Видео

For me, ancient Skepticism remains the standard of doubt.Scientific and other types of skepticism are a mockery of ancient skepticism. Scientific skepticism is nothing more than a myth, nothing more than a fairy tale and nothing more than nonsense.

You kind of look like Eminem

14:13 15:04

Thank you!

I wish I could comment the same thing on all your philosophy of language videos. This was literally the most helpful explanation video I have ever seen for Russell's puzzles! Thank you so much!

this is incredibly helpful, thank you

Thank you professor Clarke for these videos. Question what book are the students having to use?

Sir, can I get answer of - What are the ends of Education according to Russell?

Thanks

Thanks

Why isn't "ashore" deleted from the sentence "Odysses was set ashore at Ithaca while sound asleep"? Like, as a native English speaker, I independently know that "ashore" is a verb in this context, but hear me out. What if "set" is the verb of this sentence? Then we would have "The person named 'Odysseus' was set a thing named 'ashore' while sound asleep at a place named 'Ithaca'". So, like, this example is super suspicious. Frege is smuggling contraband, isn't he?

Is it possible to make a contrapositive of (EyBay -> (Da \/ Ca)) like so (~(Da \/ Ca) -> ~EyBay), and then Demorgan on ~(Da \/ Ca), getting ((~Da /\ ~Ca) -> ~EyBay), by modus ponens ~EyBay, then Ay~Bay, then ExAy~Bxy ? Is a contrapositive thing not allowed in this kinda system?

still just 2023 dood

1:58 "Russell translates Bedeutung to Denotation."

Thank you for the video! Really helping me with my Epistemology essay.

It is very useful thank you oxford hand book of pragmatics by Huang very difficult

It’s really helpful! Thank you a lot!

Great lecture, Professor! Thanks for your work!

Gold! Very helpful, thanks Roger.

Is customary sense a indirect reference

sounds to me like a list of false dichotomies

Thankyou

Great job 👌👍 Mr.

Could you explain types of conversational implicature?

Thank you for making this series ☺️

I am the chairman of my house!

absolute life saver! Thanks so much

thanks a lot for good explanation, please do more

is infallblism and scepticism somewhat related?

This was very useful. Thank you.

Thank you for uploading this, very helpful for my revision!

Loving these videos, but PLEASE could you get a Blue Yeti or Samson Meteor mic and a boon arm, the audio is echoing and difficult to listen to! Thanks for the series though, not much good phil of language stuff free on YT!

Can you send me the lecture.? I mean as a pdf written not video

how does Frege's notion of reference and sense differ from Mill's conception of denotation and connotation?

Lovely set on truth tables. Memorize brutally indeed! Again, you're sending me back to the seventies, and early micro-computer coding, for which we used all these logical operators (at the algorythmic level) and another specialized form of truth table (for debugging) all the time. Nifty to see the concepts taken into the pure abstract (with no associated hair-pulling, 'cause I can't get my damn program to run right). ;o) Also hilarious to learn that tautology has a non pejorative technical usage - one of the weakest of the withering scorn criticisms an essayist like myself encounters! Also love the single exception in an entire truth table proving invalidity of a general argument. Feels like a (perhaps imprecise) isomorphism with Ian's recent point about the difference between 'pure' and much more limited arguments in popular points of social contention. Fertile stuff - much appreciated! Please tell me there is an n coming (isn't there always?) so that we may ultimately come to the transcendent formulation TTFN! ;o)

Great stuff once again - enjoying the lightness of tone greatly. I don't know how a baby works either, but union scale ain't enough to keep 'em from crying, that's for sure! WFF and PRFF? - haven't played for yonks - literally the late 70s, in my experimental schooldays (headmaster was a gifted mathematician, as well as demonic to the core). Splendid idea if so - dead curious what else, if not! (I have been inventing and studying games forever). Cheers man - appreciate the cererbral exercise!

Excellent clarity - thank you! Requiring rigour is only fair when a teacher goes out of their way to remember student-mind and address ambiguities - just as you do here and in the supplemental vids for the previous lecture - nice one. Must confess I am now wondering about potential usage of 'tomic' and thinking about various Thomas-types punnable thereby (for which, thanks again).

Excellent, and I especially love how subtly devious your example is (and that you give us all a nice long beat to feel smug for not being fooled, exactly when we are fooling ourselves!). Cases where we are instinctively certain in error, go most directly to places where we can make most useful improvements in our reasoning! (or at least specific explication). Cheers, man!

Excellent specificity - on aims, uses and requirements of self. Nice diction and meter, too - and I like the sly humour (and agree the architecture referent is superb). Small technical note (audio tech for decades). You have more headroom than you are using, and so might run out of volume boost on some student's laptops or other gear. Mild compression or even a simple audio limiter will let you push it up to 'full' volume without any risk of distortion (pinning the meters, in old-school terms). Looking forward to enjoying the rest of the series (and excited by further topics also - but I'll take it in sequence, and for once, won't rush my fences - always best to start with scales before you set up the Bach score on the music rack). ;o) Also - yes you should work more on poetry - but only because developing our less expert (mental) muscle groups so often informs and extends our specialist technique (and pleasure in life).

Thanks for the video, this is useful. Confucius teaches filial piety where the children should look after their parents, but Mozi would say that one should care for every parent in the same way. If you view what Confucius said as the prioritisation of responsibility then i don't think it would conflict with Mozi's rule of Universal love. Universal love doesn't negate prioritising responsibility as Mozi himself even prioritises the plurality of basic goods over everything else. If I have to cook 3 meals a day for my parents, then Confucius would say I'm good because I'm being filial, but Mozi would say that if I didn't do the same for other parents then I haven't achieved the ideal of universal love. Since I am a limited being I can only take on a limited amount of responsibilities within a limited time frame. If I cooked 3 meals a day for my parents and also cooked for other parents if they need me to, assuming i have the time and my other responsibilities are taken care of then i think Universal love is still being achieved.

thank you for sharing this, its hard to find philosophy classes

I wonder what a Ramseyian point would be regarding some versions of possible-world semantics vis-a-vis the interpretation of probability. I would think that Ramsey, being the expressivist that he was, would welcome a deflated notion of this semantic apparatus.

All links are going to answers about earings

ruclips.net/video/dhh0yqPT0zY/видео.html

I love the smile after "I have £100"

Nice! Hopefully you carry on uploading your lectures on ancient skepticism.

Excelente explicación ... no hablo bien el inglés pero recurriendo a los títulos pude entender el tema y hacer la diferencia entre el uso referencial y atributivo ... Thanks

This was really useful, thank you! I'm studying philosophy at the University of Exeter and I'm trying to get a head start on the year 2 modules and I'm going to be studying Philosophy of Language. I was having some difficulty understanding the difference between referential and attributive use distinction based on Donnellan's "Smith's murderer is insane" example, but your examples have made it much clearer for me :)

👍👍