and when I heard this explained by Sam Storms and others it made so much more sense to me. The other view that I like is historic pre-mil, I just don’t understand the animal sacrifices in the millennial reign as being Biblical. You did a good job representing this view. God Bless!! ❤️🙏🏻

I probably will never fully understand that passage, not in this life. But good point on the lesson. People will tell you God wants you to do this when you know God said to do that. Go with what you know He said, in His Word. But aside from that, im thinking God caused the prophet to lie to test the other prophet. Just like when He sent lieing spirits into the prophets of another king of israel to cause him to go into battle so he can be killed. I can never remember which king that was

Great Word. Praying for Gods Kingdom and Christs return. ✝️❤️

Another great Word. Yes, I say with tears in my eyes, man has forgotten God. Yes, man has forgotten man. I pray each day for Gods Will to be done. For Gods Holy Spirit to feel the earth. For our Lord Jesus Christ to come with Gods Kingdom. I pray for the whole world and lay the sorrows of the world at Gods feet. God is so Merciful and Our Lord Jesus Christ gives us peace. Thank you for sharing Gods Word. ✝️❤️🙏🏻

Yes, so much wisdom in your word today. Thank you for sharing. This will help those who live in these times. God and Jesus Christ loves us and will see us through. God and Jesus Christ is the solution to all things we face at this time. Sending love to the Church. ❤️✝️

Thank you for sharing Gods Word. How Great is our God. I Love His Word. I Love our Savior Jesus Christ. The Comforter of Gods Holy Spirit comforts me and Guides me. ✝️❤️

who knows if the 12 yokes represented the 12 tribes during a difficult period and the burning of one yoke represented the kingdom of Judea which was still following the true covenant and was free from the false Gods of the kingdom of Izrael? I believe that before Elisha met Elija God sent him a message of what was going to happen to him.

❤️✝️

Wonderful message of hope and celebration in times of trouble!!!

Thank you for sharing Gods Word. I Praised Our Mighty God and His Son Jesus Christ Our Savior. ❤️✝️

Thank you for sharing Gods Word. Yes, only Jesus Christ the Son of God. ✝️❤️Yes follow the Lord our King.

A Millennium Puzzle to solve… Will Christ be conducting funeral services for mortals killed in accidents 500 years after His Second Coming? The “first resurrection” in Rev. chapter 20 is not the first bodily resurrection in the Book of Revelation, because the two witnesses are resurrected from the dead in chapter 11. There are two different types of resurrection in John chapter 5. There is a spiritual resurrection from the dead in John 5:24, and a bodily resurrection from the dead in John 5:28-29. Does your view of the Millennium agree with what Paul said in 2 Thess. 1:7-10, when Paul said Christ returns in "flaming fire" taking vengeance on those who do not obey the Gospel? The fire comes at the end of Rev. chapter 20. Does your view agree with what Peter said in 2 Peter 3:10-13, when Peter said this earth is going to burn and "dissolve" when He comes as a thief on the day of the Lord? The fire comes at the end of Rev. chapter 20. Does your view agree with what Paul said in 2 Tim. 4:1, when Paul said both the living and the dead will be judged at His appearing? The time of the judgment of the dead, with reward for some and destruction for others is found in Rev. 11:18, right after the 7th trumpet, which is the last trumpet in the Bible. (This verse also proves the Book of Rev. is not in chronological order.) The judgment of the dead is also found at the end of Rev. chapter 20. Does your view agree with what Jesus said in Matt. 25:31-46, where He described the judgment of the sheep and goats, which leaves no mortals alive on the planet at the end of the passage? There are also no mortals left alive on the planet at the end of Rev. chapter 19. Does your view agree with Peter in 2 Pet. 2:4, and Jude in Jude 1:6, when they both said wicked angels are already in chains of darkness? Does your view agree with what John recorded in Rev. 9:1-2, when an angel comes down from heaven with a key to unlock the pit, which means the pit was locked before that time? Are there wicked angels already in the pit in Rev. 9:11? John recorded angels already "bound" in Rev. 9:14. The beast "ascends" out of the pit in Rev. chapter 11, which means the beast was in the pit before that time. Take all of the above and compare it to the symbolic language found in Rev. chapter 20, and the fact the Book of Revelation is not in chronological order, and you will have the truth. ====================================================================================================== Multiple Second Coming Visions in Revelation: (book not in chronological order ) Christ returns one time in the future. However, there are several different visions of His return shown from different perspectives in the Book of Revelation. Christ returns at the end of Revelation chapter 6, with signs in the sun, moon, and stars, as are found in the Olivet Discourse. Those at the end of the chapter are hiding from the wrath of the Lamb. Why would they be hiding if Christ is not present? The "kings", "captains", "might men", "free", and "bond" are also found in chapter 19 at the return of Christ. He returns at the 7th trumpet, which is the last trumpet in the Bible, and the time of the judgment of the dead in Revelation 11:15-18. The beginning of chapter 12 is a history lesson containing the fall of Satan, and the birth and death of Christ, who is the seed promised to crush the head of Satan in Genesis 3:15. The Second Coming is found in the "harvest" of chapter 14, which is related to the parable of the wheat and tares in Matthew chapter 13. He comes as a thief at Armageddon, and we find the greatest earthquake in history in chapter 16. This occurs when the 7th angel pours out his vial. How powerful is an earthquake which moves islands and destroys the mountains? What is happening to the planet? He comes on a horse in chapter 19. Chapter 20? Does He come with the fire, and the judgment of the dead at the end of chapter 20, which agrees with what Paul said in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10, and 2 Timothy 4:1? (The time of the judgment of the dead is also found in Revelation 11:18.) There are no mortals left alive on the planet at the end of Matthew 25:31-46. Why does an angel come down from heaven with a key to unlock the bottomless pit in Revelation 9:1-2, if the pit was not already locked before that time? Are there wicked angels in the pit in Rev. 9:11? If the beast "ascends" from the pit in Rev. chapter 11, where was the beast before that time? Does your view agree with Peter in 2 Pet. 2:4, and Jude in Jude 1:6, when they both said wicked angels are already in chains of darkness? Revelation 9:14 proves some of the angels were previously bound in some manner. Because the two witnesses were bodily resurrected from the dead in Revelation 11, the "first resurrection" at the beginning of Revelation 20 is not the first bodily resurrection in the book. The principle of "Recapitulation" means there are multiple visions of His return.

Thanks!

Powerful

Womderful Word. ✝️❤️

Great Word of God. ❤️✝️🙌🏻 I love reading and hearing the Strength of our God.

Thank you for sharing Gods Word. ❤️✝️

Praise God for all he resurrected in my life and all the more he will resurrect in my life! I bind one to know Christ in suffering and resurrecting from death while binding to hell every lack of sharing in Christ his suffering and resurrection from death, binding to hell being unequally yoked and having any common share with those not knowing Christ in suffering and resurrecting from death, in accordance with this word and philippians 3:10-11, 2 corinthians 6:14-18 in the name and blood of Jesus Christ, amen and hallelujah! ❤

Excellent

You mentioned how Solomon soent much longer building his palace then God's temple. Then there's all the fine detail of how he did it, he actually recorded how his palace was built. For me, this was the onset of the plunge into narcissistic indulgence that would lead to his downfall, even Solomon in his wisdom succumbed. Plenty of food for thought there.

Thank you

Enjoyed listening to your sermon.