Видео

I studied Literature in the 90s and I remember several professors saying Hemingway was bad at spelling. 25 years later, I decided to search for which words he often misspelled. I found an article in The Guardian that states: "He singled out, for example, the 1933 short story A Way You’ll Never Be, which mistakenly features the word “bat” rather than “hat” when the character Nick Adams is explaining catching grasshoppers to the confused Italian soldiers. Hemingway originally wrote: “But I must insist that you will never gather a sufficient supply of these insects for a day’s fishing by pursuing them with your hands or trying to hit them with a hat.”" I'm curious if others think writing "hat" instead of "bat" is an actual mistake? I know that I've personally tried to hit flies with a hat if I didn't have a bat nearby. The article is: "Ernest Hemingway's published works littered with errors, study claims"

Taylor Jose Walker Jessica Taylor Ruth

❤

Cross Laminated Timber

fantastic

wow what a coincidence this video ended up in my algorithm. i’m 25 and live in houston texas, but i was born and raised in pittsburgh and First Reformed was my childhood church growing up! so insane wow. the nostalgia.

Nothing but amazing the absolute dedication of men... to understand who they are.

I remind readers of Austen that the phrase "sense and sensibility" means "sense and sensitivity," and "sensitivity" in the sense of "emotionalism." Our use and definition of the word "sensibility" have changed profoundly in the past two centuries. In the title, Austen is drawing a contrast, not expanding on "sense" as she expands on "pride" in the title "Pride and Prejudice." Thank you, Sheikh Hamza, for a helpful and erudite reframing of Austen's work.

Seriously, "no better guide to Austen's spectacular style, psychological miniatures, and moral imagination"? Since when is he a Jane Austen scholar? That's insulting to people like Dr Octavia Cox.

Why is the Shaykh silent about Gaza?

Anakin... Ana... Kin... those who know... know....

Brilliant talk. And what thoughtful connections at the end! Thank you.

Can you provide any contact info for Steve Rummelsburg? Our conservative club would like to request him as a speaker.

I’m wondering what was the financial source of her financial aid? Hillsdale doesn’t accept any government money including financial aid.

See ‘More Deadly Than War’ by G Edward Griffin See ‘The Narrative’ by Bill Whittle See Yuri Bezmenov See Larry Elder and Thomas Sowell

Excellent discussion

Hello, I have a problem and it is that I am supposed to take the CLT exam today but I have not received the code to enter the exam, how can I get that code to take the exam, or talk to someone to send me the code ?

In the labyrinthine depths of Plato's Republic, wherein the philosopher king reigns supreme over the realms of form and idea, emerges, with an unfathomable intricacy and abstruseness, the Divided Line-a schema of unparalleled profundity, delineating the stratified world of cognition and the essence of being, the arcane and enigmatic contours of which bewilder even the most erudite minds. Here, Plato, with the precision of a master sculptor, carves the realms of knowledge and perception into a hierarchy that challenges the very foundation of understanding, presenting an allegorical vista that stretches from the shadows of illusion to the luminous realms of the forms, a tapestry woven with threads of obscurity and convolution, where the boundaries between concept and reality blur into an intricacy beyond comprehension. This Divided Line, an esoteric and cryptic construct, serves as a beacon for those daring souls who navigate the murky waters of knowledge, seeking the ultimate truth that lies beyond the sensory world, the ineffable and inscrutable essence of existence. It bifurcates reality into realms of the seen and the unseen, where the tangible world of our immediate experience-a mere reflection of a higher order-is juxtaposed against the intangible world of forms, those perfect and immutable essences that exist beyond the reach of mortal grasp, a concept so profound and arcane that it defies the very limits of linguistic expression. At the lowest echelon of this celestial hierarchy resides the realm of imagination, a domain shrouded in the shadows of illusion and conjecture, where truth is but a fleeting whisper in the cacophony of sensory deception, an enigma wrapped in the riddles of perception and subjectivity. Ascending from this mirage, we encounter the realm of belief, where the physical world, with its transient beauty and imperfection, offers a dim glimmer of the underlying reality, a stepping stone on the path to enlightenment, a path so labyrinthine and serpentine that only the most intrepid intellects dare to tread upon it. Yet, to traverse further along this path, one must transcend the sensory world, elevating the soul to the realm of mathematical reasoning, where abstract thought and the pursuit of eternal truths begin to illuminate the mind, illuminating it with the incandescence of incomprehensibility and the convoluted intricacies of abstract cognition. Here, in the sanctum of the intellect, the mind engages with the immutable laws of mathematics and geometry, glimpsing the divine order that orchestrates the cosmos, a cosmos so vast and inscrutable that its very existence challenges the boundaries of human comprehension. At the pinnacle of this metaphysical ascent lies the realm of understanding, the domain of the forms, where the soul, unshackled from the chains of corporeal existence, beholds the pure essence of being, a revelation so profound and perplexing that words fail to capture its essence. Here, truth is no longer an abstraction but a radiant reality, where the forms-those perfect exemplars of beauty, justice, and goodness-reveal themselves in their full glory, offering a vision of the cosmos that transcends the limitations of the physical world, a vision so sublime and labyrinthine that it defies the very foundations of linguistic expression. Thus, Plato's Divided Line unfolds as a map of the soul's journey towards enlightenment, a guide for the philosopher's ascent from the shadows of ignorance to the luminous realm of the forms, a journey fraught with the intricacies and complexities of metaphysical contemplation, a journey into the heart of the unfathomable and the enigmatic, challenging the intrepid seeker to grapple with the indecipherable mysteries of existence.

thank you so much for this video! I'm having the exact same experience and I feel the exact same way, being homeschooled and have a really literature heavy education the CLT has just made it so much easier for me!

Dr. Reynolds has Incredible insighs into how these classical texts compliment each other. I studied history in college and grad school. It wasn't easy, and naturally it's my life-long passion. I think it's made me a better person. I hope!

Flannery O'Connor?? Where is Twain, Melville, Eliot?

And ya did a really good job chuggin sweet tea and making it look real. Much chops stein.

Our govt..has become..the 40's russia

Love this guy

if you think usa is or ever was a democracy, further discussion unprofitable.

I think it to be wise to have mothers on the board of what to put on Sherwood.

Will this be available directly from the website & without downloading an app?

My book recommendation, read all the classics you can! Buy the paper copies! Build your family library! & listen to them too when you can.

I am ready for the audio books!!!!! I needed this years ago! I refuse to give my money to audible.

A strikek down is an admission that their origininal rulings were not correct. But how is it possible for the "greatest legal minds" of our U.S.A., after much deliberation, to gave made a mistake?

Thanks @Classic Learning Test for posting this video about affirmative action / supreme court. Here are the viewpoints expressed by Supreme Court justices regarding affirmative action. 1) This case is about a group called Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) who sued Harvard College and the University of North Carolina (UNC). They said that these schools were not fair in their admissions process because they were using race as a factor, which they believed was against the law. The law they referred to is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment*. 2) The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. The SFFA believed that by considering race in admissions, Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally. 3) The Court looked at the history of the Fourteenth Amendment and how it has been used in the past. They also looked at how other cases involving race and college admissions were handled. They found that while diversity in a student body can be a good thing, it must be handled in a way that treats all applicants fairly and equally. 4) The Court also looked at the idea of "strict scrutiny*". This is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional. 5) The Court found that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC did not pass strict scrutiny. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear or specific enough, and it resulted in fewer admissions for certain racial groups. They also said that the schools' use of race in admissions seemed to stereotype certain racial groups, which is not allowed. 6) The Court also said that the schools' admissions systems did not have a clear end point. This means that there was no clear plan for when the schools would stop using race as a factor in admissions. This was another reason why the Court said the schools' admissions systems were not fair. 7) The Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear, specific, or fair enough to be allowed. 8) However, the Court also said that schools can consider how race has affected an applicant's life. They can look at how an applicant's experiences with their race have shaped them and what they can bring to the school because of those experiences. 9) In the end, the Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the law. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not allowed because it was not clear, specific, or fair enough. 10) So, the Court decided that the SFFA was right. They said that Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally in their admissions process, which is against the law. They said that the schools needed to change their admissions systems to be fair to all applicants, no matter their race. *The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. *Strict scrutiny is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional.

Amaizing!

Just accidentally ran across this. Positive, non-punitive discipline can have such horrible consequences. I have seen it myself. I raised my 18 year-old this way, and he so lost and undisciplined. I did it out of love- what I thought was best at the time. The comment about disciplining your kids for running in to the street really hit home. It is like my son is running in to the street daily and expects no consequences.

🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

20 mins in and the title has not been met 😭

Just a month after sharing this presentation, the United States Supreme Court quoted from the 1215 Magna Charta in one of their decisisons limiting the power of the government. "The principle that a government may not take from a taxpayer more than she owes is rooted in English law and can trace its origins at least as far back as the Magna Carta." www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-166_8n59.pdf

I 😅 aqua😮tpptppt6?

Dylan ❤

Swetttttttg. Bbbbbbb. Nnn.

200!!!!!

It shouldn't be partisan, but it is because regardless of sides, a party uses propaganda to motivate people against the opposition. This will always be politics. We need to be wary of government programs that promise value, don't have enough oversight by the citizens, and has the potential for government pilfering.

Or... it could have been a magic ring😂.. Same effect..

No one cares

White man speaks with forked tongue. Old Native American saying.

Interesting how they have to talk around their love of fascism and theocracy.

You Andrew's son?

Why should we care? Our founding fathers didn't think that most people should be educated, basically just the straight white males who owned land and should be allowed to vote.

Listen to the full episode here: www.buzzsprout.com/1320010/12149695

Hi

Excellent