Видео

@@emperorsascharoni9577 thats fair man totally agree but the reason I dont recommend learning systems is that they drain the fun out of the game and don't teach creativity in my opinion and lead to boring games, don't get me wrong tho I do like the kings Indian/grunfeld/ nimzovitch against d4 which is what i personally play like against the london or queens gambit setups as unlike the London which is boring they lead to quite tricky positions albeit giving white a small advantage but that dosnt really matter anyhow and the openings I just mentioned although are somewhat systems you don't necessarily play the same moves every game against ur opponent unlike the bs london i do like learning theory tho as I love learning lines in the najdorf or dragon in detail as that's my repotoire atm against e4 but at 1500 you don't need to learn 20 moves of theory lmao but that's just my opinion if you want to learn setup based openings its totally up to you I just personally prefer tactical creative games especially at that level as people blunder more often and fall for tactics, really good advice though man. 😀

@@thejackmeistro Yeah I just think lots of people over complicate it. Fun is obviously most important but for me I hated not having a response to every opening but learning all that stuff is too much. I play e4 with white so that’s where I can scratch that itch. Black I only play CaroKann (because I learnt about it for white already) or kings Indian, against everything else. An interesting example would be Tyler1 who reached 1800 in very little time with only tactics training and a system that’s not even good. I like giving the minimal advice necessary. Say what you need to do leave the rest to the individual. You need tactics to get good. Learn positional principles or openings and such if you like doing so but don’t think it’s necessary to reach 2000. As gm finegold likes to say “don’t blunder and you’ll win”

It depends really. If you enjoy playing more tactical fun games you can get many tricks and tactics from the Sicilian, for white and for black. However the Sicilian is VERY theoretical and for the more higher Elo players (especially the najdorf which I play) however for your rating however if you REALLY want to play the Sicilian id recommend learning the dragon Sicilian or an e6 Sicilian as they are quite tactical and fun to play and less theory heavy for black. and for white (if you play e4) if you face the Sicilian id recommend the alapin variation as it is quite uncommon and can catch your opponent off guard. I think these opening would benefit you as I used them at a similar level to get to where I am now. Hope this helps :)

@@thejackmeistro what is your chess id and rating bro can we play game

@@WHAT-gm1xm sure man i just dont want to leak my name i can message you privately though.

@@GiftigeBalspuwer So that you can learn the common ideas of middle games and endgames that come from your opening, and normally when you watch grandmaster games it gives a commentary over what the moves do and how they improve the position as by knowing this you'll find it easier to come up with attacking ideas, if you don't understand the moves try to spend more time focusing on that aspect or maybe try another way to improve until ur a higher elo as I started doing this at around 1500 elo. Hope this helps you ;)

That's Fair, I just thought id include it as its something I used to get a higher Elo as it helped me understand the middle game ideas of my openings more but it does take a lot of time to do. I do agree though that its more a higher level strategy to improve, although its still useful around 1500elo more so than 1000.😁

what do you mean by playing anonymous like not seeing your opponents Elo? also I agree what you said about a 500 being able to play better than their currant rating some of it is a psychological thing with being intimidated by your opponents Elo but also tiredness also. Or even the opening you get to play as you might know the position more, same way a 1500 might play like a 500 also.

@@thejackmeistro anonymous as in without an account so it doesnt affect your elo

@@calitreesweet yeah that's good I use that sometimes by playing unrated on my account on chess.com its good apart from the amount of cheaters I get and people quitting early as there is no obligation to play to win as no Elo is involved. If you wanna play anonymous for Elo id recommend this chrome extension I use that hides your opponents name and Elo until after the game :)

Exactlyyyy 😎😎🔥🔥🔥🔥

Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed the video and it helped you!😁

@@andrewcrane5105thanks I really appreciate it man means allot , hope you like my videos that ill post in the future like this one. Cheers man.😀👍

@@thejackmeistro yeah my dude I've been looking for more of a philosophical approach to getting better at chess and this was 100% exactly what I was looking for so much appreciated to you

EXACTLY the amount of games I've thrown from being too tired or annoyed is ridiculous, trying to chase my losses and losing more and more games. I would've reached 2000 sooner 100% if I only played a few games a day.

I suppose as to be REALLY good you have to devote your entire life to the game.

YES 100% the amount of times I've been tired and lost Elo on chess.com is ridiculous. I should've covered this but one of the main things that helped me improve was playing at my local chess club and in tournaments over the board as, they allow you more time to think. I cant remember how many online games I've thrown in the past 😭So my advice would DEFININITLEY be to play more over the board as you can focus on your game and moves more also allowing you to remember your moves better and spot tactics and what not. And of coarse its more fun as well.

I'm just curious if one can earn titles like CM, FM, etc. in chess without belonging to an OTB chess club? Thanks in advance for your answer.

@@mathewsamuel1386 it would definitely help playing otb more, to get a higher rating however you don't have to. To get a recognised FIDE title you have to atleast be 2300 fide for FM

😂 come on you arnt that bad you'll get to where you want to be in no time. Even I used to be like 600elo, all it takes it practice and patience and you'll get there bro.😀👍

exactly man 💯 all chess is is memorization and practice and you will get to where you wanna be you don't have to be some rocket scientist or something 😂 100% agree

You to fellow Christian brother, thanks for the support it means a lot to me. amen 🙏

@@dennisokoror9653 thanks that means alot man, I'm glad it helped you 🙏

even at 2000 I do that sometimes😂 but all I'm trying to teach is to play in a more concrete non (hope chess) way as by not blundering pieces in the first place you'll be able to win more on average. by all means punish your opponent if they miss a tactic or hang pieces but all I'm saying is you shouldn't just rely on them the higher the rating ladder you go :)

Simple Chess = best 💪

I suppose but they are of less common occurrence and you cant just rely on your opponents blundering every game in one move and playing hope chess like lower Elo ratings so I believe playing moves strategically/positionally is better but that's just my own opinion even though I even sometimes make stupid move and hang pieces in 1 move but lets not talk about that 😂

just lost three games from one move blunders as a 1300, but I do get some big brain moments so it’s worth it

@@lol-yz8fh as long as you focus in your games more and take more time thinking you moves and stop 1 moves blunders you will surely be like 200 points higher in no time 😂😊

@@thejackmeistro alr thx 😁👍

​@@lol-yz8fhsame 😭

I mean, does depend what line you want to play after Nf6 you could play the fried liver which is my favourite or even into the giuocco pianno. But for this level I think developing minor pieces like Nc3 controlling centre with pawns and getting to castle early is better for lower rated players of that level :)

Nc3 is totally viable even at 1500, it depends on your mittelspiel plan, really.

@@thejackmeistro The fried liver is not a great line objectively but I guess you can have some fun with it.

@@thejackmeistro The point of c3 is to control the center with a pawn, and the knight tends to be better placed on the kingside or on e3. Yes, Nc3 isn't a bad move, but it's just odd to recommend it.

@@DanLyndon I suppose its just i thought Nc3 was better suited for beginners and followed opening principles more if you want to play c3 as you get a higher rating that's fine as that's what I normally play, as the Italian is my go to opening as white or the fried liver attack its totally up to you and even some grandmasters play Nc3 i just suppose its more uncommon sorry if it was a bad recommendation.

Thanks I'm glad you enjoyed it! 😊

Thanks man, I really appreciate the comment I do try to put allot of effort into the videos I make. And I'm glad you enjoyed the video 😊😊

@@thejackmeistro its pretty obvious that you put a lot of effort into these vids .Hope you make it big one day

Thanks I Appreciate the support 👍😊

You'll be 2000 in no time

Glad I Could Help 🔥

It's a diss mate lol ​@thejackmeistro

how not everyone is 2000 at chess like me or you

Thank you so much for this comment I greatly appreciate it I'll try and bring a new video out this week I've been busy with life and such so I haven't uploaded in a while so I'll try to soon, again thanks 👍😁

I'm glad you enjoyed my video I appreciate your comment. I'll try and bring a new video out some time this week :)

Sure I understand your point how it isn't nececceraly a perfect game from vishi but Magnus made no mistakes during that game and immediately exploited vishi's blunder and that match was the turning point during the 2013 world championship when Magnus first became world champion

Thanks I really appreciate it :)

thanks :)

thanks bro make sure to subscribe if you want see to see more content :)

It's the advance variation of the winiwar not the regular advance french

How?

either way its a checkmate. queen can make the same move and its protected by the rook.

if he pushes the g pawn its mate next move :)

idiots or people who know lots of theory and want to throw you off :)

Then it's mate next move instead of mate in 2 if they take with the knight :)

Well then it's a completely different opening 💀

​@@thejackmeistrobut you said you'd teach me how to check mate in 11. My opponent played c5, what do I do?

@@omegonchris if you opponent plays c5 thats the sicillian defence i recommend playing the alpin against the sicillian :)

@@thejackmeistro I know it's the sicillian, but I wanted to use your mate in 11.

@@omegonchris you can still do my mate in 11 it's just your opponent has to play certain moves also I'll try and post more checkmate guides in the future to help you with other openings:)

Not sure what you mean are you on about a variation in which they push their pawn

The black pawn is pinned to the king so it can't move (notice white's queen)

What os ur elo because its not high. Thats crazy that you said that

dont pawns kills sideways

​@@adju952oh ok-

wym lol

Then It Isnt Checkmate But You Take Their Rook on a1 and You would be up And if They block the Check With The Queen Trade Because Your up! :)

After the knight takes bishop it doesn’t matter much what happens. The gambit has failed. Personally I would retreat the Queen and support another attack with more pieces. It doesn’t seem like a well thought out back up strategy that you have.

@@stevend.chavariaii1507 I'm not sure what you mean not every gambit has to end in checkmate and my eval bar on chess.com says it's +4.5 for black after they take the rook

@@thejackmeistro wait a minute. Isn’t this gambit titled England Gambit CHECKMATE? It’s a failure to it’s namesake. However after Queen takes rook (as you say) if the white Queen blocks check. It is still very possible to salvage/save the black Queen. Mainly by taking the rooks pawn or retreating the same way the Queen advanced. The white moves have been so busy blocking check after check the pieces are stagnant on the board. A Queen should never be sacrificed unless it’s a last resort. Preferably within the Kings striking distance. How long have you been playing? Because your defense lacks common sense.

@@stevend.chavariaii1507 I've been playing chess properly since 2020 and I'm rated 1600 blitz and like I've said if the white queen blocks check top engine line is too take and it's plus 4.5 for black what is your point I know the Englund Gambit isn't played much high level but it is a tricky gambit at the 800 rating range that is good to play against things like the London and such what is your rating?

Yes but you can push d3 and take back with the bishop at some point as they have weakened their centre that isn't covered in the video tho 😅

@@thejackmeistro i mean sure but you lost your bishop lol

honestly doesn’t matter its interesting i guess keep up the good content i’ll keep pushing you to improve your lines

What pawn what move do you mean? ❤

​@@thejackmeistrowhites E pawn

@@DannyMonkey7 If whites e pawn takes ur flank pawn you cant play the gambit but you are better because the position would ressemble a kings gambit accepted and whites centre would be weaker and have doiubled pawns :)