Видео

It will likey get massive enough for nuclear fusion and become a star

True, but I wouldn’t recommend trying that at home-plasma in the universe is a bit more impressive (and less kitchen-destructive)! 😉

The NASA budget is microscopic compared to the national budget. If you’re going to comment your opinions on it, you should also know that countless scientific discoveries have actually paved the way for profitable sciences that produce taxable revenue that faaaar exceeds any money we’ve ever put into purely scientific research. Things like MRI machines, the internet, computers and everything in between exists today because we “wasted money” on scientific research that didn’t have a profit incentive

You sir are somehow standing at the excact center, right now. 🤯🤯🤯🤯

the edge is also the center

It's a good question that will be answer soon. Have you check if the information about magnetic is real ? I'll go look it up.

THEY SAY NASA FOUND WATER ON THE MOON

Thanks for the feedback! I’ll definitely keep that in mind and add more variety in the next one. Glad you enjoyed it! Stay tuned in! Will definitely do more!

That would be a long trip for your body but it could be interesting. Maybe attached a go pro to you so we can see too 😂

same

The family. You've no idea about grieving and closure.

It’s another piece of space debris- which is NOT good for humanity.

@ oh yeah smart

Thanks for the heads-up! I’ve added the link to the description so you can check it out. Appreciate the nudge! 🙄😉

Thanks so much for the support! I really appreciate it, and I’ll definitely keep the content coming. You’re awesome!

Its a DEATH STAR!!!! lol

Why you do have to be so rude. There is nothing wrong with the video!

Agreed… no need to be rude!

The only time you wasted was writing that comment!

Good catch! You're absolutely right-photons push us away from the Sun. I used 'stars' in the broader sense, as in heading toward the stars we see in the sky. Thanks for pointing that out!

Our estimate of the universe's age, 13.8 billion years, is based on what we can observe, such as the cosmic microwave background and the expansion rate of the universe. As science advances and we gather new data, these estimates could evolve. Universal time remains a fascinatingly complex concept

@Beyond_The_Horizon_BTH It's not complex, just not understood by blinkered scientists

@Beyond_The_Horizon_BTH It's not complex. Do you suppose that an arbitrary timescale based on a tiny planet orbiting a totally insignificant sun in a minor galaxy gives a true solution? Lifeforms everywhere in the universe will have their own ideas of its age, but it would be possible to assimilate all predictions because the underlying scale of time is universal and is what governs each assessment anywhere and everywhere in the universe. However, when we are considering an event such as a big bang, where we suggest there to be almost infinite mass in a very small space then we have to take account of the effects of that mass on the rate at which time has been slowed. Since the mass is near infinite then the flow of time is near stopped. This does not mean motion has near stopped as that motion is the cause of the slowing. Hence the initial stages of our universe would in fact have taken billions more years to create to what we think must be the theoretical/observable start. If one considers the situation where virtually no mass is present, eg prior to a big bang or in the centre of a massive void between galaxy clusters then as we know from relativity time will flow extremely quickly such that particle pairs are being produced in such quantities that entanglement is the norm and what we call dark energy exists. Thus Cosmic Time ie that controlling our universe and all other universes is absolute and varies between absolute limits of completly stopped and passing infinitely quickly. Then of course we have to observe the laws of Quantum mechanics which don't allow us to reach absolute limits, but recognises there will be some small variations that might at some moment take us so close to the limit that something mega happens.

You're correct that the age of stars is an estimate, often with a margin of error. However, the video aims to spark curiosity about the fascinating methods scientists use to study the universe. Thanks for sharing your insight!

Thank you for giving it a shot and watching all the way through!

Interesting interpretation! Rest assured, it was just an emphasis for effect. No hidden meanings here-just trying to keep things engaging!