Видео

Me parece poco serio su video hablando de la calidad de las imagenes donde muestra buenas tomas de Eidon y muy malas tomas de Optos. Seria mas profesional y objetivo si las dos imagenes fuesen buenas o mostrara la calidad de la imagen de dos fotos malas. I find his video not very serious when talking about the quality of the images where he shows good shots of Eidon and very bad shots of Optos. It would be more professional and objective if both images were good or if it showed the image quality of two bad photos.

Hi thx for very god reveiw BUUUUUUT what is the price and what value are you talking about :-)

Was looking forward to your next video. Devices are naturally a bit more exciting but good software is just as important. Hopefully I can get my hands on your cornea atlas I saw at EURETINA soon

Heavy and cumbersome, an overloaded of functions that take too much time to process for a busy practice (even with decently high spec PC), image quality drops dramatically even with modest lens opacity, never mind with pts with unstable fixation, scarcely customisable scan during acquisition. I can use whatever available that does the job but this machine is definitely not my preferred one.

With newly purchased Topcon Triton, ImageNet6 is also used for creating reports and acquiring OCT, no more duality of software.

Is it better to go for A Topcon maestro 2 with OCTA plus eidon fa OR a Triton PLUS. If both alternatives cost the same.

Eidon fa with Topcon maestro octa is a bit more expensive than Topcon triton PLUS. What would you recommend. Get the combo or only triton plus?

Cornea 30% of power. Total power = 60 diopters.

5:00 Cornea

2:00 Length of eye measure.

Incredible. I hope this instrument helps me go from 20/50 to 20/20. Eye total power = 60 diopters.

If possible pls make a video on analysis of abberation map of the pentacam

Does axl wave display lenticular abberation value seperately from corneal abberation

Thank you for this very comprehensive review! I am right now thinking about what perimeter to get and since I have a Revo FC 130 this is one of the candidates. Might I ask you some questions: in results presentation is it possible to get a colour map similar to octopus? Or get a progression graph showing MD over time? Also what exactly does it mean that MD and PSD are not adjusted to the normal population? You mentioned again that this device in combination with Revo is good for glaucoma specialists. Did you not find that the pRNFL measurements do tend to have significant variability even measuring the same eye multiple times in a row? Also I personally miss the Tomogram which corresponds to the pRNFL (TSNIT) thickness plot to check the segmentation. Again thank you very much for this great review. Did you think about doing a follow up video to show some examples of glaucoma eyes and how one could detect and follow up glaucoma with the different tests and plots? Kind regards

The optos Nikon machine burnt my eyes it's taken a month to some what come back to normal.

Great review!!!

ruclips.net/video/v6IzjQOvU8s/видео.htmlsi=hx7tdkP7dDLPtF-G

Excellent and very comprehensive review. Did you ever compare the Revo 130 FC Tomography with the Pentacam? Of course it can not be as good but can one detect a straight forward keratoconud with the Revo?

very useful

Please keep doing this

It really depends on your needs. Cirrus 6000 is newer, smaller, has better OCTA and it's slightly faster, higher resolution Oct that has some basic corneal analysis without the lens but the patient positioning is harder due to two chinrests and has no fundus camera. Also if you don't buy Zeiss Forum the progression analysis is limited. Triton is still nice OCT with ability to add Fluorescein Angiography, but is larger compared to cirrus. Honestly both are capable devices.

Which one u think is better.this or cirius 600?

thank you

Thank you very much for the nice informative review..is the pc all in one screen touch or not

How much is the Eidon?

Dear colleague, I want to express my deep gratitude for your invaluable contribution to the medical community. Your commitment to sharing in-depth reviews of medical devices on RUclips is an invaluable resource for us healthcare professionals. Thanks to your videos, we can make more informed decisions when it comes to selecting the best tools for our practices. Your ability to highlight the qualities and drawbacks of each device is extremely instructive and helps us provide higher quality care to our patients. Your work in knowledge sharing is truly inspirational, and I strongly encourage you to continue your excellent work. You have a positive impact on our medical community, and I genuinely thank you for it. With all my respect

Are you able to capture OCTs with the wide field lens in place? This is one drawback of the Heidelberg Spectralis - OCT is only possible with the 55 degree (and less) lens, not with their wide field lens.

Sir could review Xephilio OCT-S1 ?

Very good review! Thanks for sharing!

Very clear and crisp review. Thank you Dr Adam 😊

Thank you for creating this video! Great work! 👀

Thank you so much for your excellent videos. I really enjoy them as they're informative and helpful for new doctors.

I really appreciate your in-depth review of this device! This was very helpful and seeing the less obvious things like the ports and interface was great.

Really amazing video! I wish to see your next one about posterior segment as soon as possible!

Nice presentation, well done!