Видео

@@Brysengus Thanks man :) If you look through the video the current mic being used is listed in the upper right corner at any time, together with settings (no eq, eq and compressor, etc since I’m switching between the Røde VideoMic Go 2 and the Dji Mic 2 using both bluetooth and the proper receiver :)

@@serarchive23 Thank you, appreciate the kind words and you taking the time to comment :) What type of sewing project are you doing?

@@edgarlarsenphoto Takk takk :)

@@timovehkaoja Hahahahaha, thanks man :) Sometimes simplicity wins but I’m impressed with the Pocket «Tripod» so far, the tilt-function is surprisingly versatile for getting some angle variations. Going to Gothenburg this weekend so will be testing it properly «on the road» :) Btw, are you planning any new vids for the channel the coming year? It’s been awfully quiet there for the past 6-7 months, which is understandable with school and work and stuff, but your presence is sorely missed on the ‘tubes :) Btw: I ran into some «Oulu’ians» some weeks back, from Oulu Roller Derby, it sure is a small world :)

@ Yeah, there are plans and stuff, loads of ideas in writing phase but we’ll see what’s next 👍🏻 I got one ”surprise” coming.

Aah, carbon sh!t😅

@@StianTorp Oh yes, the added tilt-functionality is actually quite handy, more than I thought it would be, allows for some more variety in terms of height placement tilting it up and down rather than having to find the perfect height object to put it on :)

@@Jimmyd_Rocktalk Thanks man :) Hope Santa left you some goodies under the tree as well :)

@@paulinespurposefullife Thank you for taking the time to comment and subscribe :) Hopefully you’ll get something useful out of the channel going forward :) Merry christmas and good luck with the channel :)

@@mikebrewington1425 It’s all part of the process :) People have this weird idea that dumping all the footage in the edit page and starting to cut is «so much faster» … taking the opposite approach of adding stuff on the cut page rather than removing tiny pieces one by one might actually be faster in the long run :)

@ you are so right. My current work flow is similar to yours. I run through and add my rough cuts then review and clean up the footage. Then I set the Speed Editor aside and move to my latest tool the micro color panel for creating the look I want. Then I’ll move to Fusion to create beginning and end clips. After that it’s back to the Cut Page for transitions and finally off to Deliver. The majority of my footage is drone footage from the Inspire 2 & Mavic 3 Pro.

@ Sounds like you got the flow locked down for sure :)

@@mrjefftalks Heyhey and welcome to the gang :) No better combo than 500 subs and turning 50 :)

Hahahaha :) Yeah, that’s my Quad Skate store, going on 12 years now since Roller Derby started up in Norway - and the only store in the country as well so travelling with the shop as well on a regular basis :) You playing?

@@AndreSjoberg I was a ref in NY...Loved my time on skates. Thanks for your vids!

@ Aaaaah, sweet :) I lived in NY for 4 months back in the late 90’s and vacationed there for 3 weeks back in 2014 catching a couple of Gotham Derby internal league tournaments and visiting 5 stride shooting the shit with bonnie thunders and omg wtf, good times :)

@ And thank you for the nice comment about the vids, more weird stuff coming soon as I get more time during the christmas break :)

@@AndreSjoberg woot!

Thank you for those kind words :) Working on a large batch of videos releasing throughout christmas and early 2025, will be interesting to see how they perform relating to the «doing tøulyoutube wrong»-video ;)

Thanks :) The thing is that most of the advice people give on youtube is based not on knowledge but what other youtubers have said, and not even checking if it holds water or not - and most people have no idea how modern search engines operate - and I’ve seen several videos where people talk about title seo etc for getting one’s video in suggested, where they show a video with many views with a specific title, and then you look in the suggested to watch next column and the videos there have totally different titles, but the topic/subject matter is the same - and this only shows that even copying the style or wording of a well performing video doesn’t really help with the algorithm, RUclips suggests videos based on their topic closeness and performance, not similarities in title wording. But when a video *is* shown to a person that have been watching videos with similar titles the title likeness can play a role in regards to if they click or not - but for the algorithm to pick it up or not the keywords, titles etc plays no part, but the inclusion of those keywords and phrases in the video itself as part of the content does :)

@@AndreSjoberg Love this in depth explanation, That is so true!! I think too many of us small RUclipsrs are focusing too much on gaming the system or "tricking" RUclips's algorithm to push our content. While at the end of the day, having good content that people actually want to watch is what is going to lead to long-term success. Wishing you all the best -- keep crushing it!

You’re welcome :) And yeah, from a price perspective they are a good option if smartphone is the only use case, but if one own an action 4 or 5 pro or pocket 3 as well, or plan to in the future, the native integration tips the scale :)

Hahahaha, thanks :)

Thanks man, appreciate that :) Couole of times through the edit I contemplated just re-recording it because some of it felt sooooo sloooooow, and it really takes me a couple of sessions to «get going» ;) As for the «theory» on keywords, just think about it: - RUclips themselves say keywords have little to no purpose or weight - we know YT transcribes everything to be able to make auto-subs - we know google has way more AI stuff going on in the back than they have publicly released, and plenty of systems to analyze everything word of every video, especially since they’ve been doing this to website texts and search results on google search for a loooong time - and they have plenty of experience in classifying things like images, moods, tempo +++ from image analysis - and they for sure have ways of determining the «quality» of the way content is structured inside a video in the same way chatgpt can take 3-4 full pages of rambling text and structure it as a proper YT manuscript, it can also be used in reverse to determine the quality of the way content is presented in a video, and weighing that towards who to show a video to :) And just based off of the 2-3 videos I’ve had that popped off, based on topic and the target group and my channel size at the time with minimal keywordstuffing or other shenanigans, it’s safe to say that they trust their own analysis more than our input ;)

@@AndreSjoberg I agree and I have that same issue with recording. I often times record stuff several times before I feel finally okay with it.

@ Hahaha, yeah, it’s just part of the learning process and getting into the groove :) I do have some experience from the past 25 years stunting presentations for small and large groups of people when I worked full time in the dotcom-era and with companies when I was working in the advertising industry, a lot of times in english as well over those years, so I’m sort of used to doing things off the cuff and «making shit up as I go» rather than having a script, but in a live setting it’s quite different compared to in front of the lense, and I always think and talk better when walking around waving my arms and drawing on a whiteboard or some paper, my brain works faster when doing that, so I might have to try making a couple of «walk and talk and draw»-videos on some topics to see how that works out :) Or maybe even a live stream if I hit that 1k mark ;)

@@AndreSjoberg what will you use for the draw element? I've been thinking about this as well. I hate always sitting but I often need my notes on my computer to reference. I think I need physical queue cards instead.

@ Either an overhead cam drawing on a large piece of diffused plexiglass I found by the road a couple of months ago, or on my kitchen cabinet doors, notes will probably be some marker notes on pieces of paper stapled to the wall …

@@CaraKönigsblau absolutely, and of course, there is clickbait’yand pure lyin’ clickbate, shades of charcoal when it comes to that, itMs almost become an art for some to balance on the edge. As for the keywords, looking back when I was working primarily with the internet pre-2000s and yahoo as a «catalogue» and altavista and all that, everybody did keywordstuffing and that of course seeped into youtube when it rolled out. It‘a just sad to see channels like vidIQ still milking the «keywords are dead, but …» thing, just because they know it does well :/ The only reason it still exist is that there are a couple of uses, like youtube states, for misspellings and the fact you can click on a hashtag and get other videos with the same hashtag for topics - my suspicion is that it is so ingrained in some of the systems they still use that removing them completely would institute too much work and possibly break something on a fundamental level - kind of like how people let old crap sit in the garden and the shed because it’s too much work to collect it all and drive it to the dump :)

@@AndreSjoberg Haha funny comparison, but yes, you're abolutely right. And these yt guru channels really annoy me, they have like 100 videos of each topic saying exactly the same thing in another way. And some other things they don't mention at all, not sure if it's intentional or if they don't do their own research anymore and just follow similar channels and AI.

@ I honestly think they do the «same topic» videos because the influx of new people looking for the content, combined with an oversaturation of creators parroting that content, leads to them having to do the same thing over and over again to come off as «fresh» and take a part of the «market share» - that and the fact that they * have* to make a steady stream of videos to dominate, but there aren’t that many «secrets» and unique things to the whole youtube thing so they *have* to regurgitate stuff just to be able to create enough videos :/ It is very much like the «online business guru’s» making money from selling courses and teaching people how to make courses to make money online by making courses and teaching people how to make course and on and on … after a while the amount of people doing the same circle thing bites it’s own tail - like people studying to become teachers to teach people how to be teachers ..