Видео

Agreed, sound could always be improved. Thank you for your kind feedback!

Thank you for watching!💙

😄I bet there are good people there!

Thank you!💙

Yes Good point. But they did fear creative free thinkers, that is not people you want in a dictatorship, it’s a threat to it.

Yes it is a remarkable wild wild west. But all these new digital tools empowers the artists so I am convinced that things can and will transform even though it’s slow and the pushback is strong. A lesser dependence on the big institutions will have this effect, even though we can see just a glimpse of it.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the captions.💙Many that are not native English do find them useful and it actually generally increase views of the videos.🙂The auto cc is often very low quality. But all feedback is welcome and interesting.👍🏼🤗

​@LeapArtTV I also think it very much ruins watching the video. It works on short videos but longer videos like this are normally watched with the sound on so seeing words the whole time distracts from what I'm actually trying to watch. Also, you can make your own captions that will be shown instead so they aren't bad like the auto captions.

@@funkybit6857Valid point, thanks! This pop up style was a bit of an experiment, might go back to our normal subtitles since it obviously not working for some😊👍🏼

​​@@LeapArtTVplease use normal subtitle instead of flashing words. It's disconcerting.

Thanks for the feedback! Yes, let’s do that🙂🙌🏼

Yes that's very true, there's so much interesting sub topics in here to explore. More to come here!

Thank you for sharing your thoughts! I appreciate your insight on the complexities of the art market-it's definitely a topic that deserves more exploration. Not in Switserland but the country American's often mix up with it; Sweden :)

@@LeapArtTV😅 aha Sweden! I’m living in the Netherlands

Thank you, glad you found it interesting!💙

Yes indeed it is. They are iconic works👍🏼

❤️

Hahaha, you are right about that, I changed it now, thanks for the heads up! I will say to my defence though that I am not native English but Scandinavian, and I am running a one man show here: from scripting to editing and thumbnail design. So I am doing ok I would say and very proud of my little art channel🙂

@LeapArtTV it's an Excellent channel and you do a great job. I wasn't trying to be mean. I'm glad you were able to fix it. Loved your Rothko video.

Thank you for your feedback! In this video there is a mix of both, and it's basically sometimes a matter of getting the story or editing and researching for many days. As an artist I'm sure you know what I mean. :)

Yes I agree, the face of King Charles is the strongest part of this painting. And the butterfly :)

@@junemoonchild69 Love renaissance and baroque too!

Glad you found it interesting!☀️

You should have one!🙌🏼

@LeapArtTV bless your heart and may you live long, healthy and happy.

So happy you found it interesting, Thank you!💙

Thank you for this insightful and interesting comment! Btw I will publish a video with more on Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven👍

@@LeapArtTV I am looking forward to the video. She was a fascinating personality.

Thank you for your feedback, means a lot!💙

Thank you so much! I will dig deeper into the different groups and German expressionism too and make a video as soon as I researched enough👍🏼

Thank you for watching and for your kind feedback❤️It is a part of art history we should not forget indeed!

Thanks, so glad you liked it!💙

I did not know this take, very interesting, Thank you! I’ll look into it! So many male artists have tiden credit for art made by women, Camille Claudel/Rodin, Picasso/Jacqueline Roque etc etc.

Yes his ready mades we’re almost all constructed in some way by him. But for his contemporary audience this was as ready made art something could be at the time, compared to what could be seen in exhibitions. You are of course absolutely right, dada is a modernist movement, nothing else.

What we think of art in the "modern era" so to speak, is little more than therapy or posturing. Art has nothing to do with "personal expression" or style. The function of art is to commuicate a comprehendible message to convince the viewer and as a result manipulate their behaviour or beliefs usually for the benefit of the commissioner of the art. The message might be something along the lines of look I am rich, or I am virtuous or here is a religious story to keep you in line. Nothing wrong with art as therapy but what motivated say, Michelangelo or Carravaggio and say Monet or Van Gogh and those that followed are world's apart. It is important to acknowledge the distinction. The beauty and realism of the earlier part of art was a tool to convince the viewer of the message. No point in challenging the viewer to have to first decode the language before they can recieve the message. Everything post Duchamp can mostly be flushed down the toilet. Contemporary art lies in advertising because that is what the history of art before duchamp was all about. Adverts (and propaganda) are designed to convince people of messages contained within.

@@TheCompleteGuitarist Very valid point about about the purpose of communication of art, even though I don't agree that the impressionism with Van Gogh belongs in this category since that movement very much was about personal expression and interpretation of the subject matter. But just of curiosity if I may ask, the gradual change in the "purpose" of art to what it is today, do you think it makes it less valid or important?

@LeapArtTV I think monet and van gogh are some of the first exploring for personal reasons rather than to commission. The industrial revolution gave rise to more free time (leisure) and better readily available materials.

I agree!

You’re welcome!🙂