Видео

What is the proof that if we change the order, still bijection exists

I think it’s |G|^p-1

2:56 Title 🗿

Great video

thank you for this course I think is better to say psi_e=id_X not=e

Every goddamned lecture on this topic provides the same half as$ed description using cr@ppy notation. Don't use product notation to denote a freaking function output.

Ramsey Bolton being this good at math makes him even scarier

The video is low quality @5:52 a video called "some history" skips the history @9:57 please prepare your examples

why if we have a transposition on the sub it becomes the whole group?

Thank you for the explanation ❤

Cheers Thanks

this channel is really under rated

thank u so much for vdos can u please tell me which textbook was used, and is there any link to the coursepage for assignments

Is it the S3 Group or the Dieder Group D3 ?

Amazing

f a i l

Great lectures. Pity about the squeaky marker.

Thank you for uploading.

Балдеж

Thanks Danni, Loved your explanation, helped me connecting dots of Projective space from (algebra, analysis & geometry), indeed VectorSpace keeps it simple & concrete, Appreciate the effort, looking forward. 😃😃

Fórmula of quadratic is wrong

Nice video Sir Ji . Love from INDIA 🇮🇳.

Great video!

great video! made things really clear!

Wow😘

How u write backwards

I love the dramatic exit at 2:48 xD honestly I needed it ! I'm currently studying Geometry with a Klein Erlangen Program flavor and Projective Geometry in particular, and this series is helping me out a lot, thank you very much !

Thanks for your work! Hello from Irkutsk 😉

how do you write backwards?

You made the explanation really easy to follow, I just have a tiny complain/observation . . . The way you wrote Z/2Z in the video, doesn't it make it look like a Quotient Group? Isn't the Set of elements of mod 2 supposed to be identified with the notation 2Z?

I know we can find the smallest subgroup containing some elements, but does anyone ever go the other way and find the smallest set that generates the group? Would it even be useful? And is there a better way to do it than brute force and checking all possibilities? That would be a very expensive computational problem.

man really made up a variable for his example number omg

wow this man is writing all of this inversely thats impressive

Thank you sir, very informative.

I almost skipped this lecture, thinking it would be just a revision of relations. I'm glad I din't, the last part on conjugation was very interesting

I'm curious, is there any method to count the number of groups of order n?

Very nice explanation! the examples are really helpful :)

Wonderful presentation!

Dr. Rudenko, Thank you for posting this excellent video. Could you please tell me what textbook you used for the course. Thanks!

Un superbe travail qui permet de bien comprendre la théorie des groupes . Jusque là toutes ces notions restaient bien compliquées pour moi . Vous apportez enfin un éclairage intense avec des exemples très parlants. Je vais vous suivre régulièrement . Merci pour tout.

This was so helpful. Thank you!