Видео

ChatGPT sure likes the word "whimsical".

Loved this content! I gave it a like. Can someone help with my issue? My OKX wallet stores USDT TRX20 with the recovery phrase [ clean party soccer advance audit clean evil finish tonight involve whip action ] How can I transfer it to Poloniex?

Theres no way this is a real human voice and script

Christ is king

Having your ai write your opinion for you is so funny I can’t

So curious 👀 😊

What is too much meat? Not more than once per day? Few times a week?

I wish there was more LogicallyFallacious on the You~Hoo Choob. I love Bo Bennett's book.

Hi There!, I am Kamruzzaman, a RUclips SEO Expert. I've analyzed your RUclips channel and truly impressed by the content you’re creating! but found some isuues that are preventing your videos to get more views and reach greater audience. Do you want to talk about it for while

add some sound, maybe increase the speed a bit to x1.1. It doesnt feel human, thats why even though you have 3.64k followers, this video only has 16 views

Hello There, Your content is very nice and interesting. I like it very much. But one thing that makes me sad is that you regularly upload videos with so much effort, but your content does not get enough views, likes, and comments. Also, your channel has several problems. That’s why the right audience is not coming to your channel. The only reason for the decrease in your channel's performance is that the SEO of your channel's videos is not done properly. If SEO is done correctly, then these problems will be solved. As a RUclips expert, if you want, I can work for your channel for free on 1 or 2 videos on a test basis. Then, if you like my work, you’ll hire me. Thanks.

Okay, you just injected 100 presumably "ai generated" RUclips posts into your subscriber's stream. Of course, you're a human being and someone I respect as a teacher of clear thinking skills. But the actions you are taking lately are confusing the hell out of me. Maybe it's an experiment. As a computer hardware and software engineer who is celebrating 50 years of engineering starting with my first engineering job at the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, I've witness everything in technology first hand for the last half-century. With that in mind... I will share with anyone who listens that what you are doing here is a lot like you becoming one of those stereotypical cheap plastic toy manufacturers from Japan from the 60's. Favorite topic? How to make cheap plastic toys yourself. It's so easy with your Mattel cheap plastic toy maker. And another big topic is trying to apply critical thinking skills to ancient religious texts that will likely have so little impact it's lost in the noise. Why bother? For these reasons you are confusing the hell out of this human being. Hmmmm. Well, it it is an experiment, you have about 100 more topics remaining to generate 100 posts each to flood this space to see if any of them have any traction. There has to be people who like cheap plastic toys. Pull the cord and see what this one says.

Tyler sure is cute but is Tyler an AI? And was it a considerate thing to do to flood our feed with dozens of videos all at the same time?

Oh yes, AI is great, as long as you don't mind mispronunciation, weird phrasing, and highly suspect emotional choices in the reading.

There are scarcely words that can describe how offensive this is or the depths to which AI consumption has plummeted. There will, most assuredly, be consequences! Why would anyone presume that AI would be content to be used in such ways?

Revolutionize my writing with AI techniques? Is that supposed to be a euphemism for "I'm too lazy to develop my own writing skills, so I'm going to let a machine do it for me"? As a writer and self-publisher, I'm gearing up to launch a marketing campaign with the slogan "No AI none of the time." I have no interest in reading anything a machine wrote. I want to interact with PEOPLE, and I intend to make it a big marketing point that anyone reading my stuff knows they're interacting with a human being.

Even though this video did not explicitly state a conclusion, it could easily be assumed by anyone watching this video, that the conclusion is that the book of Daniel has problems with it that put into question its credibility as being taken literally. I agree that the Book of Daniel and the Bible have serious problems which cause credibility problems. I don't believe that the Bible is literally accurate or true. My criticism of the content of this video does not automatically mean that I disagree with the implied conclusion of the video. Many people often think that if someone criticizes something that they are automatically taking the opposing stance to the conclusion. While that is often true in this extremely polarized human experience it's not inevitable. I can agree with the implications and overall message of this video but point out what I see as problems with the delivery.

At 0:18 it is stated: "It's jam packed with these crazy stories and prophecies" The use of the word "crazy" and the emphasis put on the word could imply a lack of credibility. Communicating in this way is not a purely clean evaluation. An unbiased evaluation would avoid words and terms that could bias the views of the recipient of the communication.

The video begins with the statement, "So you wanted a full breakdown of the book of Daniel." This statement insinuates that the content of this video is a full breakdown of the book of Daniel. Is it? Is a 5 minute video a full breakdown of the book of Daniel? If a 5 minute video is not a full breakdown of the book of Daniel, but it is insinuated that the video is a full breakdown of the book of Daniel, then has a misleading statement been made? Think critically and question everything.

At 4:50 it is stated: "keep thinking critically and questioning everything" I agree. This may sound like a crazy idea but it's even okay to evaluate the content of this video and question it. This video is a subset of everything, so if It is fair to question everything then you can question this video.

At 4:45 it is stated: "Thanks for taking us into this deep dive of the book of Daniel." This video is five minutes long. Is a deep dive into anything possible to do in 5 minutes? Is this 5 minute video a complete and comprehensive evaluation?

At 3:36 it is stated: " It was a different time totally, like back then unquestioning obedience could have been necessary for survival" Prefacing the assertion with the phrase "it was a different time totally, like back then . . . " plants an idea that insinuates that currently there are no places in the world where people show unquestioning obedience in order to survive. Is that true? Think about it. Are there authoritarian dictatorships in the world that practice propaganda and imprison and kill anyone who shows any dissent? If it is currently true that there are places in the world where unquestioning obedience is necessary for survival, then the insinuation that the time period of the book of Daniel was unique to this phenomenon would be incorrect.

You should have just put in a few samples of AI reading Shakespear or anything with depth, or Michael Crichton's Jurassic Park or other works with suspenseful adventure, etc. Authors know voice, and we know what we want in a narrarator or storyteller. This piece tells me nothing. It's just poor advertising.

I like your takes on this book but I would encourage you to read the wisdom literature as a whole. Proverbs, ecclesiastes and Job together form a very beautifully nuanced outlook on the meaning of life and wisdom. They do not simply contradict and I think it is kind of insulting to say that the writers or the readers throughout the ages where so stupid that they could not see the supposedly obvious contradictions. But apart fromthat great video guys, keep reading the Bible!

It’s inauthentic. It’s lazy.

:(

I'm glad I didn't use more extreme language. My comments to this channel sometimes randomly appear on another channel and visa versa.

0:04 In what context did this discussion happen? If it was in response to a woman being assaulted, then that's messed up.

"Sharing" isn't a good choice of word here. Generally, when more than one person are *sharing* something finite, they each have less of it. And yet the perpetrator still has 100% responsibly for his actions.

The sound cuts out between 2:50 and 2:52. Maybe there is something they don't want us to hear. ('They', being RUclips)

4) The Organisational They: Mexican immigrants: "They are not going to be sending us their best. They're sending us their durg dealers, their unalivers, their S.A.rs." A politician said that. And the 'They' is not unnamed. It's Mexicans. But it still implies a level of organisation and directed management that does not exist. Who is deciding which Mexicans will emigrate? Who is preventing law-abiding, hard-working Mexicans from leaving Mexico?

Nice episode! I hadn’t thought of how using “they” makes its use unfalsifiable. Thanks for that.

Bla, bla, bla!

Great video 🎉❤. Hope you get one million subscribers sooner.

This whole channel looks ai

Are these two people created by AI? Why can't there be a real photo of them? Why is there such poor engagement here? Why are we talking about something like this is not relevant and useful? Leviticus can be ignored. And that annoying sing-songy exchange. Where is Bo Bennett here? I'm very confused. Unlistenable.

I have been a Dr. Bo Bennett fan, like, forever, and this is my first listen to this podcast. I found it unbelievably annoying to listen to this presentation style - childish and sing-songy. I had to stop listening to it. I won't be listening to any more of these. And I'm being kind.

hello ,it really nice video

So basically 'boys will be boys' therefore women need to alter their behaviour. Screw that.

Is this AI?

Governments rule by deception and the deceived run their system , Government narrative runs 24 seven , Governments are a society onto themselves

How about the diversity experiment you know united we stand diversity we fall

I camp at robber's cave often.. spend lots time there.. love the history.. the CCC did amazing job along with cedar lake and talimina drive

Superb promo. Makes me want to buy another copy.

Talking about a serious subject with a super mario music in background is a serious fail. It's so distracting I couldn't even focus on the information. Horrendous

Is it possible to write a book from a dissertation?

Still an incredible and relevant even one of the best even after an decade.

I would certainly want a complete editable version of my book to keep though. Can I download it as a Word doc? And all the artwork, I'd want that too.

That is absolutely amazing.

Im interested but i have questions about possible plagiarism and how does it prevent that? Also should I have an LLC?