Видео

I'm not sure. But yes, I ran my external battery pack on this unit.

@@roweETX That's good news. I tried on my unit, and while the unit will take power from a USB-C data connection, it won't pull from just a battery. If they've fixed that I need to update. :)

@@Howlin23 already is. Contact outdoor legacy 877-350-1818

@@roweETX gotcha. Haven’t seen it on their website.

@@Howlin23 you’ll need to call them.

The MH25 is not compatible with a daytime scope. It can not be used as a stand alone scope either. It only functions as a monocular. You would have to go to the RH25 if you wanted to utilize it as a scope or with a scope.

@@halodesolate about 80 yards

Was this the 19 or 25?

@@selborx This was with the 25.

@@KERSmark_Solutions I have a pic tail adapter fastened to the rh25. I have a team Wendy helmet, g24 mount, Wilcox modular dovetail, Wilcox modular folding bridge arm. With the pic tail adapter on the rh25, it will clip in to the modular bridge arm.

@@phoenixflame62118 it’s a lease pasture. We do not own it.

That one is tough. I like them both. For where I hunt, the Hybrid 75 at a 4x base mag is a bit too much. 90% of my shots are under 100 yards. I prefer a 3x base mag for my area. Now, if I was strictly hunting coyotes in more open country, and 90% of my shots were 150-200+ yards, then I would take the Hybrid every time. It really comes down to your area and how you hunt. Both are fantastic options.

Man, I would need more background information to give a precise answer. If I didnt need the magnification of 3x, most of my shots were closer range, then I would opt for the Rattler v2 because of the 2.5x base mag. I prefer to have the 3x base mag personally, so I would take the rh50 v2 over the Rattler for my use.

@@roweETX thankyou for your response

I agree!

I don't remember. I typically run them in the middle range of options. Just play with it some until you find the ones that look the best to you.

Yes. The Sniper Hog Light 66 LRX will give you about 400-500 yards of useable sight distance.

@@roweETX So do you think it will work to get rid of these problems? Coyotes, hogs, and Cats are a big problem. I think because not too many people remove these nuisance varmints any more. 100-300 yards is probably my max for now. I am debating between spend the bigger money on thermal vs night vision. I had the wraith older version and had to take it back. I don’t even think it was HD. It messed with my eyes. You are a big help. Thank you. We have had quail house cats and even a calf vanish.

I don't disagree. I go back and forth between color pallets, and the green crosshair is my favorite.

None of them are cheap, lol

I think they are almost the same as far as image quality goes. Both have a really nice image with great detail. The main difference would be the magnification is a little more in the Sidewinder 50-640

Shawn, it is very close in comparison. I have ran both units side by side, and the RH50R just has a tad more detail in the image that you don’t quite get in the rh50 v2. I think the only way you would notice the difference would be to have both scopes sitting side by side and compare. Otherwise, you won’t notice any difference.

@@roweETX good to hear. Hopefully they start getting back in stock soon, I’m itching to upgrade lol.

I feel it is not heavy. Not the lightest, but I don’t consider it a heavy scope. Perfect for AR platforms.

I can't remember. It's in the menu options. There should be a selection that allows you to turn it off/on.

It's a good one!

I edit with Adobe Premiere Pro. It has a preset for RUclips shorts so I just select the preset, edit the video, and it does the rest for me.

@@roweETX thanks man that's awesome.

No doubt!

Appreciate it!

I don't run the ballistic calculator on the scopes. I have messed with it some, but it's not something I use. Most of my shots are under 100 yards so I never really had a need for it. You mainly need all your bullet information and muzzle velocity for the ballistic calculator.

Both are good units. Similar image quality. The FH35 is cheaper with the LRF. The Axion is smaller. Battery system is better in the Axion. Warranty is the same with both. Image quality is very close, but I would probably give the FH35 the edge.

They are both comparable in image quality. Give us a call and we can discuss in further detail.

I am still running and testing multiple Rattler V2's, and all have held up and performed flawlessly. Just had the 256 version out this weekend and got some great footage on a big boar. These scopes do hold zero between all the swapping. Take that with a grain of salt because I'm not a precision shooter, but they are good enough for hogs/coyotes out to 300 for me. Thanks.

Thanks! It is a really nice scope!

You can use the scope in the daytime or at night. It will always be a thermal image though. It does not give you a clear color image like a daytime optic would.

I plug the scope directly in to my computer via the usb-c cable that comes with the scope. Turn on scope, go to menu, select connect to computer, and then all your files are right there for copying and viewing. Thanks.

Best investment ever made, running the nox18 and a halo XRF. 🤟

We typically do not go into any detail over firmware updates because there are so many and so many versions that it's impossible to keep up with them all. I would suggest giving a call to AGM directly. They have always walked our customers through firmware updates over the phone.

@@roweETX ok Thanks Ashley

Yes, that has been an issue with some units.

Yes. We have several bird watchers that have purchased this unit because it is small and fits in your hand easily.

I'm not saying you are incorrect, but I do know that we sight in every one of our thermals during the middle of the day. I was just out today using the new AGM rattler V2 and I had zero issues with it at all during the daylight. They have always worked for me, and I have never had an issue with AGM on warranty.

@@roweETXI use all of mine during the day. The problem was that I have had all 3 of my agm scopes go into burn protection mode when I scanned past a guy with a lit cigarette, also panned across a small campfire in the distance and from the exhaust pipes on a truck driving by. I have looked into this much deeper and found that the materials used in their microbolometer are not solar rated and can be damaged by viewing “hot” items. This may not be an issue for the hog hunters, but it certain is for the people who are gearing up for any real world tactical situation. My flir and iray scopes can look directly at the sun all day long without any problems. This is the first time that I had ever heard of them having the warranty voided if they know the scope was used during the daytime hours.

They are both very close in image quality. The Finder comes with the LRF function, but the sidewinder does not. The button layout and ergonomics are better on the sidewinder. Battery win goes to the sidewinder. Both have a 5 year warranty. I think it comes down to whether or not you need the LRF.