Видео

Me gusta el pac_man

❤‍🔥❤‍🔥❤

concerning moral arguments against god! moral arguments lack one consideration: abolish death and then reconsider. Now it is not clear what i mean, so i offer the following choice, which you can repeat as often as you want. a) this room can never be exited. b) this room expells you 100% every time you enter, so its the only type which grants you another choice. In which room are you and which room would you choose? Does an a) type room even exist? What type of room does religion favour to advertise? We see in a b) type room that suffering is just that which expells you even against your will, in light of human will being capable to wish the abolishing of death. And that is the deep implication in moral judgements.

concerning contradictions in the bible: We don't need to discuss the content, when we see how christianity is split over the interpretation over and over. The bible is not a document of unity but of disunity, and rather shows the human condition. So the idea of a god through history is a vanity project. But then what are you left with, than sponations human projections or physicist trying to bring the principles to as little components as possible. (which frankly just is another aspect of reduction of complexity as monotheism)

Many theists are under the impression that all atheist cling to science and science is what leads people to atheism and that may be true for many but I am an atheist because god based claims fail to meet it's own burden of proof independent of science. Theist attack science with the misunderstanding that it somehow adds credence to their god claim if they can somehow debunk scientific theory. Religion should be able to stand on it's on merritt. Just as science has reliable methods of analyzing a physical universe and deriving useful data so to should religion have it's own reliable method of analyzing the metaphysical or spiritual in which they have not even made it to ground zero in first establishing the existence of anything beyond a physical universe and that's why I am an atheist. What science can or cannot explain should not have anything to do with god or supernatural claims. Science is in no way preventing theists from providing non-subjective evidence if they had it.. Theist always talk about atheist requiring evidence and if theists were honest with themselves they would realize they are in need of more compelling evidence for the existence of god even more than atheist because not having it causing them to jump through hoops trying to either reconcile their god with any new discovery about our planet/reality or try to deny and discredit the information, they are always on the attack with anything that does not validate their religious worldview,, they constantly battle with doubt and trying to convince themselves through trying to convince others, with some theist going so far as to try and make their religious views the law of the land. They call logic doubt, and self deception faith and they must always get their weekly fill of it through church or sermon.. None of this would be necessary if they had the standard of evidence atheist require while so many of them hold resentment towards atheists for requiring it and see us as the embodiment of their own doubt in the existence of their god which compels them to convert or condescend if the first fails. If they had it they had compelling enough evidence they would not sweat anything science has to say. Theists should stop trying to reconcile their religion with science because it only makes them look weaker in their convictions and instead reconcile the faith with the actual god they claim exists and if they cannot do that then they have no reasonable justification for concluding the existence of a god and I have no rational justification for believing a god exists. If the Universe was created by a metaphysical being then I would expect to find ethereal qualities in what we come discover about the Universe but it always wind up having physical qualities. Theist keep insisting that the origin of life was caused by Universal intelligence even while they witnessed throughout their whole lives physical processes bringing forth life with nothing just spontaneously coming into existence involving no physical processes. If we are witnessing physical causes bringing forth life now then why is it so hard for them to fathom the Universe starting from a physical cause

😴 "promosm"

It’s 2023 now

Un

Was Pac-Man popular in 2013

😍 ｐｒｏｍｏｓｍ

It’s my son’s birthday today and he loved this happy birthday, James video!

Wonderful.

😉

Fantastic! I'm also a James and my brother sent this link for my b'day! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣