Видео

This guy sounds like a very narrow minded person who is all to willing to change actual figures to suit fighting for an excuse for governments to steal more taxes to fight 'climate change' and all the while knowing that climate works in a cycle. When the earth starts cooling these cultist climate change people will say see what we did has changed the climate. The rest of us will be saying nature has taken its course and is in its cooling cycle.

Caused by man, yes it coincides with population growth . The advancement of science interfering with nature.

1 argues with facts, the other argues with maybes, perhaps, could be. Who would you trust?

Polar bear population is stable. Mass of the great barrier reef is at a 35 year high. The numbers of hurricanes, floods, fires etc. are not trending up. The world is greening, not desertifying. The empirical data prove the climate models wrong over and over. MODELS ARE NOT DATA.

How does this program compare to the Gies iMBA?

CLIMATE NARRATIVE:ASK? 1)THEY HAVE TO BASE IT ON A STANDARD? MEANNING A FIXED POINT? PROBLEM CLIMATE IS NOT A FIXED POINT! IT VARIES IN CYCLES! LITTLE CYCLES IN A LOT BIGGER CYCLE! 2)DATA TO PROVE (CLIMATE CHANGE)? NO FIX POINT THAT IS PERFECT! MORE VARIOUS POINTS WITHIN A (NORMAL CYCLE) THAT THE ANSWER VARIES ALL THE TIME? YOU HAVE (CATOSTROHPIC EVENTS)? YOU CANNOT PREDICT? THEY (DRASTICALLY CHANGE THE CLIMATE)? THEIR ARE MILLIONS OF VARABLES AND REASONS FOR (CLIMATE CHANGE)? CAN YOU PUT THE MILLIONS OF VARABLES IN YOUR MODEL! CAN YOU? CAN YOU PREDICT (CLIMATE CHANGE WITHOUT DOING THIS)? THESE VARABLES INTERACT (INFINATE WAYS)? CAN A SUPER COMPUTER? WITH (CORRECT DATA AND ALL THE DATA)? EVEN COMPUTE THIS??? YOU CANNOT PREDICT (CATOSTHROPHIC AND MANY OF THESES VARABLES OCCURRING)? TIME IT OCCURS? NOR PLACE? AND INTERACTIONS (INFINATE)? THE OUTCOME? NOW YOU PUT THIS TOGATHER? CAN YOU? CORRECTlLY PREDICT THIS? AT SOME POINT OF TIME? IT WILL HAPPEN? SOMETIME! DO WHEATHERMEN PREDICT (WEATHER) CORRECTLY? THATS 2000000000 % TIMES EASIER! SO WHY DO YOU? TRY TO CORRECTLY PREDICT IT AT ACERTAIN POINT IN TIME AND PLACE? BAD DATA IN? WILL CAUSE A CORRECT THEORY? TO PRODUCE A VERY WRONG OUTCOME? THE THEORY OR PRIMIUS IS CORRECT! BUT NOT WHEN MOR WERE!

09:18. Using the Pinocchio story to warn children against lying doesn't make the STORY true, even if it WOULD 'scare' children away from lying. It's better to appeal to their conscience, and teach them a sense of 'foresight'. You'll keep your own credibility, they will trust you more, because you just told them the truth.

Why, whenever we watch something on RUclips, does that lie appear as the UN definition of climate change? The second sentence is unproven. It is not known, whether or if so to what extent, anthropogenic influence contributed. Michael Mann's "hockey stick" graph adopted by IPCC has been manipulated by omitting data past 1960, which if included provides a different graph which leads to very different conclusions. The UN use IPCC reports, and this graph specifically, to push its alarmism even though they know the graph has been manipulated to provide the answer they want and the IPCC reports claim there is no evidence of an imminent crisis.

The Hypnotism Motto: Tell a lie long enough till they believe it, then even when they hear the truth, they still go on believing the lie. Such is Pollution Climate Change. TIME HAS SPEED UP.

I love how he describes the climate gate emails as having been “stolen“. Those emails showed actual manipulation of climate data to support the alarmist sky is falling case. That is science fraud. And he’s doing the “chaff and redirect“ technique of describing them as “stolen“ And then the fact that he tries to make some comparison to Hillary‘s hacked emails in Russia gate, which also laid bare horrifying corruption between the Democrats and the USDOJ and FBI. That was not Republicans who “hacked Hillary’s emails”. It was Iran, China, and possibly Russia, although that is not certain. And Julian Massage of wiki Leaks. Julian Assange was a far left guy. He was not trying to help Republicans, he just couldn’t stomach, the corruption on the left anymore. So Michael man doesn’t even realize the irony of his comparison. He’s comparing climate alarmist corruption to democrat corruption and hijacking the criminal justice system to weapon against their political opponents. It’s actually a good comparison, but not for the reason he thinks.

The irony knows no bounds - Michael Mann describes the “weaponization” of “global warming”. He is the weaponizer. A forced consensus isn’t science. Well-respected dissenters were cancelled and falsely labeled as “discredited”. Michael man should listen to his own stupid argument. He says both sides agreed on a lot of environmental issues. Which is absolutely true. They agreed to limit CFC‘s to address the ozone hole. Agreed on many toxic chemicals and super fun sites. The fact that Richard Nixon (a Republican) created the EPA. Both sides agreed on the need for scrubbers on coal powered plants to prevent acid rain from causing deforestation. But the one area where there’s this false forced consensus is climate change, and what to do about it. There are many people of good faith who don’t think it’s right to turn our economy upside down to shave 2/10 of 1° a century from now. It’s technological innovation that will get us out of this not fascism “climate scientist“ who are skeptical or descent from the carbon, forcing model couldn’t get the research funded anymore. The only research that we get funded is the research that blamed and overhyped the role of carbon dioxide. Just like most people were OK with vaccines until we smelled a rat with the mRNA Covid vax. Anyone with a brain - anyone who isn’t brainwashed - can see the same corruption in “climate science”.

The Mann is one of the main reasons the AGW crowd has insurmountable PR problems with the worst reputation and track record in science. Climate change is real, AGW is not. Fifty years of failed predictions and trillion of dollars wasted on utter nonsense says it all.

some say 1.5 deg IS dangerous and destructive! why would we take any chances which could push us past any chance of slowing climate change down! and don't forget the 6th Great Extinction which may be an even worse threat!! and thus its not only climate change that is the issue- its over consumption and severe degredation of nature! its stupid to allow the poor countries to develope using fossil fuels since they will create an economy, cities, lifestyles that depend upon it- this is what the usa did and now we have to change and most people are Protesting/Risisting whats needed for that expensive change !!!!!

Nice to see that censorship is losing ground as more competing platforms that offer more real debate are coming online and the narrative can no longer be controlled.

You missed wgu

Steve Keen is a voodoo economist. A goverment can lend money with no limit. Why. Because Steve claims that banks will buy all the bonds that are issued. The debt of goverment is no problem. And the interest to pay for all the debt. Also no poblem. This can go on for ever. Well. We will see.

Smoke and mirrors. Voodoo economics - George Bush 41

the problem is thinking change is a bad thing. there are beaver dams seen from space. stop thinking you need to preserve everything the same

at least 70years of crisis-prophets totally failed. And they just double down. And all the media likewise. Total nonsense. And people, like the interviewer , are mixing pullution with "climate". besides; Paris and CO2: no effect whatsoever. Only effect is the BigMoney invested in this nonsense.

Do you honestly believe that data funded by (and for) government is truthful? Compared to what? No one funds reality. Discussion is nonsensical.

He was challenged in court. Why dont you talk about that? We all know what happened.😅

Love the support for Yeshiva but that’s just not true.

3 years ago, disasters were not as frequent. So it's time to update your claims.

It is wonderful to see Kleiman, a man who is deeply influencing my PhD work

PLEASE REMOVE THIS STUPID MUSIC!!

Al Gore's (US vise president 1992-20) successful war on science and scientists maybe coming to an end. This video has the United Nation’s Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially reported at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There has been no climate change due to global warming. Global warming at 1.5°C was predicted to begin climate change with stronger observable hurricanes in the Gulf-of-Mexico. The cause of global warming is not know in 2024. It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. Before Al Gore became US vise president in 1992 earth's water vapor saturated greenhouse effect was taught in US public education. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's water vapor saturated greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface adding 5.55°C (10°F) to earth’s average temperature. Its further heat transfer is by convection i.e. gas molecules bumping into to each other. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over a 99% share of earth's water vapor saturated greenhouse effect is from water vapor. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. The warmer Arctic Ocean water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice surface cover resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. C3 plants evolved over 100 million years ago when atmospheric CO2 levels were ten times those of today determined by plant fossils. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for. There has been no credible Climate Change due to global warming as of 2024. Climate Change was expected to start to take place when global warming reached 1.5°C causing observable stronger hurricanes in the Gulf-of-Mexico. The term Climate Change started being used at the beginning of the 1980s to cause alert to a broad audience of the long term effects of increasing average global temperatures. The promotional term Climate Change in the early 1980s was grounded on actions already taken by Gulf-of-Mexico offshore crude oil drilling companies in the 1970s to build for stronger hurricanes due to warmer Gulf waters predicted to start when average global temperatures increased 1.5°C on track for 2010. That action was taken for a predicted long term change in weather patterns or climate that backed up the use of the term Climate Change.

Remember we're in an Ice Epoch, and probably recovering from the Little Ice Age. Man-made warming is, as someone famously said, a fart in the wind. When I was at school, global cooling was all the rage. It's all about control politics, not about the Earth.

It seems a bit weird to say that 1.5 degrees is a "gradual" rise in one century. In the last few years it has also speeded up. Historically, this is a rapid rise, according to those who study theses things, and if it gets to 2-3 degrees - as seems very likely - it WILL be dire, like the predictions.

Imagination having a doctorate and still being dumb. Quit taking it to gender and race. The presidential race had nothing to do with either. Kamala made the BIGGEST MISTAKE EVER. Just a day before election, she told everyone at her rally that the Jesus rally was small and down the street. She basically said she's better than Jesus. Lol. That's why she lost ultimately

None of this panned out. No depression.

Should be listed as 9 African-American fraternities and sororities. #7 & #8 are incorrect, and should be removed. Missing are Delta Sigma Theta and Zeta Phi Beta. Thank you.

Christy's data has been corrected by others numerous times over the years. The most egregious is when he failed to account for satellite drift. He has also errantly included stratospheric temperature for tropospheric temperature. This is why you always want to have rebuttals as part of any teaching video. SkepticalScience skewers his views on their site. See CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: JOHN CHRISTY

MMT is the system we have and fiat systems have been around for thousands of years. So it shouldn't be called Modern --- it isn't a theory either it a type of monetary system. The real dirty secret is 85% of fiat money created is made by commercial banks when they create a private loan. So, banks create US Dollars that they don't have and they charge the private sector interest. It is disgusting and this is why we get asset inflation.

MMT is Socialism in new clothing. It's not modern, has it's own disgusting definition of money, and it's not a theory. Orwellian double-speak. Freedom = Slavery. Debt = Wealth.

n

Those aren't small

He always searches for the truth, I wonder if journalists would have accepted him.

Keen doesn't know he facts about the deficits of WW2. There was no boomed economy in WW2 in the U.S.A. because the production was increased produce war materials instead of domestic goods and services despite the fact that there was big increase in the workforce with a larger percentage than ever before of women entering the workforce. Despite this there were shortages of all sots of goods and services. The traditional measurements of inflation were masked by price controls on consumer goods and others. That war production was priced in dollars that had been depreciated in purchasing power through increased federal government deficit spending and borrowing for the war. There were price controls known widely as "General Max' imposed during WW2 and the removal of them after WW2 allowed prices to rise by over18% due to pent up demand and a return to normality where companies could switch back to producing much needed homes, motor vehicles, refrigerators and household goods. During WW2 the population had seen lowered wealth due to still paying higher taxes but experiencing lower levels of government services because of the diversion of a large percentage of the government spending into producing goods for the armed services.

what a wonderful woman, a bright mind

I went to grad school at Penn around the same time. My experience was nothing like his.

Damn in Ohio...

The whole global warming issue ignores solar variability, true historical temperature data, the work of Stephen Boltsman, and many others.

What about the manipulaion of the tax code that has permitted vast cumlation of wealth while paying very low tax rates. This coupled with the manipulation of stock prices to again benefit stock holders rather than attending to the technical needs. (Boeing might be an example) This is a death sentence for a company but, given time, the same could be said for a nation. One other feature that bothers me is the inclusion of government spending in GDP numbers. Government pending like the stock market does not reflect the real economy. Ultimately, the growth in money supply should not exceed the growth in the real economy. Excess capital supply too often gets fritered away on none prductive projects and staffing. Example Trudau's increasimg federal employee counts by 50%. THis increases GDP but is paid for by increased taxe or debt. Regards

Thank you for the input!!

There is an element to bank lending activity not mentioned in this interview by Steve Keen. This is the role of collateral and the pricing for risk based on the likely value of the collateral in the event of borrower default and foreclosure. Where real estate is provided as collateral, much depends on when during the property market cycle the loan is extended. During the first upward years of the cycle, land values (which are credit-fueled and speculation driven) climb at a rate exceeding the general rate of inflation. In consequence, when the end of the property market cycle nears there is a huge portion of land value that will quickly disappear as demand for property collapses. The portion most vulnerable is newly-constructed properties purchased when land prices were at their peak and the loan-to-value ratios of mortgage financing highest. As the crash of the property markets makes its way through the economy causing rising unemployment, delinquencies on all forms of consumer and business debt escalates.

Monetization of Jesus. Sinners

Global warming/climate change is pure fraud and has been so since day one three decades ago. Everything is a lie.

"Is it possible to pursue this program from India?"

and she's Ethiopian, oh yeah, another fellow from there is also about to join the competition 😊😊

this man is genuine...apart from his passionate books he is one of the best in terms of personality