Видео

510 the Almighty God saved Noah and his wife and their three sons and their wives eight souls how many people were on earth when Noah was building the ark and how many religious organizations were there why did the Almighty God save only Noah and his family?

510 the Almighty God saved Noah and his wife and their three sons and their wives eight souls how many people were on earth when Noah was building the ark and how many religious organizations were there why did the Almighty God save only Noah and his family?

EXCELLENT video. Bless my parents, they taught me in the truth. I was raised in a house church, but fell away and found myself in mainline Baptist churches the past 20 years. I repented, and then walked into a Reformed Baptist church. I thought it was great because they emphasize the need for holiness, but they preach past, present, and future sins being blotted out, along with Calvinistic theology (which is hard to follow when you put all those together). I'm not sure where to turn, but I've considered going back to my parent's fellowship. Peace to you from Houston.

I think Jeremiahs prophesy is in reference to the new jerusalem in revelations.

If I’m not married should I cover my head ?

Good teaching, I am very surprised to hear this in a religious bldg. NOBODY preaches on this, so called pastors say “oh it’s not for today” and it amazes me how many profess Christian women are DISOBEDIENT to head-covering. I have learned that when the LORD saves you HE strips you of pride and vanity and we absolutely need that. I remember the words of brother John, HE MUST INCREASE, BUT I MUST DECREASE. What prideful woman wants to decrease? Many women that profess CHRIST don’t love the LORD who shed HIS blood for them they are lovers of self just as 2 Timothy 3:1-2 says. They follow the ways of the world, the fashions of the world they don’t grow in godliness much less covering their hair THAT IS THEIR GLORY! We MUST cover our glory so that only the GOD’S glory is seen HE IS worthy of ALL praise and glory not you with your sensual hair REPENT, TURN TO CHRIST FOR THE REMISSION OF YOUR SINS!

"Obey" originally meant in Hebrew: To hear, To listen Which is a big difference to modern-day Western English definitions

Excellent and much needed teaching. What a joy to see faithful brethren opposing the common evil.

awesome video! was listening to this in bed at night with the lights off and a fan on. heard that baby crying in the background of the vid but it sounded like it was coming from my room and nearly gave me a heart attack lol

Great teaching. 1. Thank you especially for the insight regarding Adam Clarke. His lie becomes obvious through Genesis 38:15, where the same verb (G2619 ΚΑΤΑΚΑΛΥΠΤΕΤΑΙ) is used as in 1Cor 11, stating that prostitutes covered their face which obviously implies the top of the head as the support for the face covering. We would have long ago identified that lie if we would not have stopped using the Greek OT as handed over to us by CHRIST. Gen 38:15 "And when Judas saw her, he thought her to be a harlot; for she covered [Strong's G2619 ΚΑΤΑΚΑΛΥΠΤΕΤΑΙ, katakaluptetai, From G2596 and G2572; to cover wholly, that is, veil: - cover, hide] her face, and he knew her not." 2. But it comes close to legalism to add to the Bible to wear head coverings all the time. The speaker only provides a personal experience and another believer (Chrysostom) as reason, but lacks a biblical justification for this assumption. With the same logic, men would never be allowed to wear anything on their head. 3. Evil angels are probably not being meant, because we are not anymore in times where women are being abused through those. Angels rather refer to the prayers they receive and then are brought before Him, essentially providing a woman the same access to the Heavenly than a man has without head covering, by elevating the authority of a woman towards angels in those moments of prayer. See Mat 18:3-10, Luk 1:13, Rev 8:3-4, 1Tim 5:21 More biblical arguments (6 in total) for head coverings are found in the study on my website.

Scripture says Jesus was without sin on the cross, like an innocent sacrificial lamb… Hebrews 9:14 NKJV - how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself 👉without spot👈 to God, cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the living God? And here, the word “redemption” is defined as “a releasing effected by payment of ransom” or “liberation procured by the payment of a ransom”… Romans 3:24 NKJV - being justified freely by His grace through the 👉redemption that is in Christ Jesus,

I think I might have been overlooked for a job because of my head covering although I looked very elegant according to a lot of people who have met me

I'm curious. The analogies used of both the spring and the Sun illustrate the heads hip of the Father and the Son. Where is the Holy Spirit come in?

"Christians tend to make two mistakes when thinking about church history. The first mistake is to ignore it or think it unimportant. this view forgets that the Holy Spirit has been working in the church throughout the centuries to gift " shepherds and teachers"( Eph. 4:11) so that they would guide and teach the church.... The second mistake is to idolize church history,. or at least some part of it. I have met Christians who seem to think as if there was some golden age of doctrinal understanding long ago, and our task today should be simply to" get back" to that understanding of the past, such as the views of the early church Fathers, or the early creeds of the church, or Augustine, or a Luther,or Calvin, or the Puritans, or Wesley. but this view can neglect the fact that our only perfect source of doctrine is the Bible itself, and no one in history has understood it perfectly. Rather Christ has been working in the church throughout centuries to "sanctify" it. so that at the end " He might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing that she might be holy and without blemish."(Eph. 5:26-27)" - Gregg Allison, Historical Theology Forward pgs.1-2; I would like to point out, that there has been no person except God and Christ who has understood truth 100 perfectly. There is never been a golden age the people falsely believe that the church in understanding and doctrine had it all together.. not even the apostles. Acts & the Gospels confirm there lack of understanding. So I would like to kindly point out the false belief that there was a golden age of understanding truth has never existed and it's actually a form of idolizing.

I absolutely love the quote by Bonhoeffer.

Im not saying its wrong in the interpretation of verse 16 as you and others state, "no other churches are being continuous, so you shouldn't be. " my paraphrasing of course. I don't see Paul telling them not to be continuous because no other church is, i see Paul making them do some self examination. Its kinda like when Jesus was telling his disciples that one of them was going to betray him, then they started asking, "Is it me Lord, am i the one?" We must remember that one of the main reasons Paul wrote this letter is because the church in Corinthian was being continuous! We see that in the first chapter. Therefore by him pointing out that some seem to be continuous it caused them to do some self examination. "Is it me Paul, am i the one being continuous?" Furthermore if they want to continue being continuous about this then it doesn't matter then we don't have any such custom. Just disregard everything I said and it doesn't matter. Paul was getting to the heart of the matter. Just my thoughts on that verse.

Jesus and the disciples ate the last supper on the 14th day of Nissan, when the Passover lamb was to be killed. Once this fact is established, no one can legitimately deny that Jesus broke unleavened bread for his disciples. No one can claim that a contradiction exists between John’s timetable and that of the other gospel writers.

Embracing change is great. Like when you realize Christ meant what He said to the people He was talking to. Jesus came back in there generation. We are in Revelation 20. Satans short season of deception and war. This is the great awakening. Please believe Jesus over any teaching of men. Its the great deception. Hiding that the 1000 year reign of Christ already happened. May the ones who have eyes to see and ears to hear come to the knowledge of truth. Peace be unto all. Truth is truth.

GRACE AND LOVE ❤️ LOVE YOU BROTHER 😍

What about the Holy Spirit? Person or no?

i've been researching this topic for maybe 2 months now. i read 1 Cor 11 and just read over the headcoverings because i was taught that it wasn't necessary anymore due to culture differences. However the Lord convicted me about modesty several months ago and i've since changed my entire wordrobe to glorify Him over my body. Headcovering seemed to be the next thing He was asking me to do. The excuse of culture suddenly, at the Holy Spirit's guidance, didn't make any sense to me because the Word of the Lord surpasses the changing of culture. Jesus is the same yesterday, today, and forever! ❤ i have only recently begun headcovering, just under a week. i went to evening service a couple days ago and was nervous about it. i'm going to church tomorrow, as it is Sunday, and am nervous about it. People will start to notice and i am so concerned that i will lose friends over it, and possibly be told by an elder, "we don't do this here." Now of course, the latter situation is unlikely because my church isn't that type of church. i'm fully aware it's my flesh and the enemy spinning worse case scenario stories 😅 Nevertheless, i am worried i'll be mocked as being some religion, or be told i'm putting myself under the law in a legalistic manner, or something or other. i have never seen any woman cover their head at my church so i have nooo idea how this will go down. Anyway, thank you SO incredibly much! These videos were answers to my prayers! i asked the Lord for wisdom and guidance on how to answer when the time comes that i'm asked! Even if i lose friends or find hardship in this, i desperately want to honour the Lord, draw nearer to Him, and i know He has asked this of me. Who am i to say no to my Saviour? 🥰❤️🙌🙏

1 Corinthians 11:15 tells me as a female my long hair is my covering and is a glory. So as a Christian, I don’t have to wear a head covering to reach Christ or be presentable to a congregation like false religions require like Islam and Hindus or cults like Catholicism. Think about the religions and cults that DO mandate female head coverings. It’s legalistic and the Church is not under the Mosaic Law. We’re under Grace and nothing can be ADDED to what Jesus did on the cross to put a barrier between Him and me 💜

14:35 This is so funny 😂🤣

I find your arguments compelling. There are however some church fathers who do believe Jesus had a beginning. I use to be affiliated with the watchtower but I don't believe Jesus Is a creature or Michael the Archangel. I believe Jesus is Divine like Jehovah and inherited his divinity From The Father. So he was begotten literally from The Father's essence but is still temporal. So he wasn't created from nothing. I do however in a sense believe in his eternal nature and that he is the eternal Word and reason within God but Begotten out of the Father when he spoke before anything was created.

There is so much nonsense in this video. Luther was used mightily by God to bring the Gospel back to light in a world that was suppressed by the false teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. Salvation by faith alone doesn’t mean that followers of Christ bear no fruit. Jesus said believers and unbelievers are known by their fruit. Salvation by faith alone also doesn’t mean that you just throw out doctrine. Correct doctrine is correct belief in the correct savior. You mentioned that Jehovah’s witnesses have faith, but they have faith in a false Christ. They believe that Christ is a god and not the only God. Roman Catholics believe that faith initially saves you, but then you have to keep their rules in order to maintain your salvation. That’s heresy and heresy does not save, but it condemns. Also, Luther’s teaching against works righteousness was the exact same thing that Paul wrote against in Ephesians 2:8-9 and in Romans 3:20 when he says that nobody will be justified by works of the law. We are spiritually dead sinners who have no hope in trusting Christ unless God draws us to himself as Jesus said. Our will is in bondage to sin and we will always run away from God unless he comes to us and changes our heart. Another point you made is that Luther taught eternal security. How is eternal life actually eternal if one can lose their salvation? Jesus said he would lose none that the father gave him, speaking of his sheep, those who trust in him. I felt the need to debunk the main points of this message because true Christianity was majorly misrepresented.

I agree with what you friend Dean Taylor said. This teaching makes the most sense not only biblically and spiritually but also logically. Thank you for sharing the Christian faith of the aerly church. God bless his people in Christ. Amen

Great series on training men into leadership roles in the church. Thank you so much👍

Wow so helpful I will send this to all the men in our church. Thank you so much😀

Wat about in instances were we are living with a family member that is toxic and constantly does things to provoke u over and over and never repents? How do u live with such people without ever developing a grudge? Is it not better to separate from that person?

Sound Faith Ministry, I respctfully disagree with certain part of your teaching. At the 20:10 stamp mark you say "your past sin not your future ones" are forgiven and you claim it is not historic faith. What we find is that the Bible speaks of our forgiveness of sin as having been already completed. The result is that believers now have the status of being saved having no more condemnation. In order for this to be true, all our sins must be forgiven including future sins that haven't yet been confessed. Secondly, When we accept Jesus as our Savior, God forgives all our sins: past, present, and future. Forgiveness comes as a total package; God does not forgive us partially but wholly. The believer in Christ can say, “My future sins are forgiven” for these reasons: • When Jesus died, all of today’s sins were yet future. Jesus did not die only for the sins of people who lived before Him. He died for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:2), including the sins of those who lived after Him. • If our future sins are not forgiven, then two things must happen: 1) when we sin in the future, we revert to an unforgiven state, meaning we lose our salvation and must be saved again, and 2) Christ must die again to cover the sins we’ve committed since His last death. Neither of these scenarios is biblical. We are kept by God, and thus our salvation is secure (John 10:28-30); and Christ died “once for all” (Hebrews 10:10; cf. Hebrews 7:25). I have more reasons to it, and I think this is sufficient for the time being. Any coments please. Thank you.

Amen

Having never heard Protestant teachers say the kinds of things you accuse them of (especially in your needlessly incendiary graphics) I would simply offer my perspective on 4 of the Solas based on applying scriptures to understand Ephesians chapter 2. Ephesians 2:4 But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, 5even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ-by grace you have been saved- 6and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, 7so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. 8For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, 9not a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them. By Grace alone, that is to say only by the unmerited mercy of God. For herein is love, not that we loved God but that he loved us(1John 4:10) Through Faith alone, for without faith it is impossible to please God (Hebrews 11:6), whatever is not of Faith is sin (Romans 14:23), and by Faith our hearts are cleansed (Acts 15:9) In Christ alone, for there is no other name by which we can be saved (Acts 4:12) To the Glory of God alone for He will not give His glory to another (Isaiah 48:11) and we are created in Christ Jesus for good works to glorify the one who thus creates us because we show by our good works that Christ is living in us (Gal 2:20)

THANK YOU FOR THE TRUTH!! ❤ May God continue to bless you with sharing the truth

Good work exposing these sloas

Amen!

Justin Martyr seems to have suffered from a similar spirit of arrogance as his Jewish opponents, to the point that he was at least borderline antisemitic. Irenaeus is far more biblical in his approach, and more humble and logical. Based on my own studies, biblical sacrifices within a covenant are gifts, not payments. “‘Whoever swears by the altar, it is nothing; but whoever swears by the GIFT that is on it, he is obliged to perform it.’ Fools and blind! For which is greater, the GIFT or the altar that sanctifies the GIFT?” Mat. 19:18-19 “So if you are offering your GIFT at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your GIFT there before the altar and go. FIRST be reconciled to your brother, and THEN come and offer your GIFT.” Matthew 5:23-24 Atonement and sacrifices are to be understood as relational/covenantal, not legal/contractual: “Gather to Me My saints, who made a covenant with Me by sacrifice.” Psalm 50:5 Generally, the animal offered was also eaten. This was also a part of fellowship and reconciliation. The smell of barbequed meat is often referred to as a smell of sweet savor to God - he was the honorary guest to the meal. A sacrifice is only legitimate AFTER dealing with sin problems: “You will not delight in sacrifice, or I would give it; you will not be pleased with a burnt offering. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise…THEN will you delight in right sacrifices, in burnt offerings and whole burnt offerings; THEN bulls will be offered on your altar.” Psalm 51:16,17,19 Also, Isaiah 1:11-18

Well, I can fullheartedly agree. The good shepherd gives his live for the sheep and is not always welcome. He has his sheep on his heart. To be a shepherd is the most valuable task a man can have. Nowadays people go around like sheep who have no shepherd. Nobody wants to do this ministry and nobody can do this ministry but only a shepherd! Christ: I am the good shepherd the good shepherd gives his life for the sheep. I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. Paul: For none of us lives to himself, and no man dies to himself. For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die unto the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord's. For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he might be Lord both of the dead and living. For such a ministry we have to be a minister of the new covenant. Who also has made us able ministers of the new covenant; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter kills, but the spirit gives life. May God bless you in your service as a good shepherd in the tradition of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, all the prophets, Jesus Christ our dear Lord and Saviour, the apostles and all those holy men who were able and willing to do this great service.

In general, I agree with your message. However, I would suggest a closer look at the texts and the real-life scenario of the times in which the statements were made. There are two different words used in the Matthew texts, both of which are translated as “divorce”, but they are not the same. One word is “apolysē” (Strong’s 630) and means to send away, or to dismiss, as when Jesus dismissed “apolysē” the crowds in Mat. 14:22. The other word is “apostasiou” (Strong’s 647) and more specifically means divorce in the full legal sense. The first, “apolysē” (Strong’s 630), does not necessarily include the second, “apostasiou” (Strong’s 647), and that is what Jesus is pointing to. Men were apparently simply sending their wives away (like the Romans did), throwing them to the street, and not taking the step to formally divorce. In these cases, the wife was still legally married but had been thrown out and her only recourse in that society was to shack up with someone for personal survival or live in prostitution, as it was not normal for a woman to live alone. This dismissal without papers is why Jesus BLAMES THE MAN for causing her to commit adultery - he shares fault with her for not having taken the proper step of granting full divorce. 7 They said to him, “Why then did Moses command to give a roll of divorce (with divorce papers) [St. 647] AND send her away [St. 630]? [Notice these are TWO steps.] 8 He said to them, “Moses, in view of the hardness of your heart, allowed you to send away [St. 630] your women. However, from the beginning it was not this way. 9 Now I tell you that whoever shall send away (with no divorce papers) [St. 630] his woman except for porneia [which grants divorce] and marries another commits adultery and he who sends away (with no divorce papers) [St. 630] commits adultery. Matthew 5:31 Furthermore it has been said, ‘Whoever sends away (with no divorce papers) [St. 630] his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce (with papers) [St. 647].’ 32 But I say to you that whoever sends away [St. 630] (no divorce papers) his wife for any reason except sexual immorality CAUSES her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a woman who is sent away (no divorce papers) [St. 630] commits adultery. [He is guilty because he forced her to find another man without having formalized the divorce.]

Thank you, Kyle. Made me think deeply about certain "everyday" Scriptural texts

Jesus said a kingdom divided cannot exist. You can't serve God in the kingdom of God in the spirit and serve the devil in the kingdom of darkness in the flesh....

Are you, David W. Bercot, the writer? April 13 1950? Historian? Are you?

I have been brought to realise that it is important to cover my head. On and off through my life I played for head covering. And about 6 months ago it was impressed upon me that I should wear head covering by the Holy Spirit. And I feel blessed. 😊

For there are three that testify: 8 the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree.

Stake is misstake :) or prheps number free alternativ , be free Blessings

Glad to hear the Romans commentary is still progressing.

Always knew there was a spiritual side to evolution. That side was only occulted and the materialist version was presented to the public

I am born a Lutheran and while I am now challenged with many of their teachings I have no question that I would not be a Christian without them and the faithfulness of my father to Lutheran doctrine. That also applies to much of the nasty history of the catholic Church. All I can do is live with what I know now. And be thankful that Martin Luther managed to free the Bible from the control of the Catholic church and eventually allow every believer to have unlimited access. Of course that now puts a huge responsibility of us to do something with it and unfortunately most keep this treasure to themselves. Or use it for there own selfish purposes. So we can't be too harsh on old Martin. Likewise I think RUclips is godless but then again we get access to the most amazing teaching! Like this Chanel. Thank you.

This is a great series on Roman's! Could I please get the name of the Martin Luther bible you used to quote from? I want some people to read it with there own eye's.

Absolutely..... so clear......

Whos objecting? In all three abrahamic religions, women covered. In all three, covering is not required in practice. This is a LADIES issue, i wont even discuss it with a man. Im fed up reading grumpy posts from men, who, themselves have far more serious issues they need to work harder on. You know, like sexual debauchery and perversion? Yep, its an issue with men, is it not? A scarf is benign compared with that! Its not pornographic to wear! A beautiful scarf is not a sin. Butt out, boys, and control yourselves. Show some respect to the ladies, and if you're lucky, we might cook a nice meal for you.